Hub Blogs

Hub Blogs contains fresh contributions written by Financial Independence Hub staff or contributors that have not appeared elsewhere first, or have been modified or customized for the Hub by the original blogger. In contrast, Top Blogs shows links to the best external financial blogs around the world.

5 reasons why your business should hire accountants

By Neil Coleman

(Sponsored Content)

Exceptional financial management is necessary for any company, whether large or small. As a business owner, you have your hands full with the operations and marketing strategies that should be implemented for the growth of your company. Fortunately, you can delegate finance and bookkeeping tasks to an accountant.

You have two options of hiring accountants for your enterprise. One way is to outsource it to a team of trustworthy certified public accountants (CPAs) like the experts from http://www.daviekaplan.com/. Another method is to hire in-house employees who can contribute their skills and previous experiences to monitoring this particular department.

Regardless of how you go about in recruiting accounting staff, here are the reasons why you should invest in them:

 1.) They help you maximize profit early on

Accountants are beneficial during the early stages of your company as they can advise you on what business model will be most useful for your venture and help you set attainable goals. They can also help calculate the pricing structure of your products and services to maximize profits. Moreover, accountants know the ins and outs of the banking system so they can set up your account successfully and determine if you need to open a merchant account.

2.) They organize your financial reports

Your  income statement or profit-and-loss account is a crucial financial document that showcases your business’ revenues and expenses during a specified time. By having an accountant onboard from day one, you can have the reports organized so that you can track your progress without difficulty.

Aside from the statement containing your profits and losses, these are two other essential financial reports that every business must have:

  • Balance Sheet: This gives you a glimpse of your company’s assets, liabilities, and shareholders’ equity. Assets are the valuable things owned by your business that are already in cash or can be converted to currency. Liabilities, also known as debts, are the amounts of money you owe others, whereas shareholders’ equity is the amount that you would end up with if you sold all your assets and paid off all the debts.
  • Cash-Flow Statement: This document details the company’s inflows and outflows of cash. It informs you if your company generates income or loses money during a period. Operating, investing, and financing activities can be found in this file.

These financial reports are vital for the compilation of annual reports. This document summarizes the performance of your business during the year and projections for the next twelve months. It includes audited financial statements that inform you and your investors about how well your company is doing.

3.) They save you from penalties

Your accountants can focus on the deadlines of government-mandated processes, such as taxes and social security contributions. The IRS can be exceptionally nitpicky about filing deadlines and audits. Penalties for delayed payments and filing can be such a burden. Save yourself from the stress of remembering all those deadlines by hiring a dedicated team of accounting staff.

4.) They lend a hand in making smart financial decisions

As a business owner, you have multiple roles to take on each day. Your employees would ask for solutions on company-related matters, such as who to hire among the candidates and what marketing strategies to implement this week. Continue Reading…

Are all Pension incomes created equal?

Image Shutterstock

By Ian Moyer

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Pension incomes are not created equal. They come in all shapes and sizes. They are as varied as the people who have accumulated them and who seek to use them. 

In this seemingly infinite variety, in this mathematical complexity, there is a common thread as far as advisors are concerned: delivering clients the most after-tax income possible. 

CPP, OAS, Defined Benefit Pension, Dividend Income, Interest Income, RRIFs, Part Time Employment Income, Corporate Dividends, TFSAs: These are just a few of the various sources of income individuals may have access to when they exit the workforce.  Upon retirement, decisions about what, when, and how much income to draw upon, move to the forefront.

Tax is key to coordinating multiple income streams

Coordination here is key as each of these sources of income is subject to different tax rates, different tax deferrals and different estate taxes. Tax is key, in other words.

Recent or prospective retirees need more than a competent advisor at this stage. Understanding the tax rates, tax deferral rates and the implications regarding OAS and Income Splitting is one thing. But accounting for these sources of income and the complicated ways in which they interact requires an algorithm.

