Decumulate & Downsize

Most of your investing life you and your adviser (if you have one) are focused on wealth accumulation. But, we tend to forget, eventually the whole idea of this long process of delayed gratification is to actually spend this money! That’s decumulation as opposed to wealth accumulation. This stage may also involve downsizing from larger homes to smaller ones or condos, moving to the country or otherwise simplifying your life and jettisoning possessions that may tie you down.

How do you intend to retire?

Posted By |

By Mark Seed, myownadvisor

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Unless you go back in time, retirement no longer means stopping all forms of work from the factory job: Retirement means different things to different people.

While there remains a formal definition of retirement (in that there is the action of leaving one’s job or ceasing to work) retirement has many flavours these days. The traditional definition has evolved and no longer fits what people are doing and seeking.

As I approach retirement from my own career at the end of March 2026, I wondered how you intend to retire.

How do you intend to retire?

The rise of standardized work during the 20th century coupled with an abundance of industrialized or corporate jobs gave rise to pension plans as a key employee attraction and retention benefit. So, you worked hard for 30-35 years and then you retired with your pension as part of the long-term total compensation model: a model that remains in place to today.

Defined benefit (DB) pensions give retirees fixed lifelong monthly payments based on salary and a years of service formula. Some DB plans even offer a degree of indexing to fight inflation. But all DB plans represent a premium form of dependable retirement income that is not subject to financial market drama: since the financial risk is on the employer and not on the employee or retiree.

But times are a changing …

The long retreat of DB employee benefits has been well documented, shifts have occurred in the employer-employee dynamic involving unions along with shifts in the job market to industries where a DB pension is simply just not offered.

Canada’s retirement income system is often described as having three pillars, although variations exist.

The first pillar provides benefits based on age and years of residence in Canada: so it includes the Old Age Security (OAS) pension, the Guaranteed Income Supplement ((GIS), if that applies to you for lower-income folks), the Allowance and the Age Credit. This first pillar is funded largely through general tax revenues.

The second pillar consists of mandatory earnings‑related programs so you can put the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and, in Quebec, the Quebec Pension Plan (QPP) in that bucket. These are public pensions, funded by mandatory contributions from workers and employers, as well as income from investments made with these contributions.

And finally the third pillar is composed of the aforementioned workplace pension or as the workplace employee compensation model continues to shift, it could be a Group RRSP or another form of employee compensation as well. “Private” retirement income planning may also include your own assets: RRSPs, TFSAs, LIRAs and any non-registered investments.

Weekend Reading - Your retirement income sources

Source: Government of Canada.

I share this information for context when it comes to the following types of retirement you might pursue: how you intend to retire. Your path to retirement could be one or more of these types below.

1. Traditional Retirement

I define this as follows: you work for decades on end uninterrupted and you stop working for good. During this period of time, you might have contributed to a DB or Defined Contribution (DC) pension plan or not at all.

If you had a pension, the automatic savings nature of any workplace pension would be very good for most people — this “forced savings approach” is a huge benefit unto itself – pay yourself first as per The Wealthy Barber.

If you had a pension (the golden handcuffs idea) and depending on the type of pension you have, pension income gets paid out in different ways at retirement. Some plans cannot start before a certain age while others can be accessed earlier. Depending on your retirement-income goals this flexibility (or lack of flexibility) is an important consideration in your financial plan: one I’ve struggled with myself.

There are many benefits to traditional retirement by remaining with one key employer for decades on end (i.e., work stability; the guaranteed pension income for life; don’t have to take too much personal investment risk; could be other workplace retirement benefits like health benefits, travel benefits or life insurance benefits) but traditional retirement also seems to come at a personal cost of trading your life energy for employer time for many decades.

The traditional path to retirement may not work for many people these days. It did not work for me.

2. Semi-Retirement

I define this as follows: you want to pursue some form of life-work balance.

This was in fact something important for my wife and I to try out in 2024 and 2025:  so we did.

My wife toggled back and forth between full-time and part-time work up until her retirement in October 2025.

I continue to enjoy my part-time role at work (until the end of March 2026): I wanted to remain with my employer for a bit, still contribute, just in a reduced capacity.

