Longevity & Aging

No doubt about it: at some point we’re neither semi-retired, findependent or fully retired. We’re out there in a retirement community or retirement home, and maybe for a few years near the end of this incarnation, some time to reflect on it all in a nursing home. Our Longevity & Aging category features our own unique blog posts, as well as blog feeds from Mark Venning’s ChangeRangers.com and other experts.

Summer Reads 2025: Booking Up on Ageing & Longevity

Posted By Financial Independence Hub | August 20, 2025

By Mark Venning, ChangeRangers.com

Special to Financial Independence Hub

For this my 8^th year of suggested titles for “booking up” in the subject area of ageing and longevity there’s only one book in a stack of others on unrelated subjects.

As I observed last year, with countless new books in this subject area arriving each year, sometimes I find a scarcity of new books that help to move the societal conversation, for I tend to lean towards those which focus that way, and those that offer an age inclusive global perspective where possible.

First up then, published in Australia, is The Age-friendly Lens (2023) a ‎ Routledge collection of essays/case studies edited by Christie M. Gardiner &Eileen O’Brien Webb, compiled in 2 parts; Age-friendly Systems and Age-friendly Housing & Accommodation. The chapters feature insights from around the world: Canada, Netherlands, Poland and Australia for example. In part as the introduction says, this book is “recommended reading for policy makers, politicians, think tanks and lobbyists who are all-age-inclusiveness.”

For a taste, Chapter 13 is available in Open Access on Taylor Francis Publishing: International standardisation of products and services for ageing societies: Promoting the global application of an age- friendly lens. I promote this as it is written by a team of members on the ISO TC314 Ageing Societies Standards Committee, of which I am a relatively new contributing member represented in Canada on the Standards Council of Canada.

As somewhat of a connection off centre from this age-friendly lens, as it relates to age-friendly cities, I mention this next book on my summer reading list, new this summer: Messy Cities: Why We Can’t Plan Everything (2025) a collection of over 40 short essays edited by Dylan Reid, Zahra Ebrahim, Leslie Woo & John Lorinc – asking myself to wonder, how does messy work when we consider the design of an age-friendly or age inclusive city?

Urbanist admired Toronto

In Dylan Reid’s “sneak peek” of this book about messy urbanism, on his Desire Lines Substack, the story is told about how urbanist James Rojas came to Toronto in 2007 and admired it for the “sort of less than manicured quality to the whole thing … and coupled with a huge diversity of people, the city ends up feeling gloriously messy, in a functional and walkable way.”

Well Toronto, my original home city, is still messy, a 2025 version one can observe. And not to be disturbed, while I wait for this book to arrive this week, I have directed myself to inspect Reid’s 2010 essay Bless This Mess, which will tone me up in the meantime. Continue Reading…

Rob Carrick’s G&M retirement: what he and other retiring PF writers have learned about Retirement

Posted By Jonathan Chevreau | August 13, 2025

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column has just been published and features input from Rob Carrick, who just retired from the Globe & Mail after almost three decades covering Personal Finance (PF henceforth). You can find the full column by clicking on the hyperlinked headline here: How financial journalists plan their own retirement.

While some may view this as an exercise in Inside Baseball, the column also features interviews with someone Rob and I agree was the “granddaddy” of Canadian PF writing: Bruce Cohen of the Financial Post. Bruce in effect handed off the PF beat to me a few years after I joined the paper in 1993. For the column, Bruce provided several retirement tips but clarified there were at least two such PF writers even before him (Mike Grenby and Henry Zimmer.). Guess you could call them the grandaddies of Canadian personal finance writing!

Unlike other journalists mentioned in the column, Bruce is one of the few who actually did truly retire: after a 5-year transition he says he fully retired at the traditional retirement age of 65. Now 75, he lives on 50 acres north of Toronto. He cites actuary Malcolm Hamilton’s conclusion that spending/lifestyle in retirement is pretty much the same as pre-retirement: “Ergo, most people did not need a 70% income replacement ratio. That’s been true for me, though I don’t know if it still applies to the general population as many older people seem to carry significant debt into retirement and many adult children are living with their parents.”

The MoneySense column also includes input from Garry Marr, another ex Postie who just weeks ago announced he is returning to the Financial Post to write about — you guessed it — Personal Finance.

Retiring from Full-time Retirement Blogging

Meanwhile, south of the border, we got some input from Fritz Gilbert, who announced this spring in his The Retirement Manifesto blog that he is “retiring” from full-time blogging about Retirement.

Pretty ironic, isn’t it?

Since Rob Carrick is still only 62 years old, he clarifies that while he is no longer a salaried employee at a newspaper (he formally left on June 30th), he definitely plans to keep his hand in PF writing, including two monthly columns at the G&M: one on traditional PF, the second on his new Retirement experience.