The specialized software, Cascades, cascadesfs.com, performs these calculations, giving users informed withdrawal strategies. Designed by financial advisors in partnership with software developers, Cascades uses actual tax rates, not average tax rates, projecting for the duration of retirement, including longevity risk.

Because numbers require context to be meaningful, let us consider prospective retirees Bill and Anne Smith.

Case Study: a Couple in their late 60s

Retirement Plan: Bill and Ann are 68 and 67 currently. They have been retired for a few years but still have RRSPs and a LIRA and want to know if they should start using them for income or defer payments until age 71. 

Income Sources: Both have CPP and OAS. Anne has a defined benefit pension from having worked as a teacher. 

Investments: Bill has a healthy RRSP and Anne has a modest RRSP and a LIRA. They have maxed out their TFSAs and each have about $100,000 additionally in individual non-registered accounts. 

Total: 12 different income sources and investment accounts to manage for retirement income

Cascades provides direction in the following way. Users — whether they be Anne and Bill themselves, or their advisors — fill in a detailed online questionnaire, submit their responses and in under ten seconds they have a report. This report (an excerpt is shown at the top of this blog) automatically gives three potential strategies and shows which one works best. For Anne and Bill, drawing down and re-investing their registered accounts first is expected to save them over $75,000 in their estate compared to a complete deferral of their registered money. 

As far as Bob and Linda Sanderson are concerned, on the other hand, a Cascades report advises them to do just the opposite and ultimately predicts a savings of $125,000. Here’s how:

Quite different withdrawal recommendations for this younger couple

Bob and Linda are both 55 and currently working. They plan to retire in 10 years. They have a rental property they maintain that they plan to sell in 15 years and want to know how to plan for the long-term. 

 

Income Sources: Both will receive CPP and OAS. Bob will receive a small defined benefit pension. Both will earn rental income until sale of the property. Both will receive corporate dividends until age 80 from a holding company. 

Investments: Both have large RRSPs, nearly capped TFSAs, and a small amount of non-registered savings. Additionally, Linda has a small LIRA. 

Total: 18 different income sources and investment accounts to manage for retirement income.

Cascades proposes three withdrawal strategies and highlights the best plan. Using all of their non-registered savings before rolling over registered investments will save Bob and Linda over $125,000 in their estate compared to an early drawdown of their registered money. Cascades software is designed to help users do their due diligence on the matter of retirement planning. The results are specifically tailored to the retirement in question and they are reliable, informed and rigorously defined as they are by Canada’s vast and varied tax laws.

.

Ian Moyer is the founder of Ian C. Moyer Insurance Agency Inc. and Cascades Financial Solutions Inc.

Vanguard announces the passing of founder John C. Bogle

The investment industry is saddened to learn of the passing of Vanguard founder John C. Bogle today. A true giant of the industry, Bogle was virtually the creator of index mutual funds and ETFs, and passive investing in general. Below is the press release issued today by Vanguard, which we reprint in full. I have added a few subheads and made only very minor edits.  

VALLEY FORGE, PA (January 16, 2019) — Vanguard announces the passing of John Clifton Bogle, founder of The Vanguard Group, who died today in Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania. He was 89.

Mr. Bogle had legendary status in the American investment community, largely because of two towering achievements: He introduced the first index mutual fund for investors and, in the face of skeptics, stood behind the concept until it gained widespread acceptance; and he drove down costs across the mutual fund industry by ceaselessly campaigning in the interests of investors. Vanguard, the company he founded to embody his philosophy, is now one of the largest investment management firms in the world.

“Jack Bogle made an impact on not only the entire investment industry, but more importantly, on the lives of countless individuals saving for their futures or their children’s futures,” said Vanguard CEO Tim Buckley. “He was a tremendously intelligent, driven, and talented visionary whose ideas completely changed the way we invest. We are honored to continue his legacy of giving every investor ‘a fair shake.’”