After I retire from my current career, I might still work (gasp!) but only a few days per week or a few days per month. We shall see.

I will continue to blog here for another year or so too and this site doesn’t make minimum wage: I enjoy running it.

Semi-retirement is not about income but it may include some small financial compensation for doing something you really enjoy/want to pursue: trading your time or energy for some income.

This path and related definition of retirement has always appealed to me and much more so than just early retirement and not working again.

3. Early Retirement

Some bloggers or FinFluencers might express this is a “better way” to retire but when you really think about it: nobody in their 30s or 40s really retires early and never works again. I haven’t met one of them yet.

They continue to work for some income and many do so on their passion projects. Nothing wrong with that of course, being an entrepreneur, you just need to be honest with folks vs. selling some dream as you hustle a book or a podcast or something else to support your lifestyle.

In Your Money or Your Life, author Vicki Robin equates ample savings (and investments) with freedom. This means you have the freedom “to leave your job if the boss is intolerable or the benefits have just been yanked.”  With sufficient savings (and investments) you have the opportunity to transform your life, including achieving Financial Independence if you want to.

Robin likens financially independent thinking to cartography: you need to create your own map. Your map will depict the delta between your life today and the one you want to lead. The results of financially independent thinking will allow you to step back from your assumptions and emotions about money and observe them objectively.

The concepts related to early retirement are not new but certainly lots of modern social media marketing have propelled this thinking into a new discussions and forums.

I’m a big fan of financial independence, just not any Retire-early part of FIRE marketing.

4. Mini-Retirements

Popularized by Tim Ferriss’ 2007 bestseller, The 4-Hour Workweek, Ferriss proposes you redistribute your retirement over many decades. Other books and articles have suggested the same over the years.

In this form of retirement you work in bursts or stints. For example, you might work for a few years and then take a few years off work only to work yet again.

When it comes to mini-retirements, I’ve considered this approach but quickly dismissed it since I was always more focused on my crossover point and becoming financially independent vs. needing to work to fund periodic time off only to work again …

Crossover Point

We realized our crossover point in 2024.

In doing so, that allowed us to start shifting both of our workplace schedules to part-time as part of a transition to retirement sooner than most.

How do you intend to retire?

The answer to this question is very personal and quite subjective.

Which type of retirement is right for you?

“It depends” is the common personal finance answer to pretty much everything but it’s so true.

Traditional retirement never appealed to me nor did any sort of mini-retirement either. So, I guess I’ve opted for the semi-retirement path and if you want to suggest that I’m an early retiree well that’s probably somewhat correct too.

Your financial planning and retirement income planning will depend on many personal factors but the ingredients to any retirement or some form of financial independence are pretty generic:

  1. Spend less than you make and invest the difference: This obvious expert advice really never goes out of style. A high, consistent savings rate is a get wealthy eventually path to retirement.
  2. Kill all high-interest debt and remove all debt from you life when you can: Debt management comes in the form of removing ongoing credit card debt, killing off high interest loans, and managing any other consumer debt well. If you are always paying other people first it will be hard to get ahead in life.
  3. Educate yourself / gain financial literacy over time: Another obvious truth but it’s critical to educate yourself so you develop a better understanding of not only how to manage your finances but also the motivations of others around you. Otherwise, you will pay other people lots of money to do your financial thinking for you.

Whether you are in the early days of your financial journey, preparing for retirement, or successfully in retirement, I would be happy to learn what is working for you. How do you intend to retire? How did you retire?

Leave a comment below. I look forward to your engagement.

Yours in happy planning and celebrations for what lies ahead in 2026.

Happy New Year!

Mark

Weekend Reading - Expenses that may disappear edition

Source: Carl Richards, Behavior Gap.

Mark Seed is a passionate DIY investor who lives in Ottawa.  He invests in Canadian and U.S. dividend paying stocks and low-cost Exchange Traded Funds on his quest to own a $1 million portfolio for an early retirement. You can follow Mark’s insights and perspectives on investing, and much more, by visiting My Own Advisor. This blog originally appeared on his site on Dec. 31, 2025 and is republished on Findependence Hub with his permission.

