Decumulate & Downsize

Most of your investing life you and your adviser (if you have one) are focused on wealth accumulation. But, we tend to forget, eventually the whole idea of this long process of delayed gratification is to actually spend this money! That’s decumulation as opposed to wealth accumulation. This stage may also involve downsizing from larger homes to smaller ones or condos, moving to the country or otherwise simplifying your life and jettisoning possessions that may tie you down.

Beyond Annuities: Innovative Longevity Products for Retirees

Deposit Photos

Below we canvas 11 retirement experts and financial planners in Canada and the United States about how they and their clients can use new Longevity insurance products above and beyond traditional life annuities.

These experts were gathered by Featured.com, which has been supplying Findependence Hub with quality content for several years. It recently changed its procedure so editors like myself can request input on particular topics we think will interest our readership. The sources are all on LinkedIn, as you can see by clicking on their profiles below.

Here’s what we asked for this instalment:

 “In addition to Annuities, what is one new Longevity product or fund that you believe in enough to recommend to clients approaching or already in Retirement? Examples in Canada are Purpose Longevity Fund and Guardian’s Longevity Funds. Are there similar new products in the U.S. (or Canada) of which  you are aware?”

Here is what these 11 thought leaders had to say:

LifeX ETF delivers transparent Longevity Income

In addition to traditional annuities, one of the emerging longevity products in the U.S. that I have come to recommend to clients approaching or already in retirement is the LifeX Longevity Income ETF, particularly the LFAI fund.

While it is not a classic insurance product, it is designed to provide predictable monthly distributions over a long horizon, effectively hedging against the risk of outliving one’s assets. The fund invests primarily in U.S. Treasuries and money-market instruments, and its structure is built around the concept of a target cohort’s 100th birthday, which allows for a systematic income stream without relying on a life insurance company guarantee.

For many clients, especially those who purchased assets during low-interest periods or are seeking reliable cash flow without tying up their entire portfolio in an annuity, this product offers a compelling complement to their existing retirement income strategy. What I find particularly valuable is the transparency it provides. Unlike certain annuities, clients can clearly see the underlying investments, understand how distributions are generated, and retain the flexibility to adjust allocations as their personal circumstances or market conditions evolve.

It also fits naturally into a broader retirement strategy where a portion of assets remains growth-oriented, some is allocated to defensive income-generating investments, and a dedicated longevity-income segment addresses the specific risk of living decades beyond retirement.

Of course, it is not without considerations; while the fund aims to provide stable income, it is sensitive to interest-rate changes, inflation, and the assumptions built into its cohort-based design. Clients need to assess the fit carefully, ensuring the time horizon and income targets align with their health, lifestyle, and other holdings. For those who understand these dynamics, however, it offers a sophisticated and innovative approach to longevity planning, bridging the gap between traditional annuities and fully self-managed income portfolios, and giving retirees confidence that they can sustain their lifestyle even as they live longer than expected.

Andrew Izrailo, Senior Corporate and Fiduciary Manager, Astra Trust

BlackRock LifePath Paycheck Fund Offers Flexibility

JP Moses, Tennessee

If you’re getting close to retirement, you might want to check out the BlackRock LifePath Paycheck fund. I’ve been following it. It works like those Canadian longevity funds, designed to give you regular monthly checks. The biggest risk is outliving your savings, and this fund has professionals handle the withdrawals so you don’t run out of money. It seems to offer more flexibility than a traditional annuity, which is worth a look.

JP Moses, President & Director of Content Awesomely, Awesomely

——————————————-

Vanguard and Fidelity Deliver Stable Retirement Income

Evan Tunis, Florida

The Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund is not an entirely new “longevity” product in the mold of Canada’s Purpose and Guardian funds, but it fulfills a similar role for retirees. It is intended to deliver a steady flow of income while protecting against the effects of inflation by investing in a diversified blend of stocks, bonds and cash. The Fidelity Strategic Advisers (r) Core Income Fund is also designed to provide income for retirees with a diversified approach. The two funds both provide some level of stability for those who want to keep a lid on risk and market vomit in retirement.

