Debt & Frugality

As Didi says in the novel (Findependence Day), “There’s no point climbing the Tower of Wealth when you’re still mired in the basement of debt.” If you owe credit-card debt still charging an usurous 20% per annum, forget about building wealth: focus on eliminating that debt. And once done, focus on paying off your mortgage. As Theo says in the novel, “The foundation of financial independence is a paid-for house.”

Early Retirement Q&A with Dividend Daddy

Posted By |
Image courtesy Tawcan/Unsplash

By Bob Lai, Tawcan

Special to Financial Independence Hub

The Financial Independence Retire Early (FIRE) community is a very supportive and tight-knit one. Because the community is made up of folks who have different backgrounds and different ages, it’s very diverse (not just Caucasian bros from high tech).

Earlier this year, after having been financially independent for a while, Dividend Daddy decided to step away from work to pursue other passions! Since stepping away from work, Dividend Daddy has been travelling around the globe and enjoying life.

I’m happy to have Dividend Daddy joining me today on the latest Early Retirement Q&A.

Q1: Welcome back Dividend Daddy. Congratulations on reaching FIRE and stepping away from full-time employment. Can you tell us a little bit about yourself? 

 

I’m in my late 40s and Canadian. I worked in high pressure roles for my working career and this January, I pulled the plug on full-time work. With return to office mandates clashing with my desire for work location freedom, work was no longer tenable for me so I stepped away. As of July 2025, I’ve been retired for 7 months and travelling a ton.

Tawcan: Amazing stuff!

Q2: You and I utilize hybrid investing, a combination of individual dividend stocks and low-cost ETFs. What made you decide on utilizing hybrid investing in the first place? 

Replicating the Canadian stock market is super easy so I buy individual Canadian dividend stocks and get the dividend tax credit for doing so.

Internationally, in the U.S. and world, it’s very hard to do that yourself so buying an index fund like $VTI and an ETF like $XAW just makes sense.

Q3:What made you decide to finally pull the plug and step away from full-time employment? Walk me through your decision process.

It was a mix of mental burnout and circumstances at my job that led to my early retirement. Of course, I had done the “math” several times and early retirement was possible financially for me.

Being financially independent meant that I had the control to decide my future. If work arrangements no longer suited my needs, I could walk away from them. So, that’s what I did.

At this stage, I wanted time freedom more than I did the next pay cheque.

Tawcan: that makes a lot of sense. In some level I’m probably there too.

Q4: Tell me more about your plans for this new chapter of your life.

Right now, it’s all about travel. I’m doing a ton of it and I have to say, it’s great without having the stress of work or a job on your mind.

I’m not travelling with a laptop for the first time in a very long time. Just my smartphone. Being untethered from your job while travelling is so very freeing, mentally and physically. It’s wonderful.

Q5: Prior to stepping away from full-time employment, did you do a lot of soul-searching to determine what you plan to do in early retirement? Why is this an important process for early retirement? 

I did do some soul-searching and planning. Nothing rigorous, trusting myself to figure it out. Some planning is important because you suddenly have many more hours in a day and week to fill.

For me, I increased the amount of pickleball I play (when I’m at home), I cycled way more at home and abroad, increased the amount of time I spend at my second home in Mexico (to avoid those nasty Canadian winters), and have been travelling a ton more.

Q6: I know you were considering doing part-time work with your previous employer. Did that ever happen? Why or why not? 

I did not end up doing part-time work with my employer. Circumstances changed at my employer and that flexibility was no longer available.

I may end up doing some very limited consulting in the future but that’s not on the table for 2025 or 2026. I do miss aspects of my work.

Q7: Tell me a bit more about your portfolio withdrawal strategy. I believe you plan on withdrawing from non-registered (N) and registered (R), and leaving TFSA (T) untouched for as long as possible? Are you planning to collapse your RRSP early? Or do you envision converting RRSPs to RRIFs at some point?

