Inflation

Inflation

Budget 2022: as feared, an NDP-influenced Spendathon

Posted By |
CTV News

Ottawa has just released its federal Budget 2022, which seems to validate the pre-release fears that a de facto Liberal NDP coalition would be a high-spending, high-taxing affair. You can find the full budget documents at the Department of Finance web site here. It is as expected “a typical NDP tax-and-spend budget,” as interim Conservative Leader Candice Bergen told the CBC.

Budget 2022 is unmemorably titled A Plan to Grow Our Economy and Make Life More Affordable, weighing in relatively slim by federal budget standards: just shy of 300 pages.  Of course, the NDP is all over this document, which is why I call the de facto coalition the LibDP.

Naturally, the NDP’s pet priority is included, with $5.3 billion over 5 years for national dental care. As CTV reported, the program will offer dental care to families with annual incomes below $90,000, with no co-pays for those under $70,000 annually in income. The first phase in 2022 will offer dental care to children under 12.

Big focus on affordable housing

Of the $56 billion in projected new spending over six years, $10 billion is going to housing over five years, with a one-time $500 payment to those struggling with housing affordability. And as expected,  foreign buyers will be shut out of the market for condos, apartments, and single residential units for the next two years.

They are also cracking down on home flippers, introducing new rules as of January 2023, such that if anyone sells a property held for less than 12 months it would be considered to a flip and be subject to full tax on their profits as business income (with some exceptions in certain special cases).

National Defence will get $8 billion over 5 years, There’s $500 million for military aid to Ukraine and $1 billion in loans.

Perhaps we should use CTV News’ phrase and describe the spending as “targeted”:

The budget proposes $9.5 billion in new spending for the 2022-23 fiscal year — with the biggest ticket items focused on housing supply, Indigenous reconciliation, addressing climate change, and national defence — while also set to take in more than $2 billion in revenue-generating efforts.

New “Minimum Tax Regime”

CTV reports that Budget 2022 “puts high earners on notice that the government thinks some high-income Canadians aren’t paying enough in personal income tax.”  The Liberals say they will be examining “a new minimum tax regime, which will go further towards ensuring that all wealthy Canadians pay their fair share.”

Here is the Globe & Mail’s initial overview (paywall.) Or click this headline:

Federal budget unveils plans for $56-billion in new spending, higher taxes, but short on growth plans

According to the Globe,  the planned bank tax is different from the initial proposal from the Liberal’s 2021 election platform: rather than a three percentage point surtax on earnings over $1-billion, the budget announces a 1.5 percentage point increase on taxable income over $100 million. That brings the tax rate on those earnings from 15% to 16.5%.

In addition to $4-billion for cities to build 100,000 new homes, Ottawa will provide tax-free home savings accounts of up to $40,000. Future first time homebuyers will get an RRSP-style tax rebate when they contribute and the money can grow tax free. First-time homebuyers will also get a tax credit of $1,500 and a home renovation tax credit of up to $7,500 to help families add second suites for family members. Continue Reading…

Investing during Wartime: How does the Geopolitical Climate impact your Financial Planning?

Posted By |

By Steve Lowrie, CFA

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Don’t let Geopolitical Strife destroy your Investment Resolve.

This month, I was planning to write about financial planning for small- to mid-size business owners, including ways to optimize your personal and corporate tax planning. I believe many of you will find the information useful, so I promise to publish that soon.

But not now. Not after Putin invaded Ukraine. It feels wrong to go about business as usual while most of us are asking important questions about this geopolitical crisis.

By no means do our financial concerns detract from the greater, human toll. That said, if I can help you remain resolute as the world justifiably severs Russia’s access to capital markets and the global economy, perhaps we can both do our part to restore justice in Ukraine.

So, let’s talk about geopolitics and investing during wartime. Here are my key takeaways:

Big picture, geopolitical events’ impact on financial markets are usually short-lived

To help you keep your financial wits about you, consider Vanguard’s historical perspective on how the U.S. stock market has responded to other geopolitical crises over the past six decades. As Vanguard’s chart depicts in the article Ukraine and the Changing market environment, the turmoil has typically translated into initial sell-offs. But markets have also exhibited remarkable resilience, delivering returns in line with long-term averages as soon as six months later. That’s not to predict the same outcome this time, but it reinforces the wisdom of betting for vs. against the market’s staying powers.