Evan Tunis, President, Florida Healthcare Insurance

——————————————-

Modern LifeX ETFs balance Freedom and Income

Niclas Schlopsna, Germany

I’ve often been asked about newer longevity products beyond traditional annuities, especially by clients preparing for retirement who want flexibility without giving up stability. What I have observed while working with financially cautious founders and executives is that people want income structures that feel modern, transparent, and liquid, and one option in the U.S. that I genuinely find promising is the Stone Ridge LifeX Longevity Income ETFs. I first came across them while helping a client map out a long term retirement strategy, and what stood out was how these funds provide monthly distributions while still allowing investors to keep full liquidity. I remember reviewing the structure and appreciating how it focuses on Treasuries and a long horizon rather than tying someone into an insurance contract. It felt refreshing. many retirees dislike the idea of locking up money permanently, and this approach allowed them to protect their cash while still receiving consistent income. The experience reminded me of moments with founders who want efficiency without losing control, and pattern is similar

In my opinion, the biggest advantage of these longevity ETFs is the balance between predictability and freedom, since investors receive monthly payouts but can still adjust their strategy if life takes an unexpected turn. The main drawback is that there is no lifetime guarantee, so someone who ends up living much longer than expected might outlive the structure if they rely on it too heavily. I often explain that longevity planning still requires layering different tools rather than expecting one product to solve everything. Another point that came up during discussions with retirees is the sensitivity to interest rate changes, which can affect the value of the ETF itself, and it is important not to overlook that risk. Still, for clients who want something more adaptable than an annuity, this has become a strong option to consider. I also pay attention to emerging pooled longevity concepts, similar to modern tontine ideas, which share risk across participants and create higher payouts for those who live longer. Even though these structures are not mainstream in the U.S. yet, the logic is compelling for retirees who expect longer than average lifespans. Whenever I see innovation like this, I feel the same excitement I do when a founder shows us a new model at spectup because it signals that the industry is shifting toward more transparent, flexible solutions.

Niclas Schlopsna, Managing Partner, spectup

——————————————-

LifeX ETFs offer flexible, predictable Retirement Income

Sovic Chakrabarti, Vancouver, BC

When I think about longevity-focused options beyond traditional annuities, one U.S. product I genuinely find compelling is the Stone Ridge LifeX Longevity Income ETFs. What draws me to LifeX is that it tries to solve the same problem that Canadian funds like Purpose Longevity and Guardian Longevity address — steady income over an unknown lifespan — but without locking someone into an irreversible insurance contract.

Instead of handing over capital permanently, retirees stay invested and receive structured monthly distributions, which feels more flexible and respectful of changing needs. I’ve always liked the idea of having income that mimics an annuity while still keeping the door open if health, family, or market circumstances shift.

I’ve come to see LifeX as especially appealing for clients who want predictable cash flow but aren’t comfortable giving up control of their assets. Because the funds are built largely on U.S. Treasuries, the income stream feels relatively stable, and the target-date structure helps align payouts with the later stages of retirement, when longevity risk becomes more real. The liquidity alone makes it feel like a meaningful evolution in retirement planning: it’s easier to sleep at night knowing the money isn’t trapped.

Of course, I’m also realistic about its limitations. There’s no lifetime guarantee the way a true annuity offers, and the income still depends on market and interest-rate dynamics. It’s not a perfect replacement for insurance-based products. But as a complement — or even a middle ground between full guarantees and full market exposure — it’s one of the few newer U.S. longevity products I’d feel confident putting on the table for someone approaching or entering retirement.

Sovic Chakrabarti, Director, Icy Tales

——————————————- Continue Reading…

Unlocking the Annuity Puzzle: why Canadians avoid what seems to be the perfect Retirement vehicle

Image courtesy boomerandecho.com

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column looks at a curious Canadian phenomenon called The Annuity Puzzle: that while life annuities sold by insurance companies seem to have all sorts of compelling reasons to acquire them, more often that not retirees shun them.

You can find the full column by clicking the hypetexted headline here: Unlocking the Annuity Puzzle: Why Canadians avoid what seems to be the perfect retirement vehicle

Financial planner Robb Engen recently tackled this puzzle in his Boomer & Echo blog, illustrated in the above graphic. You can find the full blog here: Why Canadians avoid one of Retirement’s most misunderstood Tools.