How to Decide which Canadian Bank Stocks are Best for You

Posted By |

Canadian bank stocks are true blue chip stocks and have long been a top choice for growth and income. Today’s economic uncertainty doesn’t change that

Image courtesy TSInetwork.ca

We’ve long recommended that all Canadian investors own two or more of the Big Five Canadian bank stocks — Bank of Nova Scotia, Bank of Montreal, CIBC, TD Bank and Royal Bank. That’s mainly because of the importance of these institutions, and their blue chip stocks, to Canada’s economy. That hasn’t changed despite lingering economic uncertainty about high inflation. Investing in bank stocks remains a popular strategy for many Canadians.

Canadian bank stocks – unlike Canadian penny stocks – remain key lower-risk investments. As well, the Big Five Canadian bank stocks all have long histories of annual dividend increases. That makes the Big Five the best bank stocks that the country has to offer. It also makes them top blue chip stocks for income investors.

Picking the best bank stock between two of Canada’s big banks is a lot harder choice than choosing between a bank stock and a Canadian penny stock. Still, if you’ve decided to start by investing in bank stocks with just one Canadian bank, one key question remains: which Canadian bank is the best bank stock for you? How can you tell which bank will give you the best long-term performance? There are a few performance clues you can look out for.

Performance clues to look for

When deciding on the best bank stock to buy, you want to start with the same criteria you would use for any investment in blue chip stocks (as well as with a Canadian penny stock):

We believe Canadian bank stocks are still well-positioned to weather downturns in the Canadian economy, despite their significant increases in loan-loss provisions over the last couple years because of COVID, the inflation that followed, and its impact on the economy. All five stocks trade at attractive multiples to earnings and are well positioned for any economic fallout from continuing high interest rates. Investing in bank stocks remains a popular strategy for many Canadians.

Canadian bank stocks have always been some of the best bank stocks globally. They’re also among the best income-producing securities: true blue chip stocks. Below are 3 tips for using dividends as barometer for picking Canadian bank stocks when investing in bank stocks.

1.) Dividends are a sign of investment quality. It’s why so few Canadian penny stocks offer them. While some good banks reinvest a major part of their profits instead of paying dividends, failing banks hardly ever pay dividends. So if you only buy stocks that pay dividends, you’ll automatically stay out of almost all the market’s worst banks.

2.) Dividends can grow. Stock prices rise and fall, so capital losses often follow capital gains, at least temporarily. Interest on a bond or GIC holds steady, at best. But the best banks like to ratchet their dividends upward: hold them steady in a bad year, raise them in a good one. That also gives you a hedge against inflation.

For a true measure of stability when hunting for the best bank stocks, focus on banks that have maintained or raised their dividends during economic and stock market downturns. These banks leave themselves enough room to handle periods of earnings volatility. By continually rewarding investors, and retaining enough cash to finance their businesses, they provide an attractive mix of safety, income and growth. Canadian banks stocks are well known for their financial stability in the face of economic downturns.

3.) Look for Canadian bank stocks with consistent dividends. One of the best ways of picking a quality stock is to look for banks that have been paying dividends for at least 5 to 10 years. Dividends are cash outlays that an unsuccessful bank could never produce. A history of dividend payments is one trait that all the best dividend stocks have.

Don’t limit your investing to bank stocks

Simply put, a well-constructed stock portfolio will make your life easier and maximize your gains.

Early in their investing careers, many investors have only a vague idea of the value of a planned portfolio when investing in the stock market. Continue Reading…

What if you run out of life? Save-Spend balance

Posted By |
Mrs. T and I went on an Alaska cruise years ago, before kids and had a great time.

By Bob Lai, Tawcan

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Let’s be honest here, inflation is real. Very real! Despite being as frugal and careful with our expenses as possible, we are seeing an increase in our living expenses; arguably, just like everyone else.

Unfortunately, many of these expenses are completely outside of our control …

  • We were just informed by the city that our property tax increased by 11.5% this year
  • Our monthly equalized Fortis-BC payment increased by 20% due to natural gas rate adjustments
  • Gas prices recently hit over $2 per litre
  • Groceries cost way more now. I mean, a bag of Hardbite chips is over $5, and avocado costs $2 at regular price? What is this, highway robbery?