He agrees that Retirement is a bit of an outdated word and that what he is doing is closer to Semi-Retirement, or indeed the term I coined in my financial novel, Findependence Day. Continue Reading…

Investing for Income vs. Total Return: Why choose?

Posted By Financial Independence Hub | August 4, 2025

By Mark Seed, myownadvisor

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Welcome to a new Weekend Reading edition, on an important but seemingly never-ending debate: should you be investing for income or total return?

Maybe in the end, why choose one over the other at all???

First up, recent articles on my site.

I contributed to this recent MoneySense Best ETFs in Canada edition – that includes one global ETF I own for total return since 2020:

And, I shared our planned financial independendence budget. I would be happy to compare notes with you on what you intend to spend and when in your retirement.

Investing for Income vs. Total Return, why choose?

Leading off this Weekend Reading edition, a theme I’ve written about from time to time here: income investing vs. total return.

Both approaches have merit: which was the subject of my enjoyable debate with passionate DIY income investor Henry Mah a few weeks ago. You can watch it here!

Personally, while I’ve always had a passion for owning some dividend-paying stocks in my portfolio and likely always will, I can’t ignore the benefits of total return.

At the core:

Investors often focus on total return and likely should during their asset accumulation years in particular since total return encompasses both income generation, such as dividends, and capital appreciation (changes in the market value of your investments). We should all know by now that growth/price increases remain an essential component of wealth-building: prices moving higher and higher than what you paid for them is good.

Income investing focuses on generating regular cash flow from your investments, rather than solely relying on capital appreciation or downplaying it based on your stock selections. Income funds, income-oriented Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) or in Henry’s particular case, owning a small basket of concentrated stocks from the TSX that pay dividends has provided income-focused investors like Henry arguably lower-risk for him while growing his income higher over time via higher dividend payments.

$Honest Math - Dividends$

In the TD debate here, I argued striking the right balance between income needs and growth in the total return equation is probably best for most: it has historically delivered long-term success and there is no reason to believe why a basket of global stocks won’t continue to do so.

So, I get the income investor debate, I really do, and maybe moreso given I consider myself in semi-retirement now; my part-time work started a few months ago.

Investing for income via dividend stocks often includes these benefits for retirees:

Tangible income: shares of companies that distribute a portion of their profits to shareholders, are often mature and established businesses that have ample cashflow to sustain their payment obligations. This tangible income (and arguably stable income) can help cover living expenses.
Rising income: such established companies can also raise their dividends year-over-year, rewarding shareholders with rising income that can help offset inflationary pressures. Sustained 3-4% or more dividend increases by some companies can be inflation-fighters.
Tax benefits: depending on what stocks you own where (i.e., in what accounts), dividend payments can offer favourable tax benefits. Read about the tax treatment of Canadian dividends below.

Academic history lessons along with any Google search on this subject will show various charts and graphs that demonstrate the critical role that dividends – and, in particular, reinvested dividends – play in delivering an attractive total return to investors over time. But this just makes sense, in that reinvested dividends are like not getting any dividend payment paid to you in the first place …

Another important contributor to equity market returns has been dividend growth. Equities are growth assets – which I argued in the TD debate – so companies who tend to grow their revenues, profits and earnings over time, is the reason why they can continue to reward their shareholders with higher dividend payments. Growth is needed, for total return, for your/our juicy dividend payments to continue. Continue Reading…

Financial Independence: While you’re still young enough to Enjoy it

Posted By Financial Independence Hub | July 24, 2025

By Jordan McCaleb

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Financial Independence (aka Findependence) is a dream many hope to achieve, the freedom to live the life you’ve always dreamed of, pursuing passions or simply choosing to work on your own terms. While these are all great reasons, what about achieving this earlier?

This article will explore key investment strategies and asset allocations to accelerate your path to early financial freedom, including the role of precious metals investments.

Traditional Investments & their Limits

It’s important to acknowledge that traditional investments (stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and ETFs) will always be the building blocks when it comes to financial independence.

However, when it comes to achieving Findependence earlier in life, traditional investments may have potential limitations and risks involved.

Potential Limitations and Risks:

Inflation: Inflation erodes the real value of your accumulated savings over time.

Market Volatility: Unpredictable swings and downturns can threaten your gains and potentially delay your FI (financial independence) timeline.

Economic Uncertainty: Geopolitical risks and unforeseen crises can increase risk and cause market corrections, impacting even the safest portfolio.

While traditional investments form a crucial base for any Findependence strategy, they may not be enough to achieve the resilience and growth required. Achieving financial independence early requires specific and powerful assets to drive your portfolio, providing a balance to your financial ecosystem.

