Hub Blogs contains fresh contributions written by Financial Independence Hub staff or contributors that have not appeared elsewhere first, or have been modified or customized for the Hub by the original blogger. In contrast, Top Blogs shows links to the best external financial blogs around the world.
Kevin Purkiss, vice president, Fraud Management, RBC
Special to Financial Independence Hub
While we don’t always want to think about the risk of fraud, it’s never been more important to stay vigilant. During the pandemic we saw a sharp rise in fraud attempts, but it may be about to get worse if we end up in a recession later this year.
Not only have we seen a strong correlation between increased fraud and economic slowdowns in the past, but many Canadians believe a recession will make fraud even more risky, according to new RBC research.
The poll found that 78% of Canadians believe a recession will increase everyone’s fraud risk and 42% think it will be harder to spot scams during a recession than in the pandemic. Three quarters (75%) also believe that it’s easier to fall victim to a scam when you’re struggling financially and 36% are simply too worried about other issues to be concerned about fraud.
While it’s understandable that Canadians have a lot on their minds and don’t want to think about fraud, scams are getting harder to spot and fraudsters are becoming more sophisticated. This is why we all need to continue to stay aware and take steps to protect ourselves.
Missing the signs of fraud is costing us money
Our research also found that 32% of respondents are concerned they are already starting to miss the signs of potential fraud and 71% are worried it will be harder to spot the signs of fraud as they get older.
Almost a quarter (23%) have been a victim of fraud or fallen for a scam, with 14% saying they lost money because of a scam. While the average lost was $400, 6% of respondents say they lost more than $10,000.
Apathy about fraud risk among Canadians 18-34
More than half (53%) of adult Canadians under the age of 35 say they share more information online than they should and 44% say they are quick to share personal data to get access to an offer, website, app or service. Thirty-five per cent of this age group also perceive fraud as something that happens to others, but not to them, and 33% have never been worried about falling victim to a scam. Continue Reading…
By Winnie Jiang, Vice President, Portfolio Manager, BMO ETFs
(Sponsor Content)
Little about the current economic cycle has conformed to historical norms. With divergence in employment data and leading economic indicators, recent data released sent mixed signals that left investors perplexed about the near-term economic outlook.
On one hand, the job market remains overwhelmingly strong, with ISM (Institute for Supply Management) Services bouncing back from extreme lows in December and retail sales also rebounding. The re-opening of the Chinese economy will likely provide a breather on global supply chain issues while boosting demand. Consumer credit remains well retained as default rates stay low with no warning signs of near-term upticks.
On the other hand, yield curve inversions, a precedent of most recessions, continue to worsen. 3-month U.S. Treasury yields are pushed above 10-year yields by the widest margin since the early 1980s. ISM Manufacturing PMI (purchasing managers’ index) and housing data also point to a gloomy outlook. Corporate sentiment and capital expenditure showed little signs of recovery, and housing permits have rolled back to pre-pandemic levels after surging strongly during Covid.
Source: Bloomberg, January 31st, 2023
The Outlook
While robust job markets and consumer data keep inflation well above the Fed’s long-term target, recent CPI (Consumer Price Index) announcements indicate things are steadily, albeit slowly, moving towards the right direction. The inversion of the yield curve caps the magnitude of further rate increases that could be absorbed by the economy before it slips into a recession.
The 2023 federal budget dropped on or about 4 pm Tuesday (March 28.) You can click here and here for budget documents and the latest from the Department of Finance. Below are links to some of the early media coverage, much of which is in Wednesday’s papers.
The theme of the budget is Making Life More Affordable, a somewhat comic choice given that government’s inflationary policies and high-spending, high-taxing behaviour is a big part of what makes life so expensive, especially for one-income couples. [See Steve Nease cartoon below on his take on the impact on the middle class.]
Here’s the Department of Finance’s backgrounder on it.
Pre-budget one of the biggest concerns expressed by investors was whether the capital gains tax or the inclusion rate might be hiked. That did not appear to transpire in the budget, at least for the middle class. See however Christopher Nardi’s article in the National Post highlighted below: he suggests those affected by the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) may indeed pay more in capital gains tax.
