Longevity & Aging

No doubt about it: at some point we’re neither semi-retired, findependent or fully retired. We’re out there in a retirement community or retirement home, and maybe for a few years near the end of this incarnation, some time to reflect on it all in a nursing home. Our Longevity & Aging category features our own unique blog posts, as well as blog feeds from Mark Venning’s ChangeRangers.com and other experts.

Death and Taxes, Cross-border Style

Posted By |

Dollar Printing: Global Macro Shifts; Franklin Templeton Investments Licensed from Gettyimages

By David Cieslowski, CPA, CA, CFP, CIMA

(Sponsor Content)

As Benjamin Franklin famously wrote, “… in this world, nothing is certain except death and taxes.”  For US citizens, as well as some Canadians who own US assets, the first may be swiftly followed by the second.

In the United States, an estate tax is applied to the transfer of the taxable estate of every deceased  American citizen, resident or non-resident, including green card holders or others with dual US-Canadian citizenship. Even Canadian citizens who have never stepped foot in the United States, but hold US securities or other US assets, could find their estates subject to a tax on situs assets, which are defined as assets with a tangible or intangible direct US connection or location.

The low-down on US estate tax

Estate tax falls into the category of transfer taxes, as opposed to income tax. It can be substantial; those in the top marginal tax bracket may pay up to 40% on estates with assets of more than US$1 million. Moreover, for US citizens and residents this tax applies to assets held worldwide. Real estate ownership alone can easily exceed those limits.

Fortunately, the reality is somewhat more encouraging. Only around 2% of the US population actually pays estate tax, largely because of exclusions that effectively spare all but the largest estates.

The two most common exclusions are:

  • Annual exclusion of US$15,000 per person
  • Lifetime credit of US$11.7 million for 2021 and indexed annually. Something of a political football, this credit can rise or fall along with changes in government[1]. The current credit limit is set to expire at the end of January, 2025.

These annual exclusions are portable, meaning they can be used by any descendant of the deceased.

The gift that keeps on giving: to the IRS

In the battle of wills between those determined to transfer all of their wealth to succeeding generations and those determined to “tax to the max,” many strategies have been tried and failed. Gifting assets to relatives while the owner is still alive has been one of the more popular tactics. Not surprisingly, the IRS employs two additional taxes to thwart such attempts at tax-free wealth transfer.

The first is a garden-variety gift tax. For non-spouses, annual exclusions are the same as for estate taxes. For spouses they are more generous: unlimited for spouses who are US citizens and $159,000 for 2021 (indexed annually) for spouses who are not. Continue Reading…

How much Savings do you need to delay starting CPP and OAS?

Posted By |

By Michael J. Wiener

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

 

Canadians who take their CPP at age 60 instead of 70 “can expect to lose over $100,000 of secure lifetime income, in today’s dollars, over the course of their retirement,” according to Dr. Bonnie-Jeanne MacDonald in research released by the National Institute on Ageing (NIA) and the FP Canada Research Foundation.

However, those who retire before 70 need savings to tide them over until their larger CPP pensions start if they want to live at least as well in their 60s as they do later in retirement.  Here we look at the amount of savings required by a retired 60-year old to be able to delay CPP and OAS pensions.

Incentive for delaying is strong

We’re used to thinking of CPP and OAS pensions as just a few hundred dollars per month, but a 70-year old couple just starting to receive maximum CPP and OAS pensions (but not any of the new expanded CPP) would get $61,100 per year, rising with inflation for the rest of their lives.  If the same couple were 65 they’d only get $43,700 per year.  If this 65-year old couple had taken CPP at 60, their combined CPP and OAS would be $32,700 per year now.  The incentive for delaying the start of CPP and OAS is strong.

We can think of the savings needed to delay the start of CPP and OAS pensions as the price of buying larger inflation-indexed government pensions.  This price is an absolute bargain compared to the cost of buying an annuity from an insurance company.  Those in good health but worried about “losing” if they delay pensions and die young can focus on the positives.  Delaying pensions allows retirees to spend their savings confidently during their 60s knowing that their old age is secure.  Taking small pensions early can leave retirees penny-pinching in their 60s worried about their savings running out in old age.