Accelerating your FI Timeline: Beyond just Investing

Accelerating your Findependence timeline requires additional steps. A crucial part is increasing your savings rate, aiming for 50% to 75% of your income, creating a powerful snowball effect that reduces your time horizon. This pairs with increasing your income through career advancement, salary raises, or profitable side hustles.

Simultaneously, optimizing expenses and embracing a frugal lifestyle in areas like housing, transportation, and food can further boost investment growth over time. A key step is defining your (FI Number) typically 25 times your desired annual expenses ($50,000). This lifestyle-specific figure provides a clear target.

Diversifying for Resilience: Beyond the Basics

Beyond traditional investments and accelerating your timeline, diversification involves not just different stocks, but asset classes as well (equities, fixed income, real estate, and alternatives). Each behaves differently under various economic challenges. Diversifying across geographies and industries can protect against downturns in a market or sector.

A crucial concept to know is asset correlation: You want your assets to not run in the same direction. According to Stock Rover, this reduction in volatility can significantly impact overall returns. For example, a portfolio experiencing wild swings of +20% then -20% loses money, while reducing it to +10% then -10% swings leads to a healthier outcome. In essence, a low correlation portfolio better withstands economic turbulence.

Strategic Allocation: The Role of Precious Metals

When aiming for early Findependence, strategic alternative assets are crucial. Gold and silver stand out as a hedge against inflation and economic uncertainty due to their low correlation nature. Historical data from Investopedia reveals that while the S&P 500 dropped almost 10% (2007-2010) during the 2008 financial crisis, a 1971 gold investment significantly increased in value. Gold IRAs also offer tax advantages for those interested in physical metals. Continue Reading…

Rethinking Retirement Income

Posted By Financial Independence Hub | July 7, 2025

How real Spending Patterns challenge Traditional Retirement Income Planning

By Steve Lowrie, CFA

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Here’s a contrarian thought.

When most people imagine retirement, they picture steady cash flow from their investments to support their lifestyle.

The common assumption is that they’ll preserve their financial nest egg and live off the growth” drawing a consistent amount each year while keeping the principal largely intact.

But there are actually three broad approaches. At one end, some plan to spend their entire portfolio over their expected lifetime (as one client joked, “I want my last cheque to bounce.” At the other end is the idea of preserving capital entirely. Most people, in practice, end up somewhere in between.

But what if that assumption is only part of the story?

The reality is that real-life retirement spending isn’t flat. It fluctuates unevenly and unexpectedly over time. And those patterns can have a big impact on your retirement income strategy.

Retirement Planning has changed. Have you?

For decades, retirement planning has focused on Saving: building a nest egg, maximizing RRSPs, and making the most of tax-advantaged accounts.

But the real challenge begins after you stop working. Then, the question becomes:

How do I turn my savings into reliable, lasting income?

This is where traditional models often fall short. Most assume spending stays constant throughout retirement. But as recent research from J.P. Morgan Asset Management shows, that’s not how real retirees actually spend.

For more on how conventional rules can mislead, see Debunking Retirement Financial “Rules.”

What the Data shows

J.P. Morgan studied anonymized spending data from more than 5 million U.S. households, offering a detailed picture of how retirees actually spend in retirement. These findings closely align with what I’ve observed over 30 years of working with Canadian clients.

Three key Retirement Spending patterns:

Spending Surge: Many retirees experience a spike in spending right around the time they retire. This is often due to lifestyle changes and delayed goals coming to fruition in the early retirement years, like travel, home upgrades, or helping adult children.
Spending Curve: Over time, overall spending tends to decline. For example, households with investable assets between $250,000 and $750,000 saw an average inflation-adjusted spending decrease of about 1.65% annually through retirement.
Spending Volatility: Perhaps most important, spending is anything but steady. According to J.P. Morgan’s 2025 Guide to Retirement, 60% of retirees saw their expenses fluctuate by 20% or more in the first three years of retirement. And this volatility often continues well into later years.

These findings show that retirement income strategies need to be flexible enough to accommodate spikes, declines, and everything in between.

Why it matters

Most financial plans assume a flat, inflation-adjusted income for 25 to 30 years. That’s a very good place to start. However, based on both this research and my practical experience observing hundreds of client habits over three decades, here’s what can happen:

You over-save early, delaying retirement unnecessarily
You under-spend during healthy years, missing out on the freedom you’ve earned
You get caught off guard by spending spikes, leading to early withdrawals or tax surprises

J.P. Morgan’s data shows retirees typically need about 92% of pre-retirement income at age 65, but just 70% by age 85. That is a significant shift and a reminder of why you want healthy exposure to equities, which is the only asset class that has historically given the best chance of outpacing inflation over the long run.