Also hoped for was measures to delay or reduce annual forced taxable withdrawals from Registered Retirement Income Funds (RRIFs). I saw no mention of this in early coverage listed below.
CBC’s summary
On TV, the CBC highlighted that the deficit will grow by $69 billion between 2022 and 2028, no longer projecting a balanced budget in this fiscal framework. On the CBC website it provided the following highlights:
$43B in net new spending over six years.
3 main priorities: health care/dental, affordability and clean economy.
Doubling of GST rebate extended for lower income Canadians, up to $467 for a family.
$13B over five years to implement dental care plan for families earning less than $90K.
$20B over six years for tax credits to promote investment in green technologies.
$4B over five years for an Indigenous housing strategy.
$359 million over five years for programs addressing the opioid crisis.
$158 million over three years for a suicide prevention hotline, launching Nov. 30.
Creation of new agency to combat foreign interference.
Deficit for 2022-23 expected to be $43B, higher than projected in the fall.
Higher than expected deficits projected for next 5 years.
Federal debt hits $1.18 trillion. Debt-to-GDP ratio will rise slightly over next 2 years.
$2.5 billion for a GST tax credit billed as a ‘grocery rebate’
$46.2 billion for federal-provincial-territorial health deals
$13 billion for expanding the federal dental plan
2 per cent cap on incoming excise duty increase on alcohol
Advancing passenger protections but upping a traveller charge
$4.5 billion for 30 per cent tax credit on clean tech manufacturing
$15.4 billion in savings from public service spending cutbacks
Much of the budget was previously announced or telegraphed
The National Post weighed in with this: Chrystia Freeland abandons budget balance plan, adding $50 billion in debt. It noted “much of what is in the budget has been previously announced — or at the very least telegraphed. Ottawa will spend an extra $22 billion on health care over the next five years, as per provincial deals announced last month. It’s also adding about $7 billion for expanded dental care. Low-income Canadians will receive an extra GST credit, at a cost of $2.5 billion.
“From blue-collar bluster to giant green subsidies, Made-in-Canada packaging and make-the-rich-pay rhetoric, Canada’s federal budget borrows from the U.S.”
Green tax credits, more dental care as expected pre-budget
Also expected, according to this FP story published before the budget was released, was “significant” tax credits for the green economy, more measures on dental care and other ways to make life more “affordable,” including amendments to the Criminal Code to reduce predatory lending. It was expected the criminal interest rate be lowered to 35%, as it is in Quebec. The predatory lending measure is indeed included, as you can see in the link to the backgrounder above.
Also leaked earlier in the day was a report in the Globe & Mail that there will be a clean-tech manufacturing tax credit to encourage domestic mining of critical minerals.
Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) rises
Here is an early overview from the Globe & Mail after 4 pm: Federal budget 2023: Trudeau government bets on green economy, expands dental care. The G&M reported Ottawa plans to raise “nearly $3-billion through changes to the Alternative Minimum Tax, which is a second way of calculating tax obligations to ensure a high wealth individual can’t make excessive use of tax deductions … 99 per cent of the AMT would be paid by those who earn more than $300,000 a year and about 80 per cent would be paid by those who earn more than $1-million.”
‘With this first overhaul since 1986, the AMT will now apply largely to Canadians in the top income tax bracket (over $173,000) and will see their capital gains inclusion rate jump to 100 per cent and a host of eligible tax deductions, like moving or employment expenses, dropped to 50 per cent.”
My latest MoneySense Retired Money column takes a look at how a new Government program can be used by young people to save up tax-effectively for a first home: including the children of retirees and the almost-retired. For the full column, click on the highlighted text: How retired parents can use the FHSA to help their adult children.
The new First Home Savings Accounts [FHSA] should be operational by April 1, 2023. At least two regular bloggers who often appear here on the Hub have weighed in with summaries of the program. Dale Roberts’ take appeared on his cuthecrapinvesting blog on March 1st. Mark Seed’s myownadvisor blog ran a summary of the key points on March 4th.