Mr. Bogle, a resident of Bryn Mawr, PA, began his career in 1951 after graduating magna cum laude in economics from Princeton University. His senior thesis on mutual funds had caught the eye of fellow Princeton alumnus Walter L. Morgan, who had founded Wellington Fund, the nation’s oldest balanced fund, in 1929 and was one of the deans of the mutual fund industry. Mr. Morgan hired the ambitious 22-year-old for his Philadelphia-based investment management firm, Wellington Management Company.

Mr. Bogle worked in several departments before becoming assistant to the president in 1955, the first in a series of executive positions he would hold at Wellington: 1962, administrative vice president; 1965, executive vice president; and 1967, president. Mr. Bogle became the driving force behind Wellington’s growth into a mutual fund family after he persuaded Mr. Morgan, in the late 1950s, to start an equity fund that would complement Wellington Fund. Windsor Fund, a value-oriented equity fund, debuted in 1958.

In 1967, Mr. Bogle led the merger of Wellington Management Company with the Boston investment firm Thorndike, Doran, Paine & Lewis (TDPL). Seven years later, a management dispute with the principals of TDPL led Mr. Bogle to form Vanguard in September 1974 to handle the administrative functions of Wellington’s funds, while TDPL/Wellington Management would retain the investment management and distribution duties. The Vanguard Group of Investment Companies commenced operations on May 1, 1975.

The “Vanguard experiment”

To describe his new venture, Mr. Bogle coined the term “The Vanguard Experiment.” It was an experiment in which mutual funds would operate at cost and independently, with their own directors, officers, and staff—a radical change from the traditional mutual fund corporate structure, whereby an external management company ran a fund’s affairs on a for-profit basis.

“Our challenge at the time,” Mr. Bogle recalled a decade later, “was to build, out of the ashes of major corporate conflict, a new and better way of running a mutual fund complex. The Vanguard Experiment was designed to prove that mutual funds could operate independently, and do so in a manner that would directly benefit their shareholders.”

First index mutual fund in 1976

In 1976, Vanguard introduced the first index mutual fund — First Index Investment Trust — for individual investors. Ridiculed by others in the industry as “un-American” and “a sure path to mediocrity,” the fund collected a mere $11 million during its initial underwriting. Now known as Vanguard 500 Index Fund, it has grown to be one of the industry’s largest, with more than $441 billion in assets (the sister fund, Vanguard Institutional Index Fund, has $221.5 billion in assets). Today, index funds account for more than 70% of Vanguard’s $4.9 trillion in assets under management; they are offered by many other fund companies as well and they make up most exchange-traded funds (ETFs). For his pioneering of the index concept for individual investors, Mr. Bogle was often called the “father of indexing.”

1977: Direct to investors

Mr. Bogle and Vanguard again broke from industry tradition in 1977, when Vanguard ceased to market its funds through brokers and instead offered them directly to investors. The company eliminated sales charges and became a pure no-load mutual fund complex—a move that would save shareholders hundreds of millions of dollars in sales commissions. This was a theme for Mr. Bogle and his successors: Vanguard is known today for maintaining investment costs among the lowest in the industry.

A champion of the individual investor, Mr. Bogle is widely credited with helping to bring increased disclosure about mutual fund costs and performance to the public. His commitment to safeguarding investors’ interests often prompted him to speak out against practices that were common among his peers in other mutual fund organizations. “We are more than a mere industry,” he insisted in a 1987 speech before the National Investment Company Services Association. “We must hold ourselves to higher standards, standards of trust and fiduciary duty. Change we must—in our communications, our pricing structure, our product, and our promotional techniques.”

Mr. Bogle spoke frequently before industry professionals and the public. He liked to write his own speeches. He also responded personally to many of the letters written to him by Vanguard shareholders, and he wrote many reports, sometimes as long as 25 pages, to Vanguard employees — whom he called “crew members” in light of Vanguard’s nautical theme. (Mr. Bogle named the company after Admiral Horatio Nelson’s flagship at the Battle of the Nile in 1798; he thought the name “Vanguard” resonated with the themes of leadership and progress.)