The table below shows the amount of savings a retired 60-year old requires to delay starting CPP.  This table is based on a number of assumptions:

  1. The current maximum age 65 CPP pension is $1203.75 per month.  Before you take your CPP pension, it grows based on national wage growth as well as an actuarial formula, but after you take it, it grows with “regular” inflation, the Consumer Price Index (CPI).  We assume wage growth will exceed CPI growth by 0.75% per year.
  2. We assume the retiree is entitled to the maximum CPP pension.  Those with smaller CPP entitlements can scale down the savings amounts.  For example, someone expecting only 50% of the maximum CPP pension can cut the savings amounts in half.
  3. We assume the retiree holds savings in an RRSP/RRIF so that withdrawals will be taxed in the same way that CPP pensions are taxed.  Retirees using savings in non-registered accounts won’t need to save as much because they only need to match the after-tax amount of CPP pensions.
  4. The retiree is able to earn enough on savings to keep up with inflation.  (Online banks offer savings account rates that put the big banks to shame.)  The monthly pension amounts in the table are inflation-adjusted; the retiree’s savings will grow to cover the actual CPP pension payments.
  5. We assume the retiree doesn’t have a workplace pension whose bridge benefits end at age 65.  This bridge benefit replaces some of the savings needed to permit delaying CPP and OAS.
CPP % of  Inflation-Adjusted Months of Savings
 Start  Age 65 CPP Monthly CPP Spending from  Needed at
Age Pension Pension  Personal Savings Age 60
60 64.0% $770 0 0
61 71.2% $863 12 $10,400
62 78.4% $958 24 $23,000
63 85.6% $1054 36 $37,900
64 92.8% $1151 48 $55,200
65 100.0% $1250 60 $75,000
66 108.4% $1365 72 $98,300
67 116.8% $1481 84 $124,400
68 125.2% $1600 96 $153,600
69 133.6% $1720 108 $185,800
70 142.0% $1842 120 $221,000

You can’t start OAS till 65 but can delay it till 70

Unlike CPP, you can’t start your OAS pension until you’re at least 65.  But you can delay it until you’re 70 to get larger payments.  The table below shows the amount of savings a retired 60-year old requires to delay starting OAS.  The table is based on a number of assumptions:

  1. The current maximum age 65 OAS pension is $615.37 per month.
  2. We assume the retiree is entitled to the maximum OAS pension by living in Canada for at least 40 out of 47 years from age 18 to 65.
  3. We assume the retiree won’t want to live poor before age 65, which means spending from savings from age 60 to 64 to make up for not receiving OAS.
  4. We assume the retiree holds savings in an RRSP/RRIF so that withdrawals will be taxed in the same way that OAS pensions are taxed.  Retirees using savings in non-registered accounts won’t need to save as much because they only need to match the after-tax amount of OAS pensions. Continue Reading…

Burning questions Retirees face

Posted By |

 

Retirees face a myriad of questions as they head into the next chapter of their lives. At the top of the list is whether they have enough resources to last a lifetime. A related question is how much they can reasonably spend throughout retirement.

But retirement is more than just having a large enough pile of money to live a comfortable lifestyle. Here are some of the biggest questions facing retirees today:

Should I pay off my mortgage?

The continuous climb up the property ladder means more Canadians are carrying mortgages well into retirement. What was once a cardinal sin of retirement is now becoming more common in today’s low interest rate environment.

It’s still a good practice to align your mortgage pay-off date with your retirement date (ideally a few years earlier so you can use the freed-up cash flow to give your retirement savings a final boost). But there’s nothing wrong with carrying a small mortgage into retirement provided you have enough savings, and perhaps some pension income, to meet your other spending needs.

Which accounts to tap first for retirement income?

Old school retirement planning assumed that we’d defer withdrawals from our RRSPs until age 71 or 72 while spending from non-registered funds and government benefits (CPP and OAS).

That strategy is becoming less popular thanks to the Tax Free Savings Account. TFSAs are an incredible tool for retirees that allow them to build a tax-free bucket of wealth that can be used for estate planning, large one-time purchases or gifts, or to supplement retirement income without impacting taxes or means-tested government benefits.

Now we’re seeing more retirement income plans that start spending first from non-registered funds and small RRSP withdrawals while deferring CPP to age 70. Depending on the income needs, the retiree could keep contributing to their TFSA or just leave it intact until OAS and CPP benefits kick-in.

This strategy spends down the RRSP earlier, which can potentially save taxes and minimize OAS clawbacks later in retirement, while also reducing the taxes on estate. It also locks-in an enhanced benefit from deferring CPP: benefits that are indexed to inflation and paid for life. Finally, it can potentially build up a significant TFSA balance to be spent in later years or left in the estate.

Should I switch to an income-oriented investment strategy?

The idea of living off the dividends or distributions from your investments has long been romanticized. The challenge is that most of us will need to dip into our principal to meet our ongoing spending needs.

Consider Vanguard’s Retirement Income ETF (VRIF). It targets a 4% annual distribution, paid monthly, and a 5% total return. That seems like a logical place to park your retirement savings so you never run out of money.

VRIF can be an excellent investment choice inside a non-registered (taxable) account when the retiree is spending the monthly distributions. But put VRIF inside an RRSP or RRIF and you’ll quickly see the dilemma.

RRIFs come with minimum mandatory withdrawal rates that increase over time. You’re withdrawing 5% of the balance at age 70, 5.28% at age 71, 5.40% at age 72, and so on.

