Inflation

Inflation

Franklin Bissett overweights defensive stocks over traditional Canadian sectors like Energy & Financials

 

Despite a looming recession acknowledged by most of the financial industry, Franklin Templeton Canada is relatively upbeat about the prospects for both Canadian stocks and fixed income over the short- to medium-term. In a Toronto event on Wednesday aimed at financial advisors and the press, Garey J. Aitken, MBA, CFA — Calgary-based Chief Investment Officer for Franklin Bissett Investment Management — described how he has been positioning his Franklin Bissett Canadian Equity Fund somewhat defensively. (There was also a webinar version of the event.)

As you can see from the above breakdown of the fund, Aitken is way overweight defensive sectors like Consumer Staples relative to the index: the S&P/TSX composite. In Canada, consumer staples amounts to the major grocery stores like Loblaw and Metro: there’s little along the lines of such American staples giants as Proctor & Gamble or Colgate Palmolive. Aitken said his fund has owned Saputo Inc. since its IPO in the late 90s, and has long owned Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.

The fund has been overweight consumer staples for more than a year: as the chart shows, he was overweight this defensive sector by a whopping 730 basis points a year ago and this year is even more overweight by 770 bps. He is also overweight the other big defensive sector, Utilities, by 210 bps, compared to overweight by 110 bps a year ago. The third major defensive sector globally is Health Care, but the Canadian stock market has only minimal exposure to that sector.

Aitken has moved from a small underweight position in industrials a year ago to a modest overweight in 2023 of 170 bps. And he is slightly overweight Information Technology by 140 bps, compared to a small underweight of 20 bps a year ago.

Underweight Energy, Financials & Materials

On the flip side, the fund has been and continues to be underweight in the three big sectors for which the Canadian stock market is famous: Energy, Financials & Materials. Financials (chiefly the big Canadian banks) were underweight 330 bps a year ago and Aitken has moved that to an even bigger 730 bps underweight this year. In Materials he has stayed largely pat, with a 530 underweighting today compared to a 550 bps underweighting a year ago.

The chart below shows the fund’s holding in Canadian financials. You can see that among the big Canadian banks, the fund is over the index weighting only for the Bank of Nova Scotia, and is slightly overweight Brookfield Corp. and Brookfield Asset Management:

 

However, Aitken has moved Energy (Canadian oil & gas stocks, pipelines etc.) from a small 20 bps overweight position last year to a 370 bps underweighting in 2023. The chart below shows the major Energy holdings relative to the index, with overweights in certain less well-known names: 

 

Aitken remains slightly underweight Consumer Discretionary stocks, moving from a 100 bps underweight last year to 150 bps underweight currently. Real estate is almost flat: from a slight 10 bps underweighting a year ago to a small 70 bps underweight today.  Continue Reading…

Book Review: Bullshift

www.dundurn.com/books

By Michael J. Wiener

Special to the Findependence Hub

In his book Bullshift: How Optimism Bias Threatens Your Finances, Certified Financial Planner and portfolio manager John De Goey makes a strong case that investors and their advisors have a bias for optimistic return expectations that leads them to take on too much risk.  However, his conviction that we are headed into a prolonged bear market shows similar overconfidence in the other direction.  Readers would do well to recognize that actual results could be anywhere between these extremes and plan accordingly.

 

Problems in the financial advice industry

The following examples of De Goey’s criticism of the financial advice industry are spot-on.

“Investors often accept the advice of their advisers not because the logic put forward is so compelling but because it is based on a viewpoint that everyone seems to prefer. People simply want happy explanations to be true and are more likely to act if they buy into the happy ending being promised.”  We prefer to work with those who tell us what we want to hear.

Almost all advisers believe that “staying invested is good for investors — and it usually is. What is less obvious is that it’s generally good for the advisory firms, too.”  “In greater fool markets, people overextend themselves using margin and home equity lines of credit to buy more, paying virtually any price for fear of missing out (FOMO).”  When advisers encourage their clients to stay invested, it can be hard to tell if they are promoting the clients’ interests or their own.  However, when they encourage their clients to leverage into expensive markets, they are serving their own interests.

