General

A Q&A with the founders of the new Prosperium Cryptocurrency

Posted By |
Prosperium Inc. CEO Doug Coyle (L); President and COO Tony Humble (R)

The following is a sponsored Q&A with the founders of the firm behind Canada’s new Prosperium cyryptocurrency.

Tony Humble is President and Chief Organizational Officer of Toronto-based Prosperium Inc. and Doug Coyle is Chief Executive Officer (both pictured on the left).

You can find the introductory blog in this series by clicking on Blockchain Revolution, Global Prosperity and Prosperium.  

Also, a new white paper has just been published. The overall Prosperous business model is described on its home page. And for a layperson’s perspective, see Tony’s blog. 

The Q&A will continue tomorrow. 

 

Jon Chevreau: In the first blog, we mentioned Ethereum and Prospereum as two examples of cryptocurrencies spawned in Canada. Clearly, the name Ethereum inspired your name and it was a clever stroke to get the word Prosper in there too. Can you confirm this genesis of the name?

Tony Humble

Tony Humble: Well, the name Prosperium was a natural, but we tried a few others first, like Prosperus, as in “prosper us all” and “prosperous” and ProsperX.  But the elemental affinity with Ethereum was irresistible:  like atomic bonds.  Ethereum is named for both a celestial region and an “element” in the periodic table.  On earth, it is both a currency and a platform for smart blockchain contracts: revolutionary and brilliant.

Jon: Can you elaborate on what the name means in practice, relative to Ethereum? Is it the same business model?

Tony: Like Bitcoin, the total number of coins issued by Etherium will be fixed, aiming for continuous growth in value.  In comparison, Prosperium is also named as an element, is a crypto-currency, and is a platform:  for growth in real prosperity.  In contrast, however, once Prosperium has reached a target value it will be fixed in price and supported at that value, but the number of coins issued will continue to grow.  It will be minted for measurable value, created by regional accelerators to generate jobs and production, and its use for transactional purposes will be tracked on the Prosperium blockchain.  It will be 100% open and auditable by governments, and will maintain a large reserve to support the price in the marketplace.

Jon: A prospectus for Canada’s first Bitcoin ETF was recently filed. I’m not sure if that shows your timing is impeccable or whether you’re late to the party?

Doug Coyle: I do see that there are more and more ETF funds being launched in Canada and around the world for Bitcoin.

Jon: Starting with the Winklevoss twins of Facebook fame?

Doug: Yes, they tried to get a Bitcoin ETF going and ran into some barriers but they prepared the ground a great deal. I feel it’s adding infrastructure so I’m in favor of multiple ETFs for Bitcoin or any other crypto currency being established.

Jon: Is Prosperium going that route?

Doug: Not directly. In some ways we do provide the ability for clients who hold Prosperium tokens to trade those tokens and eventually the currency itself will be freely trading; so we have a very sophisticated way of doing a — call it an ETF — but we hold a reserve account that is core to how we stabilize the Prosperium coin. Buyers can find a ready market there at all times; they don’t have to count on any broker to find a match on buying and selling; it’s all done automatically in the software.

Why Prosperium isn’t going the ICO route

Jon: You chose not to go the ICO (Initial Coin Offering) route although it sounds like you were thinking about it. Why not, or are you doing the same thing under a different name? Continue Reading…

How to “Liberate your Losers” from your RRSP to later save tax

Posted By |
Getty/iStock

It is admittedly a complex strategy but the Globe & Mail’s Report on Business has just published my latest article for high-net-worth investors who don’t mind trading RRSP losses today for tax savings tomorrow. You can retrieve it by clicking on the highlighted headline here: An RRSP strategy to ‘liberate your losers” in order to save tax.

The article is a followup to an earlier Globe article I ran late in the summer, which was summarized in this Hub blog: The ‘Nice” problem of million-dollar RRSPs. 

Liberating your Losers is a phrase used by a broker source of mine who prefers for now not to be identified. The strategy describes a possible bright side to crystalizing RRSP losses by “withdrawing them in kind” to non-registered status. That is, you keep the position but in effect move it outside the RRSP.

An alternative to early RRSP drawdowns

This is an alternative to the more typical RRSP drawdown tactic of first selling your stocks inside the RRSP, then withdrawing the cash. Either way you are “deregistering” some of your RRSP, which means paying withholding taxes. You’ll pay 10% for withdrawals under $5,000, 20% for those between $5,001 and $15,000 and 30% beyond that. This can be handled automatically by your RRSP trustee.

Liberating your losers can make sense under three circumstances, my source says: when you have had bad timing in your RRSP/RRIF investment choices; when you’re confident your investment will return to its previous higher value; and if you prefer to pay tax on 50% of a capital gain rather than 100% of income.

