Tag Archives: asset allocation ETFs

XEQT Review: An iShares All-Equity ETF Analysis

Posted By Financial Independence Hub | November 2, 2021

By Bob Lai, Tawcan

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

A while ago, I wrote a VEQT review where I performed a thorough and deep analysis of the Vanguard All-Equity ETF. While I really like VEQT, we ended up buying XEQT for our kids’ RESPs due to a few key reasons. The beauty of a one-fund solution ETF such as the iShares All-Equity ETF (XEQT) means there’s no need to re-balance regularly. This makes it a very straightforward and simple investment approach. More importantly, the all-in-one ETFs provide instant asset class diversification and geographical diversification, all for a very low management fee.

Vanguard and iShares are two of the most well established and most trusted ETF companies in the world. Both companies offer similar all-equity ETFs – VEQT and XEQT, respectively. Lately, when I’m coaching clients new to investing, I’d typically recommend XEQT to them because of the lower MER fee compared to VEQT.

Although XEQT is great for beginner investors, this all-equity ETF is just as good for experienced investors. This ETF definitely has a place in most investors’ portfolios.

Having written a VEQT review, I figured I needed to write a similar review for XEQT so readers can compare the two side-by-side.

iShares All-Equity ETF – XEQT

The iShares All-Equity ETF Portfolio, XEQT, holds 100% in equity. This means that the ETF holds no bonds. iShares have several all-in-one ETFs and XEQT falls in the more volatile, riskier spectrum of all the all-in-one ETFs because XEQT holds 100% in stocks.

XEQT seeks to provide long-term capital growth by investing primarily in one or more exchange-traded funds managed by BlackRock Canada, or an affiliate that provides exposure to equity securities. Just like its counterpart all-in-one ETFs, iShare All-Equity ETF trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the ticker name “XEQT” and is traded in Canadian dollars.

XEQT is a relatively new ETF. It was created in Aug 2019. Some key facts of XEQT:

Inception Date: Aug 7, 2019
Eligibility: RRSP, RRIF, RESP, TFSA, DPSP, RDSP, taxable
Dividend Schedule: Quarterly
Management Fee: 0.18%
MER: 0.20%
Listing Currency: CAD
Exchange: Toronto Stock Exchange
Net Asset: $595.48M
Number of holdings: 4
The number of stocks: 9,444

XEQT Fees

XEQT has a management expense ratio (MER) of 0.20%, which is 0.05% lower than VEQT. While 0.05% may not seem a lot, if your portfolio value is $250,000, it means $125 in fees each year. While it’s not an enormous amount of money when your portfolio is that big, it adds up eventually.

One thing to note is that the all-in-one and all-equity ETFs that Vanguard, iShares, and other ETF companies all have very low management fees. These management fees are typically much, much lower than the MER on the typical mutual funds available to Canadians. The low MER is one of the key reasons why index ETFs are excellent investment options for Canadians.

If you use a discount broker like Questrade, you can buy ETFs commission free. This would reduce your overall transaction cost significantly. If you use Wealthsimple, you can also buy ETFs commission free.

Check out my Questrade vs. Wealthsimple Trade review to see which discount broker is best for you.

XEQT Underlying Holdings

Like other iShares all-in-one ETFs, XEQT holds four iShares ETFs which means that XEQT holds 9,033 stocks. The underlying holdings are:

iShares Core S&P Total US Stock (ITOT) – 48.02%
iShares MSCI EAFE IMI Index (XEF) – 24.39%
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Composite (XIC) – 22.71%
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets (IMEG) – 4.64%

The rest of the portfolio holds USD and CAD cash and/or derivatives.

XEQT Top 10 Market Allocation

Here is XEQT’s top 10 market allocation.

US: 47.13%
Canada: 23.79%
Japan: 5.37%
UK: 3.08%
Switzerland: 2.25%
France: 2.23%
Germany: 1.92%
Australia: 1.84%
China: 1.74%
Netherlands: 1.27%

How the Asset Allocation in your ETF can help drive Returns

Posted By Financial Independence Hub | September 7, 2021

By Kevin Prins, BMO ETFs

(Sponsor Content)

“Diversification” is a word that gets thrown around a lot these days: and for good reason. A diverse and balanced portfolio can help provide more consistent returns versus individual securities. The asset allocation of your exchange traded funds (ETFs) is of paramount importance to help provide more consistent returns and targeting an appropriate portfolio risk level.