Not sure completely yet on strategy but I’ve only been early retired for 7 months as of July 2025. I’m definitely spending dividends from my non-registered account with a cash reserve/bucket of $75,000.

I will reinvest most dividends from my RRSP and all of them from my TFSA. I will need to seek professional advice for what to do with my RRSP going forward and whether spending it down is advisable give tax planning purposes.

Q8: Why is it important to “learn” how to spend money and enjoy life a bit more in retirement rather than a “save-save-and-save-some-more” mentality so many FIRE seekers tend to have? 

Life is short. This hits you as you approach 50 years old. My parents’ generation is starting to pass on and I know I’m next in line (hopefully a long way off still). Continue Reading…

The Critical Element of Bonds  

Posted By |
Image from Shutterstock, courtesy Outcome

Pleased to meet you
Hope you guess my name
But what’s puzzlin’ you
Is the nature of my game

  • Sympathy for the Devil, by The Rolling Stones

 

 

 

By Noah Solomon

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Historically, bonds have offered investors two main benefits. Firstly, their yields provided a reasonable, if unspectacular return. Secondly, they offered diversification value, muting overall portfolio losses during bear markets.

In my view, it is the second attribute that is the most important. In relative terms, bonds are not particularly useful for providing investors with strong long-term returns (that’s equities’ job!). So, by process of elimination it follows that the primary function of bonds is their diversification value.

When comparing equity strategies, one should compare their relative returns, volatilities, Sharpe ratios, drawdown characteristics, etc. However, given bonds’ primary purpose of providing diversification, an extra layer of diligence is required when evaluating bond strategies. Specifically, you should analyze their differing correlations to equities, and by extension their varying abilities to offset stock price declines during challenging environments.

There is no Free Lunch Part I

Economist and Nobel Prize recipient Milton Friedman famously stated, “There is no such thing as a free lunch,” which means that every choice has a cost, even if it’s not immediately obvious.

Traditional bond mandates each have their individual advantages and pitfalls with respect to returns, risks, and diversification properties. In terms of the tradeoff between risk and return, history strongly suggests that there is no clear free lunch to be had.

Risk vs. Return by Bond Type: 2000 – 2024

 

As the above table illustrates, there is a clear relationship between the returns of the various segments of the bond market and the maximum losses that they have sustained over the past 25 years. If you want extra return, you can reasonably expect to suffer larger losses in bad times. That being said, large losses in bond holdings are generally not what investors want or expect.

There is no Free Lunch Part II

Not only is there no free lunch with respect to the tradeoff between risk and return, but there is also none when it comes to diversification value. Higher returns are not only associated with larger losses but are also associated with higher correlations to equities.

Return vs. Correlation to Stocks by Bond Type: 2000 – 2024

Bonds that offer higher returns have a greater tendency to move in tandem with stocks, thereby providing less ability to mitigate stock losses during bear markets. In contrast, lower-return bonds possess greater diversification properties and thus are better equipped to offset stock-price declines during times of equity market turmoil.

None of the above: Sometimes there’s Nowhere to Hide

Notwithstanding the fact that higher-return bonds have on average suffered more severe losses and offered less diversification value than their lower return counterparts, these relationships have exhibited significant variations across different bear markets. Continue Reading…

Book Review: The Wealthy Barber (2025 fully revised edition)

Posted By |

Special to Financial Independence Hub

 

Many aspects of personal finance have changed in the 36 years since The Wealthy Barber classic book first appeared.

To update it, author David Chilton had to not only do an extensive rewrite, but he had to come up with new advice.  He did a great job of making The Wealthy Barber 2025 update fully relevant to Canadians today.

Chilton takes important topics that are usually dry and hard to understand and brings them alive in an entertaining story format. But this book is much more than just a fun take on personal finances; the advice is excellent.  Chilton gives insights you won’t find elsewhere.  The book is like a course on personal finance requiring no previous knowledge, and even discussions of insurance and wills are funny and compelling enough to be page-turners.