For MoneySense and Retired Money, I took a bit of a different take, seeing as the column’s focus technically is on Retirees and near-retirees. These days, that category consists primarily of aging baby boomers like myself, but of course many of us have adult children who may have been slow to jump into the real estate market with home prices in places like Vancouver and the GTA soaring in recent years during the long spell of almost-free money. That era has of course ended with the Bank of Canada gradually raising rates over the past year, which has also helped to push home prices down to slightly more reasonable levels.
Whether they become even more reasonable remains to be seen but of course the positive of slightly lower prices is offset by higher mortgage rates so it’s a bit of a Hobson’s choice. You can wait and hope for the proverbial “blood in the streets” to hit home prices and make the plunge into ownership then, but there’s no guarantee that will happen.
Either way, if Ottawa is providing another tax-optimized way to save up a down payment, why not take advantage of it? We already have the RRSP home-buying program [HBP] and there’s no reason why TFSAs can’t also be used for the same purpose. What’s nice about the new FHSA is that not only does it tax-shelter investment income but it also provides a tax refund on contributions, similar to how RRSPs do so. (as the above blogs note, there are differences however.)
The Home Savings plan we all dreamt of
As quoted in the MoneySense column, CFP and RFP Matthew Ardrey, Wealth Advisor & Portfolio Manager with Toronto-based TriDelta Financial provides the following enthusiastic thumbs up for the new program: “The FHSA is the home savings plan we were all dreaming of when we first got the HBP. Combining the best aspects of the RRSP, tax deductions for contributions, and the TFSA, tax-free qualifying withdrawals, this can be a game changer for the next generation of homebuyers in Canada.” Continue Reading…
Most people know that investing in the stock market is a good way to earn higher returns on their investments. Money in savings accounts and GICs doesn’t grow fast enough to keep up with inflation over time. To avoid eroding the value of savings, the stock market is the place to be.
You might agree that you need higher returns, but you might not want to support certain companies or industries for ethical reasons. When you buy a traditional mutual fund or exchange-traded fund (ETF), you will own dozens, hundreds or even thousands of companies. Not all of them will line up with your values.
The stock market is an efficient mechanism for companies to get access to the funding they need to grow – to develop new products, to offer more services, and to produce more goods. Like it or not, we are all part of this ecosystem. It’s impossible to escape. But what if you could earn higher returns while avoiding the worst of the worst companies, the ones you really don’t like?
Enter SRI and ESG investing.
What is SRI, ESG and impact investing?
SRI and ESG investing are terms used to describe ethical investing. Sometimes the terms are used interchangeably, but there are differences.
Socially-responsible investing, or SRI, is a way for investors to own companies that better align with their values, usually by eliminating certain sectors of the economy like oil, tobacco and weapons. Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investing is a little different – it applies a screen to companies to evaluate their practices as it relates to environmental, social and governance issues. The main difference is that with SRI you are avoiding certain industries, but with ESG you are investing in the “better or less bad” companies. There is a third term: impact investing. This takes things a step further and focusses on companies that are actively doing ethically-appealing activities, like funding community projects, enhancing solar energy technology, or financing local food producers.
For example, an SRI ETF might invest in the U.S. market index but eliminate companies in oil production and weapons manufacturing. An ESG fund might invest in the U.S. market index but exclude the bottom 25% of companies, as ranked by their ESG practices. An impact fund might invest only in solar energy companies.
Three things you need to know
There are some important things to understand about ethical investing before you jump in.
You’re not always getting what you think you’re getting.
Would you be surprised to learn that your ESG fund owns Amazon, a seller of massive amounts of consumer goods that provides same-day, gas-guzzling delivery? Or Halliburton, one of the world’s largest fracking companies? Or Agnico-Eagle, a mining company? The reason they are in the ESG fund is that they are actively doing things to be less bad, or even do some good. They get points for writing a report outlining their environmental practices, like buying electric vehicles, using more green energy in their operations, and doing environment clean-up. Their operations might not be great for the world (although we all use oil and gas, metal, and probably Amazon), but they are offsetting some of the damage by doing good things. Continue Reading…