The good news is that ETF providers have provided choice in a range of all-in-one portfolios that are delivered as an ETF on the exchange. Now you can choose from a diverse mix of both domestic and foreign equities and fixed income.

Coupled with your specific investment goals and tolerance for risk, you can rather easily determine which ETF is a good fit for you by considering its strategic asset allocation relative to your needs.

Strategic Asset Allocation vs. Chasing the Asset Class with the highest return

Predicting the top performing asset class year to year is extremely difficult and, when poorly executed, can lead to disappointing results for your portfolio.

But with a diversified Asset Allocation ETF, you can take all the guesswork out of investing.

In other words, your portfolio’s fortunes aren’t tied to a single asset class, making it far more resilient, while simultaneously increasing your chance of having exposure to markets when they have bull runs.

Many investors who try to do it themselves will rely on friends, market research, or maybe even an investment blog to help them pick the securities that will comprise their portfolio.

But this can be time-consuming and risky. Not to mention that these portfolios tend to be under diversified.

You’ll gain exposure to both fixed income and equities with a balanced asset allocation ETF. What’s more, you can avoid one of the common pratfalls of overweighing your portfolio with Canadian securities and instead take a global approach, again helping improve your portfolio’s balance.¹

You’ll also be exposed to both cyclical and defensive sectors, ensuring that your portfolio is designed to perform well in a variety of economic conditions.

The fixed income/equity balance is of importance, as this has the potential to bolster your portfolio with both security and reliable income, while also adding growth potential and inflation protection.

It’s worth stating that a portfolio’s strategic asset allocation will more than likely have a higher impact on its performance than even the individual stock selection, as the graphic above indicates. ²

That’s because opting for a conservative, balanced, and or growth portfolio and investing in asset classes based on your preferences will play the determining role in how to allocate your investment.

Whatever your investment goals, an approach predicated on strategic asset allocation can help you reach them.

8 Reasons to look at Asset Allocation ETFs

Simplified Investing: An all-in-one investment solution that provides instant market exposure
Broad Diversification: Holds a basket of ETFs that in themselves hold many securities
Professionally Constructed: Leverage the asset allocation experience of industry professionals
Automatic Rebalancing: This keeps one’s investment portfolio on track to risk and return objectives Continue Reading…

Getting your Fixed Income Fix with BMO ETFs

Posted By Robb Engen | August 11, 2021

This article has been sponsored by BMO Canada. All opinions are my own.

Fixed income doesn’t get enough attention on this blog, mostly because I’m still in my accumulation years and invest in 100% equities across all my accounts. But most investors should hold bonds in their portfolio to reduce volatility and so they can rebalance (selling bonds to buy more stocks) whenever stocks fall.

In this post we’re going to take a deep dive into BMO’s line-up of fixed income ETFs. We’ll see that there isn’t a one-size-fits-all approach to investing in fixed income, and that investors can capture yield using a wide array of products and strategies.

DIY investors should be familiar with BMO’s suite of fixed income ETFs. It’s the largest in Canada with more than $23 billion in assets. At the top of the list is BMO’s Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG) with total assets of $5.86 billion.

Robo-advised clients also have BMO fixed income ETFs in their model portfolios:

Nest Wealth clients hold BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF – (ZAG)
Wealthsimple clients hold BMO Long Federal Bond Index ETF – (ZFL)
Questwealth clients hold BMO High Yield US Corp Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF – (ZHY)
ModernAdvisor clients hold BMO Emerging Markets Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF – (ZEF)

BMO Fixed Income ETFs

Investors are nervous about holding bonds today. Interest rates are at historic lows, and when rates eventually rise, we’ll see bond prices fall – especially longer duration bonds. We’re also seeing higher inflation, which causes interest rates to go up (and bond values to go down).

I reached out to Erika Toth, Director at BMO ETFs to talk about fixed income ETFs and how investors should think about bonds and fixed income today and into the future.

Q: Erika, investors are concerned about low bond returns, particularly from long-term government bonds. How should they think about the fixed income side of their portfolio?