“There are likely to be plenty of smiling faces and favourable long-term outlooks when you meet with financial professionals.”  “In most businesses, the phrase ‘under-promise and over-deliver’ is championed. When it comes to financial advice, however, many people choose to work with whoever can set the highest expectation while still seeming plausible.”  Investors shape the way the financial advice industry operates by seeking out optimistic projections.

“A significant portion of traditional financial advice is designed to manage liabilities for the advice-givers, not manage risk for the recipient.”

“Many advisers chase past performance, run concentrated portfolios, and pay little or no attention to product cost,” and they “often pursue these strategies with their own portfolios, even after they had retired from the business. They were not giving poor advice because they were conflicted, immoral, or improperly incentivized. They were doing so because they firmly believed it was good advice. They literally did not know any better.”

De Goey also does a good job explaining the problems with embedded commissions, why disclosure of conflicts of interest doesn’t work, and why we need a carbon tax.

Staying invested

On the subject of market timing, De Goey writes “there must surely be times when selling makes sense.”  Whether selling makes sense depends on the observer.  Consider a simplified investing game.  We draw a card from a deck.  If it is a heart, your portfolio drops 1%, and if not it goes up 1%.  It’s not hard to make a case here that investors would do well to always remain invested in this game.

It seems that the assertion “there must surely be times when selling makes sense” is incorrect in this case.  What would it take for it to make sense to “sell” in this game?  One answer is that a close observer of the card shuffling might see that the odds of the next card being a heart exceeds 50%.  While most players would not have this information, it is those who know more (or think they know more) who might choose not to gamble on the next card.

Another reason to not play this game is if the investor is only allowed to draw a few more cards but has already reached a desired portfolio level and doesn’t want to take a chance that the last few cards will be hearts.  Outside of these possibilities, the advice to always be invested seems good.

Returning to the real world, staying invested is the default best choice because being invested usually beats sitting in cash.  One exception is the investor who has no more need to take risks.  Another exception is when we believe we have sufficient insight into the market’s future that we can see that being invested likely won’t outperform cash.

Deciding to sell out of the market temporarily is an expression of confidence in our read of the market’s near-term future.  When others choose not to sell, they don’t have this confidence that markets will perform poorly.  Sellers either have superior reading skills, or they are overconfident and likely wrong.  It’s hard to tell which.  Whether markets decline or not, it’s still hard to tell whether selling was a good decision based on the information available at the time.

Elevated stock markets

Before December 2021, my DIY financial plan was to remain invested through all markets.  As stock markets became increasingly expensive, I thought more about this plan.  I realized that it was based on the expectation that markets would stay in a “reasonable range.”  What would I do if stock prices kept rising to ever crazier levels?

In the end I formed a plan that had me tapering stock ownership as the blended CAPE of world stocks exceeded 25.  So, during “normal” times I would stay invested, and during crazy times, I would slowly shift out of stocks in proportion to how high prices became.  I was a market timer.  My target stock allocation was 80%, but at the CAPE’s highest point after making this change, my chosen formula had dropped my stock allocation to 73%.  That’s not much of a shift, but it did reduce my 2022 investment losses by 1.3 percentage points.

So, I agree with De Goey that selling sometimes makes sense.  Although I prefer a formulaic smooth taper rather than a sudden sell-off of some fraction of a portfolio.  I didn’t share De Goey’s conviction that a market drop was definitely coming.  I had benefited from the run-up in stock prices, believed that the odds of a significant drop were elevated, and was happy to protect some of my gains in cash.  I had no idea how high stocks would go and took a middle-of-the-road approach where I was happy to give up some upside to reduce the possible downside.  “Sound financial planning should involve thinking ahead and taking into account positive and negative scenarios.”  “Options should be weighed on a balance of probabilities basis where there are a range of possible outcomes.”

As of early 2022, “the United States had the following: 5 percent of global population, 15 percent of global public companies, 25 percent of global GDP, 60 percent of global market cap, 80 percent of average U.S. investor allocation, the world’s most expensive stock markets.”  These indicators “point to a high likelihood that a bubble had formed.”  I see these indicators as a sign that risk was elevated, but I didn’t believe that a crash was certain.

When markets start to decline

“If no one can reliably know for sure what will happen, why does the industry almost always offer the same counsel when the downward trend begins?”