That means a retiree will need to sell off some VRIF units to meet the minimum withdrawal requirements.

Replace VRIF with any income-oriented investment strategy in your RRSP/RRIF and you have the same problem. You’ll eventually need to sell shares.

This also doesn’t touch on the idea that a portfolio concentrated in dividend stocks is less diversified and less reliable than a broadly diversified (and risk appropriate) portfolio of passive investments.

By taking a total return approach with your investments you can simply sell off ETF units as needed to generate your desired retirement income.

When to take CPP and OAS?

I’ve written at length about the risks of taking CPP at 60 and the benefits of taking CPP at 70. But it doesn’t mean you’re a fool to take CPP early. CPP is just one piece of the retirement income puzzle. Continue Reading…

Book Shop Remix: Where would you shelve Retirement?

Posted By |

By Mark Venning, ChangeRangers.com

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

 

If you slid into your virtual bookshop to look for a book on the subject of Retirement, where would you begin? A keyword search would likely begin with the phrase “books on retirement” and …

Kaboom! An explosion of titles appear. Depending on your mindset, where your thinking was at a given moment, what triggering event gave rise to a conversation, you would gravitate to where? Titles such as The New Retirementality – Redefining Retirement: New Realities for Boomer Women– How to Retire Happy, Wild, and Free – Purposeful Retirement – What Retirees Want. Only a slice of texts on an almost endless bookshelf, which began to expand after 2004.

In the year 2001, while working as a consultant at a career services firm, (aka Career Transition/Outplacement), a managing partner asked me to deliver a Retirement program. For the first time since the late 1980’s, a corporate client suddenly requested a set of workshops for their employees approaching what they prescribed as retirement age. When I looked through the thick Retirement binder with its referenced reading resources, I ached in the head after what I read.

Sparing the colourful expletives, my response to the managing partner the next day was that I needed to re-design the whole thing before I dared to set foot inside that corporate boardroom. We needed to not only be contemporary, but we also had to be futuristic, to constantly respond to changing attitudes on what I then described as later life journeys as opposed to Retirement. The trouble was it would all seem too cryptic, too ethereal in concept unless I spoke of Retirement.

In prep for the Retirement re-design, I scoured bookshelves to see what new thinking was prevailing at the time and, to my disappointment, there wasn’t much that ground breaking. Much of the material was from the mid to late 1990’s. When you walked into a bookshop, you would find these “Retirement” books in the Business section, likely under the sub shelf “Financial Planning.” The issue with many of these was that specific references became quickly time stamped “out of date.”

Scouting out the extravaganza of Retirement books

While still shelving Retirement books in the Business section, they are usually broken into two categories – Financial Planning and Lifestyle Planning, you may wander into the Careers section – Retire Retirement: Career Strategies for the Boomer Generation for example. With luck, visit Self Help (DIY retirement is a thing). One recommended book I found sits in the Christian Living section. Try fiction! Yes, there are those too; and no doubt, somewhere out there is a Boomer Retirement book club discussing the latest find.

Over my twenty years of scouting out the extravaganza of Retirement books there have been a few peaks in inspired writing and in some cases the writing, aimed at a corporate audience, advised on how organizations should be prepared to “survive the graying of the workforce” and be ready for the “looming wave of Boomer retirements.” Yet there is a trip wire here.

A funny thing happened on the road to Retirement. Where I live, in Ontario Canada, even with the provincial government prohibition of mandatory retirement (with the odd exception) in 2006 there continue to be sinister ways Retirement conversations with employees occur in the workplace. Continue Reading…

Your most valuable asset

Posted By |

By Michael Meyer

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

What is your most valuable asset?

If you are like most Canadians, you may answer your investment portfolio or your home. What if I said it was your time?

If you can imagine your life as a timeline, consider three milestones that are up ahead:

1.) Your healthy life expectancy

2.) Your estimated life expectancy

3.) Your 100th birthday

With diet and exercise, you are able to push out the first two, and give yourself a healthier and longer life.  In the near future, it is possible that with medical advances both one and two may exceed your 100th birthday.  These adjustments are already being considered for pension portfolios.

Now what if I said each of those future years on your timeline are not of equal value?

How should you compare your 40s to your 60s? How do you value those years differently, and how do you weigh your spending in each year for an optimal result?

Next, I want you to think about a stacked timeline, with a separate line for each of your family members.

Certain years are more pivotal than others

You will quickly see that certain years are more pivotal than others. The years your children leave the nest, or the years after the first partner hits retirement.  What about when your parents need help, and your role shifts and becomes that of the caretaker? Predicting health outcomes is a science, and a probability can be assigned to each year of your future. It is helpful for planning purposes to be aware of these milestones, and also to understand how you differ from the average person. Continue Reading…