Credit: Vanguard – Ukraine and the changing market environment

In Vanguard Canada’s recent article, When the markets seem to turn against you, Greg Davis, Chief Investment Officer recommends a steadfast approach:

“A new dimension of risk has entered the financial markets with heightened tensions in Ukraine …

We know this, however, about equity markets in the context of geopolitical risks: they’ve been resilient, much as markets have always been resilient in the face of various risks. We expect the markets to work themselves out, reaching new heights over time and at varying paces …

So now is not the time to give up your fortitude. Now is the time to take it all in with a deep breath, knowing that this day would come — and knowing that it will pass.”

Speaking of predictions, ignore those who claim to know what’s going to happen next

In their landmark studies on political forecasts documented in their book, Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction, Wharton professor Philip Tetlock (a Canadian, by the way) and co-author Dan Gardner found that we’re unlikely to do our net worth any favors by depending on the “expert” predictions you may be seeing on the daily news:

“People who generate better sound bites generate better media ratings, and that is what gets people promoted in the media business. So, there is a bit of a perverse inverse relationship between having the skills that go into being a good forecaster and having the skills that go into being an effective media presence.”

In other words, those forecasts you’re hearing are more likely to sound like sure (often scary) bets, and less likely to be reasoned reflections on the many ways any given event might play out. In fact, evidence suggests, the more certain an expert seems about their forecast, the more skeptical you should be about its worth.

Continue Reading…

How Real-Return Bonds compare to Regular Bonds

Posted By |
 
ultimate guide to bonds

Real-return bonds pay a return adjusted for inflation. But when you buy a real-return bond, you are only protecting yourself against unanticipated rises in inflation.

Real-return bonds pay you a rate of return that’s adjusted for inflation, but that’s not always as promising as it seems.

When a real-return bond is issued, the level of the consumer price index (CPI) on that date is applied to the bond. After that, both the principal and interest payments are typically adjusted every six months, upwards or downwards from that base level, to compensate for a rise or fall in the CPI.

Look at this theoretical example to understand how a real-return bond works

The Bank of Canada issues $400 million of 30-year bonds maturing on December 1, 2049. The bonds have a coupon, or interest rate, of 2%.

If after six months from the date of issue, the new CPI level is, say, 1% above the level of the CPI on the issue date, then each $1,000 of bond principal is adjusted to $1,010 of bond principal ($1,000 x 1.01). The semi-annual interest payment is then $10.10 ($1,010 x 2% / 2).

If after 12 months, the level is 2% higher, then the bond principal is adjusted to $1,020 ($1,000 x 1.02), and the interest payment rises to $10.20 ($1,020 x 2% / 2).

Consider these three important factors to realize benefits with real-return bonds

  1. The price you pay for real-return bonds reflects the anticipated rate of inflation. In other words, if investors feel that inflation will rise 2% over the long term, the price of the bond will reflect that future inflation increase and its effect on the bond’s principal and interest payments. So, when you buy a real-return bond, you are only protecting yourself against unanticipated rises in inflation.
  2. When the inflation rate falls over a six-month period, the principal and interest payments of a real-return bond fall. In times of deflation, the inflation rate turns negative. In a prolonged period of deflation, the principal of a real-return bond could fall below the purchase price. Interest payments would fall, as well.
  3. As with regular bonds, holders of real-return bonds must pay tax on interest payments at the same rate as ordinary income. That income gets taxed at the investor’s marginal rate. In addition, holders of real-return bonds must also report the amount by which the inflation-adjusted principal rises each year, as interest income, even though you won’t receive that amount until the bond matures. That amount is added to the bond’s adjusted cost base.

If the CPI level falls, that reduces the inflation-adjusted principal. You deduct the amount of that reduction from your taxable interest income that year, and also subtract it from the adjusted cost base.

Download this free report to learn more about how to profit from stock investing.