Let’s not forget the rising interest rates, leading to higher mortgage payments.

And those are just core expenses. Now if we consider discretionary expenses as well …

  • It’s not unusual to see hotels at over $250 per night, or even over $300 and even $400! In fact, recently a lawyer complained about the hotel prices in Vancouver. And is not alone!
Tweet 1
  • Staying at an Airbnb is just as costly and sometimes it costs even more than staying at a regular hoteltweet 2
  • Airfares are far more expensive than pre-COVID. Good luck finding tickets to Europe for under $1,000 per person.
  • Dining out is more expensive. A bowl of ramen costs close to $20 with taxes and tips added. We spent over $120 for the four of us dining out at a local White Spot last month, and we only had burgers, a couple of milkshakes, and a dessert to share.

You get the picture. At this point, I wouldn’t be surprised that our 2023 annual expenses will be considerably higher than the previous years.

Feeling frustrated with our expenses

The other day I was looking at our budget/expense tracking spreadsheet. To my horror, I noticed that we have been overspending in our Play account by a significant margin. To be more specific, we have dined out far more so far in 2023 than in other years. We have had three months where we spent over $1,000 on dining out! (On average, we usually spend around $350 on dining out per month)

While I know we’ve spent big money on a few occasions, like Kid T2.0’s birthday dinner with 15 people, a big dim sum lunch with 9 people, dinners a few times in Whistler with Mrs. T’s family, Mrs. T’s birthday lunch with 11 people, and celebrating our wedding anniversary, I was surprised to see that we spent over $1,000 on dining out for May.

Sure, we ate out multiple times during our recent 4-day trip in Calgary, but that was around $500 in total. I couldn’t explain how we spent the other $500.

I was frustrated and bummed out about spending so much money dining out yet again. For the life of me, I couldn’t figure out how we spent the other $500. I did recall having takeout sushi for about $120 but I couldn’t think of other dining-out occasions.

After going through the credit-card statements and spreadsheet, I realized we have had many smaller dining out expenses. $20 here and there, $30 here and there, and the amount quickly added up.

During this frustrated & annoyed state, the only thing I could think of was that we needed to take some extreme action.

“No dining out or take-outs for June!” I declared to Mrs. T.

“And what do you plan to spend our money on?” Mrs. T asked.

I couldn’t answer her question at all. All I could think of is that we need to reduce our spending, so we can save more. I think deep inside I was worried that we’d run out of money because of the increase in our overall expenses.

Even with me writing about having a save-spend balance (i.e. spending money to enjoy the present moment and saving money for the future), all I could think of are…

Save! Save! SAVE!

Unfortunately, my save, save, save, and save some more mentality was creeping in very quickly.

What the heck is going on here? Continue Reading…

Contradictory Retirement Plans

Posted By |

By Michael J. Wiener

Special to Financial Independence Hub

I get a lot of friends and family asking for help figuring out their retirement finances when they’re just a few years from retiring.  These discussions follow a common pattern: people say they want to spend more in their 60s while they’re still able to enjoy new experiences, but they make plans that involve spending less in their 60s than they will have available in their 70s and beyond.  They resist a simple idea even after I show them how much more they could be spending early on.

I’ll illustrate what’s going on with an example that borrows from some of the real cases I’ve helped with.

Meet Dan

Dan is a single guy about to retire at 60.  Here are his relevant financial details:

TFSA: $200,000
RRSP: $300,000
Pension: $4000/month indexed to inflation + $800/month bridge until he is 65
CPP: entitled to 90% of the maximum amount ($826 at 60, $1290 at 65, $1832 at 70)
OAS: entitled to the full amount ($740 at 65, $1006 at 70, 10% increase at 75)

Dan tried to work out what to do on his own initially.  His thinking was mostly short term.  To compensate for his drop in income when he retires, he would take his CPP right away, and take his OAS at 65.  He wants some money to do some traveling over the next decade, and his work pension isn’t enough.

Here’s a chart of Dan’s inflation-adjusted income based on these plans.  Note that in nominal terms, his income will go up with inflation each year, but we show it in constant 2025 dollars.