In January 1996, Mr. Bogle passed the reins of Vanguard to his hand-picked successor, John J. Brennan, who joined the company in 1982 as Mr. Bogle’s assistant. The following month, Mr. Bogle underwent heart transplant surgery. A few months later, he was back in the office, writing and speaking about issues of importance to mutual fund investors. Continue Reading…

Is 2019 gold’s year to shine? A Q&A with Harvest president & CEO Michael Kovacs

Harvest Portfolios Group Inc. launched a global gold ETF yesterday (on January 15, 2019.) In the sponsored Q&A below, Harvest President & CEO Michael Kovacs explains why the company is launching the Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF (TSX: HGGG) now, the thinking behind this unique ETF and why the ETF aligns with the Harvest value strategy of conservative growth and income.

Why is Harvest launching a gold ETF?

We are not gold bugs, but we have been looking at the gold market for some time, especially gold company shares. They have been in a bear market for the better part of six years, so share prices are low. We see considerable value there.

A lot of the smaller companies are out of business because they couldn’t make money at these lower prices. Others that are struggling are being acquired by the big companies. Consolidation is a sign of a market bottom and while there is always downside risk in investing, we think a lot of that risk is out of the market.

So your focus is just the largest global producers?

Yes. If you’re a large firm you’re able to take advantage of the situation.  So we looked at the top global gold companies – the biggest by market cap – and are focusing on just the top 20. So if gold rises there is a lot of upside potential.

The other thing is that we’re in the late stages of the economic cycle. I don’t know whether we are in the ninth inning, or we have some extra innings ahead, but at some point US markets will start to weaken. Interest rates will top out and probably decline. We will see some decline in the US dollar as well. The US dollar has been on a tear and like any cycle it will probably come to an end.

At that point investments like gold make a lot of sense. There’s inherent leverage in the equities if gold prices rise.

Why is that?

In a simplified example, let’s say you are Barrick Gold Corporation producing gold at $800 an ounce. Gold is worth about $1,250 an ounce, so your margin is $450. If gold rises by $250 to $1,500, you’re increasing your profit margin by 55%. That goes directly to the bottom line.  So we think it is an opportune time to be looking at large gold producers.

Are you worried about inflation?

We do not see a lot of inflation. There may be some inflationary pressures, but the world has changed so much with technology. Continue Reading…

Retired Money: Is $1 million the magic number for Findependence?

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column was just published, focused on Monday morning’s release of the 2019 RBC Financial Independence in Retirement poll.

Click on the highlighted headline to retrieve the full article: The Magic numbers for your Findependence nest egg revealed.

And yes, they did use my term Findependence in the headline, which is a neologism I coined and is of course merely a contraction for Financial Independence.

May as well save a few keystrokes and/or syllables!

As I note in the column, I like the fact that RBC uses the term Financial Independence instead of the more commonly used “Retirement.” The two are not the same thing: it’s possible to be financially independent but not retired (that’s the case for myself and possibly many who frequent this website). But as I also note, it’s pretty hard to be retired if you’re NOT also financially independent. If the distinction eludes you, read my book Findependence Day.

In its poll, RBC can’t resist throwing out the figure $1 million as the level many non-retired Canadians believe is necessary to amass: not for “Retirement” per se, mind, but for what they call “a comfortable financial future.”

Call it what you will but RBC identifies four “top motivators” to accumulating such a nest egg: being debt-free, having things to make life more comfortable, having money to take part in desired experiences, and having enough to travel wherever you want.

BC needs $1 million for Findependence, Quebec just $427,000

So how much does it take to get there? Apparently, those in British Columbia need a little more than the rest of us: $1.07 million, compared to a national average of $787,000. Continue Reading…