A: Investors should think of fixed income as a ballast in their portfolio. It helps reduce overall volatility (chart below). Correlations between US Treasuries and stocks (represented by the MSCI USA index) have been negative over the last two decades. All that to say, when stocks fall, bonds tend to do well.

From an investor perspective, there are two things at play – FOMO, and fear of volatility. Fixed income still has its traditional value in a portfolio; to offset equity risk.

What we are seeing from some clients is the willingness to take on more equity risk – shifting from a 60/40 balanced portfolio to 70/30 portfolio, as an example.

But you can see the payoff from fixed income using a simple example of Canadian equities (represented by ZCN) and ZAG. Volatility drops materially without costing investors too much return.

ETF	10-year annualized return	Standard deviation
ZCN	6.21%	11.8%
ZAG	3.69%	4.0%
60/40 (ZCN/ZAG)	5.38%	7.4%
70/30 (ZCN/ZAG)	5.61%	8.5%

The bottom line: Fixed income keeps investors in the markets during times of distress.

Q: What about a retired investor who typically holds a 60/40 or 50/50 portfolio but is concerned about generating income in a low-yield environment?

A: Such an investor may wish to include ETFs that harness option-writing strategies such as covered call writing, put writing, or a combination of the two, to generate a high level of tax efficient monthly cash flow (option premiums are taxed as capital gains and/or return of capital).

With fixed income generating lower yield today, the equity portion of a portfolio needs to make up for the yield shortfall. Covered call strategies are an efficient way to do so and ETFs are a convenient way that allow investors to attain access.

Here are a few examples of these types of strategies. I would include these on the equity side of the portfolio to increase overall level of yield:

ZWC BMO Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF, yields 7.3%
ZWB BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF, yields 5.84%
ZWS BMO US High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF, yields 5.94%

Q: I’m a big fan of asset allocation ETFs to make DIY investing as simple as possible. But is it wise to unbundle ZGRO or ZBAL and hold multiple ETFs with the intention of avoiding long-term bonds in favour of shorter duration government bonds or corporate bonds?

A: Part of the appeal of the all-in-one asset allocation ETFs is their simplicity; and they tend to appeal to investors who do not want to get granular in their investment process. The other benefit of a one-line holding is that you are less likely to overthink the underlying components and make reactive decisions when you see something go into the red.

The 0.18 % management fee (0.20% MER) for ZGRO and ZBAL are all-in, there’s no double-dipping on fees. That is basically the cost of underlying ETFs with almost nothing more for the rebalancing. Keep in mind that there is often a trading cost for rebalancing multiple ETFs on your own. For investors with small portfolios, the cost of selling and buying stocks and bonds every year can become proportionally expensive.

Portfolio rebalancing is the maintenance involved in sticking with your asset allocation plan. Your asset allocation plan is what is going to help you meet your goals. One of the biggest pros to portfolio rebalancing is that it keeps risk under control, and sometimes just maintaining a level of risk takes some action.

There is tremendous value to having the rebalancing done systematically. Conservatively, experts say it can add between 0.30% to 0.40% annually over the long term.

For an investor who does not mind doing a handful of trades and rebalancing once or twice a year, the “unbundling” strategy could work. However, if the concern is rising rates, corporate bonds would tend to do better than government bonds. Continue Reading…

How to generate retirement income

Posted By Financial Independence Hub | April 30, 2021

By Mark Seed, My Own Advisor

Special to the Financial independence Hub

You could argue beyond the how much do I need to retire question, this need comes up next: how to generate retirement income.

Rightly so.

I mean, we all want to know how best to use our retirement incomes sources wisely. Those retirement incomes sources are necessary to help fulfill income needs, while being tax efficient; income to provide some luxuries now and them, or to potentially deliver generational wealth should that be your goal.

My retirement income plan and options

I’ve been thinking about my income plan, or at least my semi-retirement income plan, for some time now.

I captured a list of overlooked retirement income planning considerations here.

Yet I can appreciate not everyone writes about nor thinks about this stuff.

There are obvious ways to generate retirement income but I suspect some might not appeal to you for a few reasons!