The bulk of the book is a set of financial lessons mainly aimed at Canadians between 20 and 45.  The early chapters introduce the characters, make it clear that the lessons require no prior expertise, and that the lessons really will help with seemingly impossible problems like the high cost of housing.  These early chapters do a good job of convincing readers that they really can improve their financial lives.

Between the jokes and identifying with the characters, readers will find themselves enjoying lessons that would normally be boring.  Chilton uses dialogue to emphasize important points, to voice objections to his advice, and to clarify common misunderstandings.

I often find things I disagree with in books, but that really isn’t the case here.  Chilton had to make some tough decisions about which details to include and which to leave out, and most readers could come up with a topic or nuance they wish was covered.  One topic I think could have made the cut is that some investors think they don’t pay investment fees.  I’ve heard people recommend their advisor because he doesn’t charge any fees.  All advisors get paid out of their clients’ money in one way or another, no matter what anyone says to the contrary.

I won’t try to summarize the lessons because the result wouldn’t be useful.  Without Chilton’s explanations of the whys behind his advice, too much would be lost.  Instead, I’ll comment on several areas.

Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Chilton didn’t really discuss AI except to make a good joke that I won’t spoil.  He was asked the question “What happens if AI takes away most of our jobs and the economic system collapses?”  There are some bad things AI could do such as cyber war, monitoring all of our actions, preventing us from doing “unapproved” things, and limiting our movements.  However, I don’t see negatives in AI doing jobs for us.  If AI together with machines will eventually grow our food, make clothes and other goods, and build houses, why will we need money?  Until we get to that point, we’ll still need money and people to do jobs.

Pay yourself first

One of the book’s characters says “Save first, spend the rest, good.  Spend first, save the rest, bad.”  This core piece of advice survived from the original book, but there are some caveats now.  For example, some diligent savers “offset the growing value of their assets on their net-worth statements with matching, or near matching, debts on the liability side.  From excessive car loans to large credit-card balances to massive lines of credit, many [live] beyond their means to a scary level.”

Watching other people, I’m convinced that it’s important to set aside savings from your pay first and then spend later, but my wife and I are weirdos who never needed to do this.  Our natural tendency to spend little usually left plenty of savings at the end of each pay period.  We’re the type who had to learn to spend more as our income and savings grew.

Index investing

I thought the passage explaining why we should just buy all stocks instead of trying to pick the best ones was well done.  It included “No, we can’t just buy the winners.  No, there is no way for us to consistently pick them ahead of time.  No, the people we hire to do it for us aren’t any good at it either.”

Like most experts who are trying to help their audiences, Chilton is a fan of all-in-one asset allocation ETFs.  “Not only does the fund buy the individual stocks for you, it does so across the world,” and “These funds also do all the rebalancing for you.”  These funds handle everything so there is no need to monitor your progress.  In fact, to avoid making emotional decisions, you’re best to “pay almost no attention” to the daily or weekly changes in the value of your savings.

“One of the most important factors, if not the most important, as you choose what type of investments to make, is the associated time frame.  How long are you able to set the money aside?  How long until you need it?”  Stocks in the form of all-in-one ETFs are for the long term.  For something like a house down payment, “unless I thought my purchase was at least five to seven years away,” I wouldn’t invest it aggressively.

Starting early

I’m a fan of advising people to start the saving habit early.  Chilton gives an example to motivate this advice where saving $1000 per month for 8 years is more valuable than saving $1000 per month for the subsequent 24 years.  Continue Reading…

CMHC: Why it’s Time to rip off the Bandaid

Posted By |
By Kevin Fettig
Special to Financial Independence Hub

 

CMHC [Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation] is unique among federal entities. As a Crown Corporation, it carries out securitization and insurance operations under a corporate mandate while also receiving public funding for federal policy initiatives. Once funding is allocated, CMHC reports to its board rather than the minister responsible on a day-to-day basis.

This differs from the typical departmental reporting model, which has created issues for the PMO, particularly as housing became such a hot-button political issue. Over time, the Department of Infrastructure and Communities evolved into Housing, Infrastructure and Communities, and CMHC’s reporting shifted to the department rather than directly to the minister.