Engen notes that experts like Finance professor Moshe Milevesky and retired actuary Fred Vettese say “converting a portion of your savings into guaranteed lifetime income is one of the smartest and most efficient ways to reduce retirement risk.” Vettese has said the math behind an annuity is “pretty compelling,” especially for those without Defined Benefit pensions.

 Engen observes that a life annuity is “the cleanest version of longevity insurance … You hand over a lump sum to an insurer, and they guarantee you monthly income for life. If you live to 100, the insurer pays you. If stock markets collapse, you still get paid. If you’re 87 and never want to look at a portfolio again, the income keeps flowing.”

In other words, annuities neutralize the two big risks that haunt retirees: Longevity Risk (the chance of outliving your money) and Sequence-of-returns risk: the danger of suffering a stock-market meltdown early in Retirement and inflicting irreversible damage on a portfolio.

Despite all the seeming positives about annuities, Engen notes that “almost nobody buys one.” He cites a Vettese estimate that only about 5% of those who could buy an annuity actually do so.

A chance to lock in recent portfolio gains?

Even so, the new Retirement Club created by former Tangerine advisor Dale Roberts earlier this year — see this blog posted on this site in June  — recently featured a guest speaker who extolled the virtues of annuities: Phil Barker of online annuities firm Life Annuities.com Inc. Barker said many clients tell him they’ve done really well in the markets over the last 20 years and now they’d like to lock in some of those gains. They may be looking for Fixed-Income strategies and many were delighted with GIC returns when they were a bit higher than they are now (some in the range of 5%). But they less happy with the new rates on GICs now reaching maturity. Meanwhile, annuities have just come off a 20-year high in November 2023 so the time to consider one has never been better, Barker told the Club in August. With annuities you can lock in a rate for the rest of your life so if your timing is good, it may make sense to allocate some funds to them.

See the full MoneySense column for the list of the eight life insurance companies that offer annuities in Canada, how they are covered under Assuris, when Annuities really shine, and how to fund annuities with registered or non-registered accounts.

 I suspect the Club’s session on annuities was enough to get a few members off the fence. I have long been impressed by the aforementioned Fred Vettese, who often argues that those preparing to convert their RRSPs into RRIFs might opt to annuitize 20 or 30% of the amount, thereby transferring a chunk of investment risk from the do-it-yourself investor on to  the shoulders of a Canadian life insurance company. Continue Reading…

Early Retirement Q&A with Dividend Daddy

By Bob Lai, Tawcan

Special to Financial Independence Hub

The Financial Independence Retire Early (FIRE) community is a very supportive and tight-knit one. Because the community is made up of folks who have different backgrounds and different ages, it’s very diverse (not just Caucasian bros from high tech).

Earlier this year, after having been financially independent for a while, Dividend Daddy decided to step away from work to pursue other passions! Since stepping away from work, Dividend Daddy has been travelling around the globe and enjoying life.

I’m happy to have Dividend Daddy joining me today on the latest Early Retirement Q&A.

Q1: Welcome back Dividend Daddy. Congratulations on reaching FIRE and stepping away from full-time employment. Can you tell us a little bit about yourself? 

 

I’m in my late 40s and Canadian. I worked in high pressure roles for my working career and this January, I pulled the plug on full-time work. With return to office mandates clashing with my desire for work location freedom, work was no longer tenable for me so I stepped away. As of July 2025, I’ve been retired for 7 months and travelling a ton.

Tawcan: Amazing stuff!

Q2: You and I utilize hybrid investing, a combination of individual dividend stocks and low-cost ETFs. What made you decide on utilizing hybrid investing in the first place? 

Replicating the Canadian stock market is super easy so I buy individual Canadian dividend stocks and get the dividend tax credit for doing so.

Internationally, in the U.S. and world, it’s very hard to do that yourself so buying an index fund like $VTI and an ETF like $XAW just makes sense.

Q3:What made you decide to finally pull the plug and step away from full-time employment? Walk me through your decision process.

It was a mix of mental burnout and circumstances at my job that led to my early retirement. Of course, I had done the “math” several times and early retirement was possible financially for me.

Being financially independent meant that I had the control to decide my future. If work arrangements no longer suited my needs, I could walk away from them. So, that’s what I did.

At this stage, I wanted time freedom more than I did the next pay cheque.