Making Lemonade from Lemons

Mind you, I also talked to three sources who were willing to be on the record, and some were skeptical that the strategy was worth implementing. Continue Reading…

Will investing in your child’s business endanger your retirement?

Posted By |

By Dave Faulkner, CLU, CFP

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Your son or daughter just asked you for a short-term loan to help them start a business. If everything goes well, they will pay you back with interest in a few years. But what if they never pay you back? How much will it impact your ability to enjoy your retirement?

RediNest is a personal financial planning application that you can use to get answers to your retirement planning questions.

How RediNest can help

John and Joan plan to retire in 10 years. Although they do not have a pension plan, they have $300,000 in RRSP and $100,000 in TFSA investments. With no mortgage, they are able to contribute the maximum each year to both RRSP and TFSA.

Using RediNest they calculated their Retirement Potential™ at $73,900 of after-tax retirement income, slightly more than the Canadian average* of $69,000.

Their son has asked them to invest $100,000 in his business. He has prepared a business plan, and expects to repay the full amount over five years. John and Joan want to fully understand the risks before loaning their son the money, so they modified their RediNest plan and reduced their TFSA balance to zero.

Assuming a worst case scenario where they never get their money back, John and Joan re-calculated their Retirement Potential to be $67,800, a reduction of over $6,000 / year for life! A significant amount when you consider it is after-tax and fully indexed for inflation. If they never get their money back, John and Joan want to understand the options available to them to restore their Retirement Potential, as they do not want to have less disposable income in retirement.

Using RediNest, John and Joan discovered they would have to increase their monthly savings by over $900/month for the next 10 years: something they feel they cannot do.

Deferring retirement by a year

Continue Reading…

6 types of loans for people with poor Credit

Posted By |

By Emily Roberts

(Sponsored Content)

Even if you’re used to getting rejected because of your bad credit, there’s no need to panic. There are plenty of lenders offering solutions for people such as yourself. You just need to make sure you know all of your options and understand what each offers. The following are the main types of bad credit loans you should be considering when a traditional loan is simply not an option.

1.) Guarantor Loans

Guarantor loans are unsecured loans that can help you borrow as little as £100 [£1 = US$1.33] and as much as £15,000 even with a poor credit history. They are among the most popular types of loans because they’re cheaper and more flexible than other forms of borrowing with a bad credit.

As a matter of fact, the credit history and score of the guarantor will be more important, making them one of the best for people with poor credit or with blemishes on their report. They’re also ideal for people with no credit history. Furthermore, guarantor loans can also help borrowers improve their credit rating after successfully repaying them.

2.) Personal Loans

The great thing about personal loans is that you can borrow large sums over one to five years, all this without providing any collateral or security. Less than perfect credit scores are accepted by many lenders and you don’t need a guarantor either. Opal Loans, for example, offers unsecured loans to people with bad credit provided they have a salary of at least £800 per month.

3.) Secured Loans

Secured loans allow borrowers to borrow even larger sums than regular unsecured loans, and the sum can be repaid up to 25 years in some cases. Poor credit plans are available, which makes them a viable option for those with a not-so-perfect credit score. However, you do need to own a home and have a mortgage in order to be eligible for secured loans because they are secured on the value of the property.

4. Logbook Loans

Continue Reading…

How mortgage rule changes impact affordability

Posted By |

By Alyssa Furtado

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

The mortgage market in Canada is heavily regulated. Both the federal government and the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) control almost every aspect of residential mortgage lending.

The government decides what criteria people must meet when getting a mortgage in Canada. Rules apply to almost every aspect of the mortgage, ranging from the maximum amortization to the minimum down payment required when buying a home.

In the last few years, the government has taken action in response to rapidly rising house prices in an effort to keep people from taking on mortgages they can’t afford. A number of changes have been made to mortgage rules since 2012. Dry descriptions of the changes make it difficult to understand their true effect.

Instead, let’s take a look at some examples of how some recent mortgage rule changes affect their ability to borrow.

Sarah and Rachel

Even though Sarah and Rachel are choosing a three-year fixed mortgage with a rate of 2.39% for their condo purchase, new “stress testing” rules introduced in October 2016 mean they have to qualify at a substantially higher mortgage rate than they’ll actually get. The qualifying rate is set by the Bank of Canada (BoC), and is currently 4.84%. When checking a mortgage payment calculator, they find that even though their monthly payment will be $2,352 at their chosen rate, they’ll need to prove they can afford payments of $3,043.

A new rule pertaining to minimum down payments that came into effect in February 2016 will apply to Sarah and Rachel as well. The minimum down payment on a home sold for over $500,000 was raised to 5% of the first $500,000, and 10% of any amount thereafter. For their $540,000 purchase, Sarah and Rachel have to save a little longer: the minimum down payment went up to $29,000 from $27,000. They’ll also need to pay for CMHC insurance since their down payment is less than 20%. Continue Reading…