Find out how real-return bonds compare to regular bonds and if they make better additions to your portfolio

In simple terms, a bond is a form of lending whereby you lend money to a corporation or government. In return, a bond pays a fixed rate of interest during its life. Eventually, a bond matures, and holders get the bond’s face value—but nothing more. Receiving the fixed interest and face value at maturity is the best that can happen. Note, though, that in some cases, corporate bonds can go into default. As well, inflation can devastate the purchasing power of bonds and other fixed-return investments.

Furthermore, bonds also generate more commission fees and income for your broker, compared to stocks, especially if you buy them via bond funds and other investment products. Continue Reading…

Dealers putting Clients’ Retirements in Jeopardy

Posted By |

By Nick Barisheff

Special to the Findependence Hub

Over time, most investment dealers have implemented misguided policies that will negatively affect their clients’ investment portfolios and their ability to achieve a secure retirement.

There are two main policies that have negative impacts on investors’ portfolios. One is restricting investments to a client’s original Risk Tolerance in the Know Your Client application form (KYC). When opening an account, the client will advise the dealer of their Risk Tolerance.  Most clients will indicate that they are medium risk. On March 8, 2017, the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) implemented risk rating rules that require all mutual funds to rate their fund according to 10-year standard deviation. In 2018, I published an article entitled New Mandatory Risk Rating is Misleading Canadian investors.

Prior to the OSC’s implementation of the risk rating rules, on December 13, 2013, the OSC issued CSA Notice 81-324 and Request to Comment – Proposed CSA Mutual Fund Risk Classification Methodology for Use in Fund Facts. My comments on this policy were submitted to the OSC on March 12, 2014, along with comments from 50 other industry experts.  

I presented a paper to the OSC that argued that Standard Deviation is not an appropriate measure of risk, since the best-performing mutual fund and the worst-performing mutual fund in Canada had the same Standard Deviation.  The measure of Standard Deviation of an investment does not reduce the risk of incurring losses.

A better, more accurate methodology would have used downside standard deviation or the Sharpe or Sortino ratios which measure risk adjusted returns. Nevertheless, the OSC implemented risk rating rules requiring all mutual funds to rate the risk of their funds according to 10 year standard deviation.

As a result, if investments in a client’s portfolio exceeded the risk tolerance as indicated in the original KYC, the client was forced to redeem those investments, by the advisor’s compliance department. A number of BMG’s clients were forced to redeem their positions since our funds had a medium-high risk rating according to the OSC formula, and the clients’ KYC indicated medium-risk tolerance. A number of clients wanted to change the KYC in order to allow them to maintain ownership of our funds but were advised that, unless there was a significant change in their financial circumstances, they could not change their KYC. Continue Reading…

Spooked by the stock market? Here’s the answer

Posted By |

By Dale Roberts, cutthecrapinvesting

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Most investors do not like volatility. They do not like looking at their investment account balance observing that they’ve ‘lost money.’

Of course, you have not lost money until you buy an asset at a certain price and then sell at a lower price. You’ve then just realized your losses. You have not lost money when your portfolio value goes down. And in fact, swings in portfolio values are just par for the course. Stocks and bonds and real estate change in price (with wild swings at times) in regular fashion: it’s normal behaviour. If the stock markets have you spooked, there is a simple and timeless plan of action.

With this strategy, you can ‘win’ if stocks go up. You can win if stocks go down. It’s a strategy that worked during the worst period in stock market history: the Great Depression of the 1930s .

The answer of course is adding money on a regular schedule. In the investment world they call it dollar cost averaging; we can abbreviate that to DCA. There is no need to guess about which way the market is going to go today, next week, next month, next year, or even the next five years. We simply expect or hope that the markets will go up over longer periods, as they have throughout history.

Stock market history

U.S. stocks, S&P 500

You can see that there is lots of green on the board. Stocks mostly go up. It is those pink years (on the table) that usually trip up many investors

The key to long-term wealth building is being able to invest through those down years. And in fact, adding money in those years is quite beneficial as the stocks go on sale.

But keep in mind that stocks can stay under water for extended periods.