Tawcan: that makes a lot of sense. In some level I’m probably there too.

Q4: Tell me more about your plans for this new chapter of your life.

Right now, it’s all about travel. I’m doing a ton of it and I have to say, it’s great without having the stress of work or a job on your mind.

I’m not travelling with a laptop for the first time in a very long time. Just my smartphone. Being untethered from your job while travelling is so very freeing, mentally and physically. It’s wonderful.

Q5: Prior to stepping away from full-time employment, did you do a lot of soul-searching to determine what you plan to do in early retirement? Why is this an important process for early retirement? 

I did do some soul-searching and planning. Nothing rigorous, trusting myself to figure it out. Some planning is important because you suddenly have many more hours in a day and week to fill.

For me, I increased the amount of pickleball I play (when I’m at home), I cycled way more at home and abroad, increased the amount of time I spend at my second home in Mexico (to avoid those nasty Canadian winters), and have been travelling a ton more.

Q6: I know you were considering doing part-time work with your previous employer. Did that ever happen? Why or why not? 

I did not end up doing part-time work with my employer. Circumstances changed at my employer and that flexibility was no longer available.

I may end up doing some very limited consulting in the future but that’s not on the table for 2025 or 2026. I do miss aspects of my work.

Q7: Tell me a bit more about your portfolio withdrawal strategy. I believe you plan on withdrawing from non-registered (N) and registered (R), and leaving TFSA (T) untouched for as long as possible? Are you planning to collapse your RRSP early? Or do you envision converting RRSPs to RRIFs at some point?

Not sure completely yet on strategy but I’ve only been early retired for 7 months as of July 2025. I’m definitely spending dividends from my non-registered account with a cash reserve/bucket of $75,000.

I will reinvest most dividends from my RRSP and all of them from my TFSA. I will need to seek professional advice for what to do with my RRSP going forward and whether spending it down is advisable give tax planning purposes.

Q8: Why is it important to “learn” how to spend money and enjoy life a bit more in retirement rather than a “save-save-and-save-some-more” mentality so many FIRE seekers tend to have? 

Life is short. This hits you as you approach 50 years old. My parents’ generation is starting to pass on and I know I’m next in line (hopefully a long way off still). Continue Reading…

How much do they need to save and invest to retire with $110,000 annual income?

 

By Dale Roberts, CutTheCrap Investing, Retirement Club

Special to Financial Independence Hub

A recent Globe & Mail article laid out a retirement and investment challenge? A couple in their mid-fifties had a combined million dollar portfolio. They wondered if they could retire at age 65, while maintaining their annual income. How much would they have to save and invest to allow for that income level in retirement? I read through the comment section of that post. It became apparent that many or most Canadians who are DIY (Do It Yourself) investors are not aware of the free tools available that will allow them to calculate their savings requirement and how to estimate their potential spend rate in retirement. Let’s take a look at how they might create $110,000 in annual income.

Here’s the link (subscription required) to the Globe & Mail article –

Is a million dollars enough for us if we maintain our current lifestyle?

Keep in mind that not many details were provided and the SunLife financial planner consulted for the article did not offer up any details on the required savings rate or how they would generate the income. This is the first reader comment you’ll see on the post …

That was the least helpful one of these types of articles that I have seen in a long time. No numbers and very little detail. “Try to save as much as you can in the most tax-efficient way now and for the future”. No mention of CPP amounts, OAS amounts, tax rates, withdrawal strategies, etc . The link to the SunLife infomercial was a low point.

That pretty much nails it. I was curious, so I thought I would take a quick run at it.

Here was the question submitted …

Is a million dollars enough for the two of us, both in our mid-50s, to retire on if we maintain our current lifestyle and work until we are 65? Our household income is currently $150,000. Is there a percentage of income you recommend as an annual savings goal until we reach that retirement age?

How do you calculate your required savings rate?

From the article, it is likely that the couple has a combined $150,000 in annual income before taxes. To make things more interesting and challenging, I’ll crunch some numbers to generate $150,000 in after tax income. I’ll use Ontario for a tax rate and tax treatment.

To estimate the required savings rate I will use testfolio and a simple savings calculator.

I will run the Retirement Cash Flow Plan using MayRetire.