Option #1 – Save more

I doubt most people will like this option but it’s probably necessary for many Canadians: you’re going to need to save more than you think to fund your retirement. This is especially true if you have no workplace pension of any kind to rely on and/or you haven’t assessed your spending needs. More money saved will help combat inflationary pressure, rising healthcare costs and longevity risk. Which brings me to option #2.

Option #2 – Work longer

If you didn’t like option #1, you might not like this one! Working longer into your 60s or potentially to your 70s might be the reality for a good percentage of Gen X and Y. Part of the reasons these cohorts will need to work longer is because many Boomers remain in the workforce so they can fund their retirement. Some Boomers are continuing to work because they enjoy it. Some are continuing to work because they absolutely have to.

Option #3 – Spend less

The 4% rule remains a decent rule of thumb – it tells us we should be “safe” to withdraw approximately 4% of our portfolio with a minimal chance of running out of money.

Using 4%, a retiree would need $1-million invested to produce a steady income of $40,000 a year. Spending less, will absolutely help portfolio longevity and give stocks in your portfolio a longer time frame to run.

Our initial retirement income plan has us leveraging a mix of income streams in semi-retirement:

Part-time work – to remain mentally engaged – in our 50s.
Taxable but tax-efficient dividend income.
Strategic RRSP withdrawals.

I’m not quite “there” yet in terms of other incomes streams, including TFSA withdrawals and exactly when to take those, but I’m working through that.

Generating retirement income

When it comes to you, options abound. You might have similar income streams or other ideas altogether. Remember, personal finance is personal.

I’ve had the pleasure of working with a few advice-only planners on this site and I’m happy to bring back Steve Bridge, a CFP from Vancouver for his detailed thoughts on this subject. Steve works as an advice-only financial planner with Money Coaches Canada (no affiliation with My Own Advisor). You can find him on that site for his services and you can follow him often on Twitter like I do at @SteveMoneyCoach.

Steve, welcome back to chat about this important subject!

Always a pleasure Mark. I love what you do here and I follow your journey. Continue Reading…

Q&A with MyOwnAdvisor’s Mark Seed on speculating near Retirement

Posted By Jonathan Chevreau | January 26, 2021

Mark Seed’s MyOwnAdvisor website has just published a Q&A with Yours Truly. The Hub often republishes Mark’s blogs here (with his permission of course) and this Q&A covers topics like dividend investing, asset allocation ETFs, hybrid strategies using both and even crypocurrencies.

You can find the original blog by clicking here, or you can read the republished version below:

Mark Seed: “Fun money” is an apt term for monies you can afford to lose. I mean, nobody wants to lose money on purpose of course but there is always an undeniable trade-off when it comes to investing.

Risk and return and related.

Higher risks can signal a higher potential return. Higher risks taken can also signal flat-out failure.

I was curious to hear about how some retirees or semi-retirees invest and keep speculation in their portfolio.

So, I reached out to author, blogger and columnist Jon Chevreau for his thoughts including how much he speculates in his own portfolio, at age 67.

Jon has already contributed to My Own Advisor a few times.

Jon, welcome back to the site to discuss this interesting topic!

Jon Chevreau: Glad to be back Mark.

Mark: In our last post Jon, we talked about low-cost ETF investing, investing in stocks and more in your Victory Lap Retirement book.

Let’s back up a bit…

What should Canadians consider before Do-It-Yourself (DIY) investing? I mean, it’s not for everyone including those in retirement right?

Jon: No, DIY investing is probably not for everyone: some need good advice and like most things in life, you get what you pay for.

If you need a full-service advisor or a fee-based advisor that can add value not just on investments but on tax strategies, estate planning, retirement income, insurance and the like, then paying on the order of 1% a year of assets is not unreasonable. On the other hand, with interest rates so low, the more you can save on the fixed-income portion of a portfolio the better. That applies doubly to retirees, who should have a good percentage of their investments in fixed-income (say 40 to 60% depending on objectives and risk tolerance.) I often tell retired readers that if all they use is a discount brokerage in order to hold a Vanguard or iShares asset allocation ETF, that can be a good compromise: you get the equivalent of near professional stock-picking prowess via indexing, asset allocation and rebalancing all for a very good price; and you could then hire a fee-only financial planner for specific guidance outside that pure investing realm.

