Tag Archives: investing

The “Brexit” no one saw coming, and what to do next

Polling financial literacy: results both encouraging and worrisome

graham-bodel
Graham Bodel

By Graham Bodel, Chalten Advisors

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) just released its 2016 CSA Investor Education Study, an assessment of financial literacy across the country.

Some of the findings are encouraging while others are a little bit worrying.

There are clearly still key gaps in investor knowledge and behaviour.  For example, while many investors rely exclusively on advisors for investment information and knowledge very few investors actually check to see that their advisor has the appropriate registrations.  Some other key points:

Risk Tolerance

To begin with, findings show that more and more people seem to be paying attention to their risk tolerance, which is great!  Risk tolerance is what should drive the mix of different investments that you hold, often referred to as asset allocation.  Risk tolerance is driven by your need, ability and willingness to take risk and should be informed by your current financial situation as well as near and longer term financial planning goals.  Risk tolerance can definitely change as your circumstances change or as you enter different stages of life so it is worthwhile checking periodically to ensure your investments are suitable for your risk tolerance.

Investment Knowledge

Survey respondents were asked to answer seven questions to assess general investment knowledge.  6 of 10 people answered 4 or more questions correctly, which is about the same as in previous surveys.  25% of respondents answered 6 of 7 questions correctly indicating a “high” level of investment knowledge.

Continue Reading…

A Walk along Risk Road #3 — The Disruptors vs. The Disrupted

MAWER_Cameron-Webster-4x6-Formal-blue-bg
Cameron Webster

By Cameron Webster, CFA

Institutional Portfolio Manager, Mawer Investment Management Ltd.

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

At Mawer, we spend a great deal of time asking and answering the question: So what? A company’s share price is down 6% … so what? A central bank moved interest rates up … so what? Google re-named itself Alphabet … so what?

It’s not always an easy question to answer and often leads us to ask even more questions in an effort to develop key investment insights.

“So what?” is one of the questions that can lead us to investment action (or inaction) in our process of building well-diversified, resilient portfolios. In an effort to pass on our “so what” learnings, I interviewed our Chief Investment Officer, Jim Hall, with specific questions pertaining to his views on risks in the current environment.

Cameron Webster: Jim, we decided at the conclusion of our slow growth world discussion that we’d address technological disruption. Let’s get into the “so what?” of it. What is technological disruption?

MAWER_Jim Hall 4x6 Formal blue bg
Jim Hall

Jim Hall: It’s many things. It has happened in many industries; rail to auto, telegraph to telephone, typewriter to word processing, CD’s to online music. Of interest to me is where an innovation ends up displacing a whole industry and the ones that support it—and sometimes changes society too.

For example, take e-commerce and the sharing economy. Companies like Uber and Airbnb are changing the economy in significant ways through the application of technology. These companies are growing very fast and they are stealing business from other companies. This may lead to lower growth overall, at least temporarily. That’s the disruption. This dynamic has been around a long time. Clayton Christensen called it “disruptive innovation” and John Maynard Keynes called it “technological unemployment.” Many people have written and talked about the consequences of structural economic disruption over the years—and many are fretting about it now.

CW: How does the disruption manifest itself? Continue Reading…

Stop making investing mistakes, avoid junk science

stevelowrie
Steve Lorie

By Steve Lowrie, Lowrie Financial

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

You probably first heard this classic joke years ago. Maybe you even laughed at it once or twice:

Patient: “Doctor, doctor, it hurts when I do this.”

Doctor: “Then stop doing it.”

Yes, it’s silly … and yet wise. We’ve all been known to ignore what is painfully obvious, especially as investors.

For example, even though we know it’s a mistake to buy high and sell low, there’s ample evidence that this is exactly what most of us end up doing anyway. In “How Investors Leave Billions on the Table,” Wall Street Journal columnist Jason Zweig shared a litany of analyses on how investors lose available returns through hyperactive trading. Zweig published his post in 2013, but human nature hasn’t changed, so the stats undoubtedly remain relevant: We’re hard-wired to trade at all the wrong times.

Why we make mistakes

Continue Reading…

Navigating a U.S. election year stock market

patmckeough
Pat McKeough, TSINetwork.ca

By Pat McKeough, TSINetwork.ca

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

The U.S. election year stock market rule can be profitable for investors in any political climate.

As we’ve pointed out in the past, an election year stock market tends to go on an above-average rise in U.S. Presidential election years. This provides a statistical rationale for optimism in 2016, since the next election is this November. But it’s no guarantee that the market will rise substantially, for a couple of reasons.

First, several ominous factors are weighing on the market right now, in addition to the election. These include the outlook for interest rates; the trend in prices for oil and other commodities; the rise in terrorist activity; the Chinese economic slowdown; and the sharp rise in the U.S. dollar and corresponding drop in the Canadian dollar.

An abrupt shift in any of these factors could have a big influence on the market for the remainder of the year and beyond.

Obama diverging from usual pattern

Second—more important—the election-year indicator works because U.S. politicians have a characteristic way of behaving during these years. President Obama is diverging from the traditional pattern that helped spur market gains in past election years.

Continue Reading…