Both are free-use calculators that we cover and demonstrate at Retirement Club for Canadians. Check out that link if you want to learn more, or if you’re looking to sign up. We are starting a new group, now.

While you can use a ‘full ‘and very robust retirement calculator such as Optiml or Adviice for estimating the savings needs, you can certainly find your number by way of using a basic savings calculator or investment calculator, such as Portfolio Visualizer and testfolio. I found Optiml very difficult to use.

That said, you will first need to discover the portfolio value required to generate that desired income level.

How much do you need to create $150,000 income?

Canadians will typically generate retirement around these 3 pillars.

Retirement Club

For our scenario, we’ll assume there are no employer pensions in the mix. We will give the couple very generous Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Old Age Security (OAS) amounts. A Canadian couple can generate over $50,000 of annual income from those government sources. And at age 65, taxes might not start to bite until after the first $54,000. That is a wonderful ‘tax free’ head start. We can call that our pensionable earnings. It is guaranteed income that is inflation-adjusted. Certainly, one can argue that OAS may be at risk due to the costs to the federal balance sheet. We might get some more clues this week when the current government delivers their first budget. That said, most of the calls are for reducing OAS benefits for “wealthy” seniors.

To maximize those government benefits Canadian retirees might look to the RRSP / RRIF meltdown strategy.

The RRSP / RRIF meltdown. A Canadian retiree’s greatest hack?

With the meltdown strategy we delay CPP and OAS to allow for the much greater payments. The strategy can also allow for greater tax efficiency, and it might allow you to manage any OAS claw back. If we make too much, we can lose all or some of those OAS payments.

Creating $150,000 in annual after-tax income

MayRetire revealed that the couple would need about $2.8 million to $3 million to create $150,000 in annual after tax income. Of course we have to account for inflation when estimating the savings rate and the spending rate in retirement. You can set your Province for tax treatment, of course.

MayRetire is very intuitive and quite easy to use. You enter your investment assets for yourself, or yourself and your spouse (if with spouse) and set your CPP and OAS amounts and start dates, enter any employer pensions, real estate income and any special income. You’ll enter your plan end date, rate of return, inflation rate and desired income. You can adjust your RRSP / RRIF meltdown rate using 5 presets. If you need to tailor your meltdown their is a custom strategy feature.

You press Calculate to run your model.

It is not that difficult to enter portfolio amounts and desired income to quickly get a sense of the portfolio level required. And be sure to click on that Simulate button that will stress test your portfolio model (Monte Carlo simulations). For example, when I tested a $2,000,000 portfolio looking to generate $150,000 of annual income. There was only a 2% success rate. We want to get into the 80% success rate and beyond. The simulations are quite ‘bearish’ according to MayRetire creator Boris Rozinov, so 80% and beyond is a good starting point.

Here’s a must read with “THE” chart on spend rates – Creating retirement income from your portfolio

I simply added greater portfolio asset amounts (while somewhat optimizing the RRSP / RRIF meltdown strategy and CPP and OAS dates) until I reached a favourable success rate.

Of course for those new to retirement calculators it will take several hours to even get a basic feel for how the calculator works and how retirement cash flow plans take shape. But it is a wonderful and more than interesting experience. Learning how to optimize and match your cash flow plan to your life plan will take more time, indeed. But it is all more than time well spent for the DIY retiree. It is essential that we run a cash flow calculator. You might ‘find’ hundreds of thousands of dollars of additional retirement income.

At Retirement Club we’re showing members how to use MayRetire and other calculators.

Check out the Retirement Club Overview

If you’re not up for learning the retirement cash flow ropes you might consider an advice-only planner who is a retirement specialist. You’ll get conflict-free advice from planners who are not attached to any investment products. aka – they are not selling.

Let me know if you want a few names to consider.

The $150,000 retirement income plan

Here’s what the spending plan looked like. Keep in mind this is ‘back of napkin’ initial projections. The cash flow plan will match your life plan and greater financial plan that includes your estate planning. Your longevity projections will factor in. You may decide to spend heavily in the early go-go years, and then decrease spending in the slow-go years. You might need an income boost in the late-stage years. We’d call that a U-shaped spending plan, or you-shaped. You might also have special items that factor in such as a home or cottage sale, business sale, inheritance and more. You will factor that into your retirement cash flow plan. At MayRetire you can enter special items for income and spending. Those special items can be set for a period as well; 15 years for the go-go years, for example, 10 years for the no-go years.

