All posts by Jonathan Chevreau

Budget’s lower RRIF withdrawal rates didn’t go far enough

By Tim Paziuk

Special to the Financial Independence Hub 

tim-paziuk-250
Tim Paziuk

In the recent Federal Budget, the government listened to seniors and advisors and reduced the minimum withdrawal amounts for RRIFs (Registered Retirement Income Funds). But did they go far enough?

If you’re not familiar with minimum withdrawal amounts, here’s a quick overview:

Up until the time you’re age 71 (or if your spouse is younger, their age 71) and you’re earning an income, you can contribute money on a tax deductible basis to a personal or spousal RRSP (Registered Retirement Savings Plan).

When you reach age 71 you have a decision to make. The decision is, do you convert your RRSP to a RRIF, an annuity, or do you cash it out (or a combination of the three). If you choose to convert it to a RRIF, the income payments cannot be deferred any longer than the following year (age 72). Continue Reading…

Post-budget primer on RRIF withdrawal strategies 2015 and beyond

Adrian
Adrian Mastracci, KCM Wealth

By Adrian Mastracci, KCM Wealth Management

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

“Be very mindful of your RRIF. Understand its purpose. Then review it periodically to make sure it’s on track to deliver.”

It’s time to start paying special attention to RRIFs.
Even if you don’t yet need one.

RRIFs (Registered Retirement Income Funds) are income withdrawal plans, while RRSPs are savings plans.

No deposits are allowed to be made into a RRIF after the RRSP conversion.

The venerable RRIF remains firmly entrenched as a prominent retirement planning vehicle.
It has become an essential foundation of many a retirement nest egg.

Starting a RRIF at age 71 implies long-term planning, say to age 90 and beyond, especially if there is a younger spouse.

That’s one very good reason to be aware of the details.

Two major changes were proposed in the recent Federal Budget, starting in 2015:

  • Minimum RRIF draws are reduced for ages 71 to 94 (See highlighted figures in table below).
  • Re-deposit of the difference in draws is allowed by Feb 2016.

Continue Reading…

Weekly Wrap: Happiness without ambition, learning from divorce, how to hire a caregiver

Ambition road sign

Can you be happy without ambition? That’s probably not a question many of us ask ourselves, but it was posed by Joe Udo the other day at his Retire by 40 site: Can you be happy without ambition?

I don’t know about Joe’s professed lack of ambition but in my view, achieving early Findependence by 40 and running a web site about how you did it qualifies as ambitious. And as I’ve often argued, such activities really do not constitute retirement in the sense of doing absolutely nothing all day long. Joe and the many other Early “Retirement” gurus are still working, and from what I’ve experienced the past year, are probably working pretty hard. Same with writing books and giving paid speeches. It’s still work  but there is some freedom being outside the corporate gilded cage.

Continue Reading…

How to achieve “Flow” — or optimal experience

flowBy Jonathan Chevreau,

Financial Independence Hub

In a book on happiness we reviewed here recently, I came across a book called Flow, billed in the subtitle as “The psychology of optimal experience.”

This book, first published as a hardcover way back in 1990, became a New York Times bestseller and has spawned several followup titles elaborating on the concept of flow and creativity. The author’s name is not easily recalled: Mihaly Czikszentmihalyi, a psychology professor at California’s Drucker School of Management and also director of the Quality of Life Research Center at Drucker. (Incidentally, if you find the name unpronounceable and unmemorable, as I do, one of his books helpfully suggests the surname can be pronounced “chick-SENT-me-high.”)

Here’s what Wikipedia says about Flow and the author who coined the term.

I must say that I was a bit skeptical about the term at first: Continue Reading…

US Large Caps top Templeton asset-class chart but remember Winners Rotate

Here’s my latest MoneySense column, entitled Why Diversify? This chart shows you why. I used to write about this chart back at the Financial Post, and tacked the chart up on my cubicle wall. An updated version of the chart later followed me to my office at MoneySense, and the one below is now in my Editor-at-Large’s home office. Click on the above link to get to the chart, which can be further enlarged on your monitor.

The Hub’s version of the blog below also shows a second chart at the bottom about Risk. As you’ll see, it’s more predictable, living up to Franklin Templeton’s assertion that risk is more predictable than returns. I’ve always found it a useful reminder of the futility of chasing last year’s winners or attempting to predict next year’s winning asset classes. If you can’t get the charts  free through your financial advisor, you can download them here.

By Jonathan Chevreau

Franklin Templeton Why Diversify_low resolution

Continue Reading…