The first thing to notice is that Dan hasn’t included his RRSP or TFSA in these plans.  He didn’t really think about them; he just assumes that they are for “later.”  By default, Dan will have to convert his RRSP to a RRIF when he’s 71, and will have to start drawing from the RRIF when he’s 72.  Let’s add in Dan’s RRIF income, assuming conservatively that his RRSP/RRIF will earn 2% above inflation.

We see now that contrary to Dan’s stated goal of having more income for traveling in his 60s, he’s actually planning to live small in his 60s.  This is the point where I suggest starting to draw from his RRSP/RRIF right from the start of retirement.

Immediately, we run into a problem.  Dan doesn’t think of himself as the sort of person who spends his RRSP.  That’s for old people.  He doesn’t feel very old.  He doesn’t like this idea.  He’s still the kind of person who saves money.

Not everyone can get past this point.  Some live small for years to give themselves a large income in their 70s and beyond.  Let’s hope that Dan can get used to the idea of starting to live now.  Here’s a plan that smooths out Dan’s RRSP/RRIF income: Continue Reading…

Beyond Annuities: Innovative Longevity Products for Retirees

Posted By |
Deposit Photos

Below we canvas 11 retirement experts and financial planners in Canada and the United States about how they and their clients can use new Longevity insurance products above and beyond traditional life annuities.

These experts were gathered by Featured.com, which has been supplying Findependence Hub with quality content for several years. It recently changed its procedure so editors like myself can request input on particular topics we think will interest our readership. The sources are all on LinkedIn, as you can see by clicking on their profiles below.

Here’s what we asked for this instalment:

 “In addition to Annuities, what is one new Longevity product or fund that you believe in enough to recommend to clients approaching or already in Retirement? Examples in Canada are Purpose Longevity Fund and Guardian’s Longevity Funds. Are there similar new products in the U.S. (or Canada) of which  you are aware?”

Here is what these 11 thought leaders had to say:

LifeX ETF delivers transparent Longevity Income

In addition to traditional annuities, one of the emerging longevity products in the U.S. that I have come to recommend to clients approaching or already in retirement is the LifeX Longevity Income ETF, particularly the LFAI fund.

While it is not a classic insurance product, it is designed to provide predictable monthly distributions over a long horizon, effectively hedging against the risk of outliving one’s assets. The fund invests primarily in U.S. Treasuries and money-market instruments, and its structure is built around the concept of a target cohort’s 100th birthday, which allows for a systematic income stream without relying on a life insurance company guarantee.

For many clients, especially those who purchased assets during low-interest periods or are seeking reliable cash flow without tying up their entire portfolio in an annuity, this product offers a compelling complement to their existing retirement income strategy. What I find particularly valuable is the transparency it provides. Unlike certain annuities, clients can clearly see the underlying investments, understand how distributions are generated, and retain the flexibility to adjust allocations as their personal circumstances or market conditions evolve.

It also fits naturally into a broader retirement strategy where a portion of assets remains growth-oriented, some is allocated to defensive income-generating investments, and a dedicated longevity-income segment addresses the specific risk of living decades beyond retirement.

Of course, it is not without considerations; while the fund aims to provide stable income, it is sensitive to interest-rate changes, inflation, and the assumptions built into its cohort-based design. Clients need to assess the fit carefully, ensuring the time horizon and income targets align with their health, lifestyle, and other holdings. For those who understand these dynamics, however, it offers a sophisticated and innovative approach to longevity planning, bridging the gap between traditional annuities and fully self-managed income portfolios, and giving retirees confidence that they can sustain their lifestyle even as they live longer than expected.

Andrew Izrailo, Senior Corporate and Fiduciary Manager, Astra Trust

BlackRock LifePath Paycheck Fund Offers Flexibility

JP Moses, Tennessee

If you’re getting close to retirement, you might want to check out the BlackRock LifePath Paycheck fund. I’ve been following it. It works like those Canadian longevity funds, designed to give you regular monthly checks. The biggest risk is outliving your savings, and this fund has professionals handle the withdrawals so you don’t run out of money. It seems to offer more flexibility than a traditional annuity, which is worth a look.