I ran the plan to age 95. When a couple both reach age 65 there is a 30% chance that one of them will live to age 95.

The red and turquoise bars represent the couples RRSP / RRIF accounts, the purple bar is combined TFSA income creation. We see the CPP (Orange) and OAS (Blue) kick in at age 70. The tax rate is above 22%, but will drop to a very low level at age 87 when the TFSA does the heavy lifting, topping up the CPP and OAS amounts.

Here’s how the accounts will ‘spend down’ in retirement. Yes, there is a massive TFSA shown, remaining at age 95. This is the funding ‘math’ when you run returns in linear fashion without market stress. That TFSA could be greatly decreased by a considerable recession and market correction(s). That said, the possible spend rate could also be higher.

Call this a buffer. Remember, your spending plan will be variable due to life events and market returns. And it’s wise to embrace a variable send rate. We might be prepared to spend less if we run into a period of market stress. MayRetire allows you to test that strategy.

Given the massive $3 million portfolio requirement (in inflation adjusted dollars) the required savings rate would be considerable, and likely not doable for a couple with $150,000 gross income. The savings projection was based on balanced to balanced growth portfolio returns of 6%-8%. Given that, let’s move on to creating a more modest after tax income goal – $110,000. That would be closer to what our $150,000 gross income couple takes home.

Longevity Stuff

You’ll find more on longevity in the Purpose Longevity Pension Fund post, and here’s a chart on probabilities of reaching age 90 and longer, from Fred Vettese.

Creating $110,000 retirement income after tax

MayRetire shows that a $1,500,000 portfolio, working in concert with CPP and OAS could deliver $110,000 in after tax income. The retirees each have $600,000 in an RRSP account and $150,000 in a TFSA. Continue Reading…

How to navigate a market bubble

Image: Pexels courtesy MyOwnAdvisor

 

By Mark Seed, myownadvisor

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Inspiration for this headline this week came from a Globe and Mail article.

For those without the subscription like I have, here are the key ways to navigate any stock market bubble that might be forming.

Curious to get your thoughts on what you are thinking about and doing as we head into 2026 …

 

 

1.) Cut back on dividend reinvestment plans/DRIPs. In doing so, you are raising your cash/cash equivalents pile. (I have been doing that since 2024.) From the article: “Rather than purchase more shares at these possibly elevated prices, I will accumulate some cash and deploy as opportunities present themselves,” one reader said.”

2.) Trim individual stock holdings. While holding individual stocks can be amazing for income and growth, I know they also expose me to some concentration risks: company or sector risks. So, to avoid that, I can trim individual holdings and simply index invest: instead. From the article: “I have felt a U.S. equity bubble has been forming for over a year now. In January, I decided to sell all my individual U.S. stock holdings and move the funds into my S&P 500 ETF,” one reader said.” (Yup, see link below, what I have done.)

3.) Hold more cash. Aligned to #1, and have done this as well. We’re about 90% equities and 10% cash/cash equivalents entering retirement in spring 2026. I may even increase my cash allocation from here since almost all DRIPs are turned off for cashflow now…

What approaches are you taking? Other steps? Happy to read and learn more…

Surviving a Recession

These tips are not unlike surviving a recession, if one were to say, happen, in 2026.

Some sensible advice in this MoneySense article on moving your RRSP to a RRIF. I already used these basics years ago when establishing my parents RRIFs for them.

  1. Consider “bucketing” to manage withdrawals:  Set a portion of your RRIF aside in something with no or very little risk that can be used for withdrawals. That way, the advisor suggests “…if the overall market takes a downturn, clients aren’t forced to sell investments at a loss because they need the cash.”
  2. Consider funding the TFSA with unspent money:  “Just because you are taking the money out of a RRIF account doesn’t mean you have to spend it.”  Yes, correct. This is why I set up my parents’ RRIF withdrawals, annually, early in the year: so whatever they don’t need to spend from their RRIF each year can go directly to their TFSAs, where money can continue to grow tax-free for any longevity spending or other emergency needs down the line.

Simple concepts that can also apply to RRSP withdrawals too for any early retirees… Continue Reading…