Implicit in this question is the belief that we can tell whether we’re in a period when near future prices are rising or falling.  Markets routinely zig-zag.  During bull markets, there are days, weeks, and even months of declines, but when we look back over a strong year, we forget about these short declines.  But the truth is that we never know whether recent trends will continue or reverse.

De Goey’s question above assumes that we know markets are declining and it’s just a question of how low they will go.  I can see the logic of shifting away from stocks as their prices rise to great heights because average returns over the following decade could be dismal, but I can’t predict short-term market moves.

Conviction that the market will crash

‘In the post-Covid-19 world, there was considerable evidence that the market run-up of 2020 and 2021 would not end well.  Some advisers did little to manage risk in anticipation of a major drop.”

I’ve never looked at economic conditions and felt certain that markets would drop.  My assessment of the probabilities may change over time, but I’m never certain.  I have managed the risk in my portfolio by choosing an asset allocation.  If I shared De Goey’s conviction about a major drop, I might have acted, but I didn’t share this conviction. Continue Reading…

Fraudsters more active than ever but less than half of us take protective measures

Image www.antifraudcentre-centreantifraude.ca/

Yes, it’s March, also dubbed Fraud Prevention Month. To mark it, a TD survey has been released that finds fraudsters are getting more persistent as the cost of living keeps soaring.

While 62% of Canadians agree they are being targeted now more than ever, a whopping 46% haven’t taken any measures to educate themselves or take protective measures in the past year.

Among the findings:

  • 47% believe the rising cost of living and other financial hardships will expose them to more scams
  • 78% don’t have much confidence in their ability to identify fraud or scams
  • 54% feel stressed or anxious about financial fraud
  • 31% are too embarrassed to tell anyone if they were the victim of a fraud or scam
  • 66% of Gen Z and 44% of Millennials admit they wouldn’t tell someone if they were swindled

The full press release is here.

“As Canadians report being targeted by a record number of financial fraud attempts, many can benefit from using the tools and resources available to protect themselves and their loved ones,” says Mohamed Manji, Vice President of Canadian Fraud Management at TD in the release, “It’s very important to exercise caution, especially at a time when fraudsters may take advantage of the economic challenges many Canadians are currently facing. In addition to the robust security measures TD has in place for its customers, the best defence against financial fraud is being aware and knowing how to spot it.”

Both TD and the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre offer a comprehensive library of articles discussing the latest trends in scams and measures Canadians can take to enhance their awareness and avoid falling victim to fraudsters.

Targeting mostly via e-mail or telephone 

The survey found 72% of Canadians reported being targeted by email/text message fraud, up 14 percentage points from last year, while 66% were targeted over the phone. Oddly, the poll finds Fraudsters seem to be pivoting away from social media, with only 26% targeted this way, 10 percentage points less than 2022.

Those polled were most concerned about identity theft (52%), title fraud (23%) and fake emergencies (20%).

Factors likely to increase vulnerability to fraud include age (43%),  loneliness or isolation (35%), moving recently to Canada (34%) and financial hardship or job loss (32%).

“We’re seeing more fraudsters preying on customers through the ‘grandparent’ or ’emergency’ scam,” adds Manji. “This cruel crime is often successful because it exploits someone’s desire to care for their loved ones. If you get a call from somebody claiming to be a family member or friend in immediate need of funds, hang up the phone and call them back using a number you have for them.”

TD says that with 31% saying they’d be too embarrassed to tell anyone if they were a fraud or scam victim, it’s clear there’s some stigma in talking about this type of crime. If someone believes they’ve fallen victim to a scam, they should immediately report it to their financial institution, local police department, credit bureaus (Equifax and TransUnion) and the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre.

How can Canadians protect themselves?

TD recommends the following tips and advice: Continue Reading…

Best stocks for new investors seeking profits share these qualities

Image courtesy TSInetwork.ca

Finding top stocks for new investors is easier when you know what to look for. Discover the types of stocks to invest in and some investments to avoid.

We caution investors to maintain a healthy sense of skepticism at all times. It’s especially crucial for investment newcomers to observe this rule.

Here are some recommendations on the types of stocks for new investors to focus on: and ones to avoid.

Focus on investment quality  

The best investment plans or systems use a variation of the value investing approach. That is, they revolve around choosing high-quality investments and diversifying your holdings.