JP Moses, President & Director of Content Awesomely, Awesomely

——————————————-

Vanguard and Fidelity Deliver Stable Retirement Income

Evan Tunis, Florida

The Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund is not an entirely new “longevity” product in the mold of Canada’s Purpose and Guardian funds, but it fulfills a similar role for retirees. It is intended to deliver a steady flow of income while protecting against the effects of inflation by investing in a diversified blend of stocks, bonds and cash. The Fidelity Strategic Advisers (r) Core Income Fund is also designed to provide income for retirees with a diversified approach. The two funds both provide some level of stability for those who want to keep a lid on risk and market vomit in retirement.

Evan Tunis, President, Florida Healthcare Insurance

——————————————-

Modern LifeX ETFs balance Freedom and Income

Niclas Schlopsna, Germany

I’ve often been asked about newer longevity products beyond traditional annuities, especially by clients preparing for retirement who want flexibility without giving up stability. What I have observed while working with financially cautious founders and executives is that people want income structures that feel modern, transparent, and liquid, and one option in the U.S. that I genuinely find promising is the Stone Ridge LifeX Longevity Income ETFs. I first came across them while helping a client map out a long term retirement strategy, and what stood out was how these funds provide monthly distributions while still allowing investors to keep full liquidity. I remember reviewing the structure and appreciating how it focuses on Treasuries and a long horizon rather than tying someone into an insurance contract. It felt refreshing. many retirees dislike the idea of locking up money permanently, and this approach allowed them to protect their cash while still receiving consistent income. The experience reminded me of moments with founders who want efficiency without losing control, and pattern is similar

In my opinion, the biggest advantage of these longevity ETFs is the balance between predictability and freedom, since investors receive monthly payouts but can still adjust their strategy if life takes an unexpected turn. The main drawback is that there is no lifetime guarantee, so someone who ends up living much longer than expected might outlive the structure if they rely on it too heavily. I often explain that longevity planning still requires layering different tools rather than expecting one product to solve everything. Another point that came up during discussions with retirees is the sensitivity to interest rate changes, which can affect the value of the ETF itself, and it is important not to overlook that risk. Still, for clients who want something more adaptable than an annuity, this has become a strong option to consider. I also pay attention to emerging pooled longevity concepts, similar to modern tontine ideas, which share risk across participants and create higher payouts for those who live longer. Even though these structures are not mainstream in the U.S. yet, the logic is compelling for retirees who expect longer than average lifespans. Whenever I see innovation like this, I feel the same excitement I do when a founder shows us a new model at spectup because it signals that the industry is shifting toward more transparent, flexible solutions.

Niclas Schlopsna, Managing Partner, spectup

——————————————-

LifeX ETFs offer flexible, predictable Retirement Income

Sovic Chakrabarti, Vancouver, BC

When I think about longevity-focused options beyond traditional annuities, one U.S. product I genuinely find compelling is the Stone Ridge LifeX Longevity Income ETFs. What draws me to LifeX is that it tries to solve the same problem that Canadian funds like Purpose Longevity and Guardian Longevity address — steady income over an unknown lifespan — but without locking someone into an irreversible insurance contract.

Instead of handing over capital permanently, retirees stay invested and receive structured monthly distributions, which feels more flexible and respectful of changing needs. I’ve always liked the idea of having income that mimics an annuity while still keeping the door open if health, family, or market circumstances shift.

I’ve come to see LifeX as especially appealing for clients who want predictable cash flow but aren’t comfortable giving up control of their assets. Because the funds are built largely on U.S. Treasuries, the income stream feels relatively stable, and the target-date structure helps align payouts with the later stages of retirement, when longevity risk becomes more real. The liquidity alone makes it feel like a meaningful evolution in retirement planning: it’s easier to sleep at night knowing the money isn’t trapped.

Of course, I’m also realistic about its limitations. There’s no lifetime guarantee the way a true annuity offers, and the income still depends on market and interest-rate dynamics. It’s not a perfect replacement for insurance-based products. But as a complement — or even a middle ground between full guarantees and full market exposure — it’s one of the few newer U.S. longevity products I’d feel confident putting on the table for someone approaching or entering retirement.

Sovic Chakrabarti, Director, Icy Tales

——————————————- Continue Reading…