Dollar cost averaging

Now this is a consideration for those who have very little exposure to stocks, or who have been out of the markets for quite some time. That event is not as rare as you might think. Many investors have left the markets, though they recognize that they need to be invested to reach their financial goals and enjoy a prosperous retirement. They also want their wealth protected from inflation.

Here’s the demonstration: investing through the initial stages of the Great Depression.

In the above charts we see equal amounts invested, but the dollar cost averaging strategy still delivered positive returns in a vicious bear market. Buying at those lower prices was very beneficial. Now keep in mind for the above to work, the markets have to go up over time. They have to recover. And historically they have.

Time reduces risk

Here is a wonderful graphic that demonstrates the returns over various periods. Our odds increase as we lengthen the time period that we remain invested.

And a table that frames the probabilities of positive returns.

Charlie Bilello

Spread out that lump sum

If you are sitting on a large sum that you want to get invested you will have to have a plan. Over what time period should you get those monies into the market?

If you start investing and the markets keep going up, great. Mission accomplished. The money you’ve invested has increased in value. You are collecting dividends along the way.

But of course when we enter a stock market correction, your total portfolio value will decline. Though you might get enough of a head start so that your money invested remains in positive territory.

At that point when markets are declining, remember that lower prices are good. The stocks are going on sale. And of course, you do not have to invest in an all-equity portfolio. You can dollar cost average into a balanced portfolio.

I’d suggest that you spread the money out over 2 or 3 years. For example, If you are on the 2-year plan and have $100,000 to invest and you’re investing every month, you’d invest $4,167 per month.

You can’t time the markets

For those who already have substantial assets invested, you can’t move in and out of the markets. We don’t know when the corrections will occur. The most reasonable course of actions is still dollar cost averaging. That said, whenever you have money to invest, stock market history says get it invested. The sooner the better.

From My Own Advisor here ‘s – Dollar cost averaging vs lump sum investing.

Invest within your risk tolerance level

This is key. If you get scared and sell, you might lose money.

You might have to accept a lower-risk portfolio that is likely to earn less over time compared to a more aggressive stock-heavy portfolio or balanced portfolio. It’s also possible that you do not have the risk tolerance to invest (at all), even in a very conservative ETF portfolio. If that is the case you would have to stick with GICs and high-interest savings accounts. You might add to your real estate exposure for growth. In retirement, you might use annuities to boost your income.

For savings we use EQ Bank. 3-and 6-month GIC’s now 2.05%

To help gauge your risk tolerance level and the appropriate level of portfolio risk, please have a read of the core couch potato portfolios on MoneySense. You’ll find a table within that post that breaks it down.

If you are risk averse, you likely need a managed portfolio and advice. You might consider a Canadian Robo Advisor. These investment companies provide lower-fee portfolios at various risk levels. Advice is also included. A few of these firms also offer financial planning.

At Justwealth, you get access to advice and financial planning. In fact, you’ll have your own dedicated advisor.

Justwealth. The Canadian Robo Advisor that knows when to get personal.

They will do a risk evaluation to see if investing is right for you, and then you will be placed in the appropriate portfolio(s). And once again, you’ll be offered the greater financial plan as well.

Start investing

Preet [Banerjee] puts some of the above in video form [YouTube.com]. Preet also goes over how much you might market over various time frames, at different rates of return.

The key is to not be frozen on the sidelines. We might refer to that as ‘paralysis by analysis’.

Build wealth at your own comfort level, at your own pace. You will learn as you go. You can build up your comfort level for risk and volatility. It’s quite possible that you can increase your risk tolerance level over time. We develop risk callouses.

Walk before you run, perhaps.

Robo Advisors are a great training ground for investors.

Thanks for reading. We’ll see you in the comment section. If you’re not sure what to do, feel free to flip me a note.

Dale Roberts is the Chief Disruptor at cutthecrapinvesting.com. A former ad guy and investment advisor, Dale now helps Canadians say goodbye to paying some of the highest investment fees in the world. This blog originally appeared on Dale’s site on Feb. 12, 2022 and is republished on the Hub with his permission.