(Mark: you can find many of those asset allocation all-in-one ETFs here.)

Mark: Seems wise Jon.

So, given some aspiring retirees might not want to invest entirely alone, what good options might be available to help them out (beyond blogs like yours and mine of course)!? Ha!

Jon: I often direct new or aspiring retirees who are worried about the shift from wealth accumulation to generating regular retirement income to the books by good Canadian authors like Moshe Milevsky, Daryl Diamond and Fred Vettese. Sites like yours and mine probably have reviewed these. There are also several retirement planning software packages that are worth considering; ViviPlan, Cascades and Retirement Navigator, to name three I once reviewed in a Globe & Mail article.

(Mark: you can find many references to those authors and their books below.)

Daryl Diamond – Your Retirement Income Blueprint

Fred Vettese – Retirement Income for Life

Fred Vettese – The Essential Retirement Guide

Mark: I’ve written about my plan to “live off dividends” and distributions in the early years of semi-retirement, while working part-time, to mitigate any negative sequence of returns risk.

As someone who is in their semi-retirement years, is that being overly cautious? What are your personal thoughts/approaches on trying to mitigate poor sequence of returns risks?

Jon: Market timing is always fraught with uncertainty so I tend to suggest sticking to your asset allocation plan and adhering to a relatively cautious variant of the 4% Rule. I’m cautious so personally start with a 3% rule: that is, whatever amount you have invested I try to withdraw only about 3% of the value per year. Hopefully, some combination of interest, dividends and capital gains will generate most of that 3% and if sometimes it means breaking a bit into capital, then accept that. We don’t live forever and the occasional down year from a stocks bear market will soon enough be followed by some very good years, like 2020 largely turned out to be. In bad years, be frugal and eschew travel if necessary; in good years, live a little but at least keep investing in your TFSAs. Diversification and asset allocation are our friends but keep in mind the Asset Allocation ETFs are mostly focused on the big three asset classes of stocks, bonds and a bit of cash.

With all this money printing by central banks to cope with COVID-19, I like to include some inflation hedges and so keep maybe 10% in precious metals/gold/silver/platinum and real estate is a good asset class for 5 to 10%, through REIT ETFs that can currently be acquired at bargain prices.

(Mark: Does the 4% rule still make any sense?)

Mark: I own a few REITs for that hedge myself: some REITs do seem very cheap now. Jon, I’ve long since argued that any path to financial wealth should be largely boring – save, invest, stay the course, focus on equities, diversify, minimize fees – and you should end up more than OK after a few decades of this simple path to wealth-building.

Yet the rise of cryptocurrencies, the recent tech boom, and other investing alternatives has me thinking there is absolutely some room for some/a small bit of speculative plays in a portfolio. So, I have a few questions for you.

First, what is your stance on that? I mean, how much should retirees speculate in their portfolio if at all?

Jon: Some believe retirees shouldn’t speculate at all but any retiree counting on current GIC rates will need a much bigger portfolio for that than when interest rates provided a reasonable return. Personally, even as I near age 68, I still invest a lot in technology stocks and lately I have even dipped my toes into cryptocurrencies. Continue Reading…

iShares All-Equity ETF – XEQT

XEQT Fees

XEQT Underlying Holdings

XEQT Top 10 Market Allocation

Share this:

Share this:

BMO Fixed Income ETFs

Q: Erika, investors are concerned about low bond returns, particularly from long-term government bonds. How should they think about the fixed income side of their portfolio?

Q: What about a retired investor who typically holds a 60/40 or 50/50 portfolio but is concerned about generating income in a low-yield environment?

Q: I’m a big fan of asset allocation ETFs to make DIY investing as simple as possible. But is it wise to unbundle ZGRO or ZBAL and hold multiple ETFs with the intention of avoiding long-term bonds in favour of shorter duration government bonds or corporate bonds?

Share this:

My retirement income plan and options

Generating retirement income

Share this:

Mark: I’ve written about my plan to “live off dividends” and distributions in the early years of semi-retirement, while working part-time, to mitigate any negative sequence of returns risk.

Share this:

Sign up for our Daily Digest E-Mail!