As budgetary spending responsibilities have gradually been peeled away from CMHC, the structure has become more complex and confusing. Policy responsibilities now overlap between the department and CMHC, and some areas – such as addressing homelessness – are jointly managed.

Reducing Chronic Homelessness

A 2022 Auditor General of Canada report found federal efforts to reduce chronic homelessness have been ineffective because departments lack clear accountability for the National Housing Strategy’s target of reducing chronic homelessness by 50 per cent. The report also found that federal departments and CMHC did not know whether their initiatives were effectively improving housing outcomes. In addition, it highlighted a lack of coordination among various federal housing and homelessness programs.

The fragmentation of roles has worsened with the creation of Build Canada Homes, a $13 billion plan to build social housing, starting with development on public land. The initiative is designed to speed up delivery, strengthen Canadian supply chains, and ensure homes are affordable and sustainable over the long term. It focuses on a Canadian, factory-built, net-zero housing platform capable of delivering quickly in major cities, rural communities, and the North.

In the past, CMHC was responsible for social housing programs, typically under Section 95 of the National Housing Act, providing funding for non-profit and co-operative housing. More recently, new initiatives have included the Federal Community Housing Initiative, the Co-operative Housing Development Program, and preservation funding to support asset management planning.

Do 3 agencies make sense for social housing?

Does it make sense to have three agencies responsible for social housing? These agencies have demonstrated poor accountability when responsibilities overlap. Consolidating CMHC’s social housing activity under Housing, Infrastructure and Communities or under Build Canada Homes  could create a more streamlined and cost-effective framework for delivering on policy.

This would allow CMHC to focus on its two commercial mandates – securitization and insurance – while retaining some housing finance activities that require a commercial perspective for reviewing and underwriting loans. Continue Reading…

This Financial Literacy Month, Reverse Mortgages aren’t the only way (HESAs are)

Posted By |
Photo courtesy Home Equity Partners

By Shael Weinreb, CEO and Founder of The Home Equity Partners

Special to Financial Independence Hub

November marks Financial Literacy Month, a time when Canadians are encouraged to “Talk Money” and build confidence in their financial decisions. When it comes to one of the biggest financial assets we own, our homes, though, that conversation is still far too narrow.

Right now, one message dominates the conversation: if you’re a homeowner struggling with affordability, a reverse mortgage is your best bet. Reverse mortgage rates are dominating headlines, even for retirees aging in place, but it’s making the alternative financing conversation biased and incomplete.

There’s no denying that reverse mortgages can be useful for some. They provide cash on hand, but they also saddle investors with new debt, compound interest, and a shrinking equity stake over time.

As someone who spends every day helping homeowners unlock equity without new debt, I see the same pattern over and over. People feel backed into a corner because they’re told they only have one choice. That needs to change.

The Alternative no one’s talking about

There’s another way to access your home equity, one that doesn’t involve taking on more debt or losing control of your home. It’s called a Home Equity Sharing Agreement (HESA).

Here’s how it works: a HESA gives you a lump sum today in exchange for sharing a portion of your home’s future appreciation. You keep full ownership and control. There are no monthly payments, no interest, and no loan sitting on your balance sheet.

When you sell (or buy out the agreement), the investor shares in your home’s gain or loss. It’s a partnership, not a payday loan in disguise.

This model works for a much broader group than reverse mortgages: homeowners under 55, people who can’t borrow enough through traditional channels, or anyone who wants to protect their equity while sharing market risk.

At The Home Equity Partners, we’ve helped clients use this model to pay off debt, fund renovations, or supplement retirement income without taking on new financial stress.

Why you haven’t heard of it

The simple answer? Awareness. Most advisors are trained on debt-based tools such as mortgages, HELOCs, and lines of credit because that’s what the industry sells. Reverse mortgages fit neatly into that mold. HESAs don’t. Continue Reading…