Safer investing also means taking a careful and methodical approach to investing that does not jeopardize your savings or your investment goals. There will always be some inherent risk when investing, so making safer investing decisions lets you minimize that risk.

The safest way in our view for Successful Investors to invest money is to place a lot of importance on investment quality.

We do our own stock market research for our newsletters and investment services, and we apply it from a portfolio manager’s perspective. That’s why we advise sticking to mostly well-established companies; they tend to hold on to more value when things go wrong and recover faster.

Zero in on dividend-paying investments

One tip we share often is to invest in companies that have been paying a dividend for 5 or more years. Dividends are typically cash payouts that serve as a way for companies to share the wealth they’ve accumulated. These payouts are drawn from earnings and cash flow and are paid to the shareholders of the company. Typically, these dividends are paid quarterly, although they may be paid annually or even monthly. Canadian citizens who own shares in Canadian stocks that pay dividends will also benefit from a tax break.

Building a diversified portfolio of top stocks for new investors

Always maintain a diversified stock portfolio: and avoid the temptation of trying to pick hot stocks or sectors.

Different investors may be more comfortable holding a larger or smaller number of investments in their portfolios. Here are some tips on diversifying your stock portfolio:

When it comes to a diversified stock portfolio, stocks in the Resources, and Manufacturing & Industry sectors in general expose you to above-average share price volatility.

  • Stocks in the Utilities and Canadian Finance sectors entail below-average volatility.
  • Consumer stocks fall in the middle, between volatile Resources and Manufacturing companies, and more stable Canadian Finance and Utilities companies.

Most investors should have investments in most, if not all, of these five sectors. The proper proportions for you depend on your temperament and circumstances.

Investments that should be avoided: Cryptocurrencies & IPOs

I still can’t think of anything that would make me optimistic on bitcoin or any cryptocurrency, even after the deep slump the whole sector has gone through recently. The best thing I can say about bitcoin is that it will probably remain volatile, rather than vaporizing like the worst crypto performers. Continue Reading…

Is short-termism hurting your investment?

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Are you a patient investor? Or are you looking at your portfolio multiple times a day, having the itch to sell everything? Despite having done DIY investing for over a decade and making my shares of investment mistakes in the past, I am still learning about investing on a daily basis.

One key lesson I’ve learned is short-termism will hurt your investment. As investors, we need to have patience and a long term view.

What is short-termism?

Per Wikipedia, short-termism is giving priority to immediate profit, quickly executed projects and short-term results, over long term results and far-seeing action.

On the surface, it seems that short-termism is associated with investment strategies like day trading, momentum trading, short selling, and options trading. However, I believe many investors that invest in individual dividend stocks and passive index ETFs often fall into the short-termism trap as well.

How so?

On one hand, it’s about short-term profit taking. On the other hand, it’s about paying too much attention to the short-term share price movement and feeling the need to tweak your investment portfolio. Some common portfolio management questions I’ve seen on Facebook and Twitter are:

“Should I take profits when the stock goes up and re-invest the money later? Give me a reason why I shouldn’t sell and should just hold?”

“I purchased Royal Bank at $110. It’s frustrating seeing the share price going up to $150 and then dropping back down to $125. Should I sell when the stock is at a 52-week high and buy back when the stock price dips?”

“I have a small paper loss on Brookfield Asset Management, I don’t think the company is doing well, should I sell and invest the money elsewhere?”

“I bought some Apple shares recently. Apple had a terrible quarter and I’m down. I’m convinced that Apple is going to crash and burn. Should I sell and run now?”

And the questions go on and on…

Why do we fall into the short-termism trap?

There are many reasons why we fall into the short-termism trap. Some of the common reasons I believe are:

  • The need to be correct – we as investors want to see our investments increase in value once we make the purchase. When this happens, it means we’re right and made the correct investment decision. If the share price goes down, that must mean we are wrong and are terrible at investing. The need to be correct becomes a burning desire. Nobody wants to be told that they are wrong and be the laughingstock.
  • The need to be validated – we all have the need to be validated by others but for some reason, this need is even stronger when it comes to investing. We want others to validate that we made the right investment decision so we can feel good inside. The desire to be validated can be like drugs, once someone validates you, you begin to want even more. The need to be validated is a very slippery slope…
  • Looking for gains right away – It’s exciting to see investment gains. It is even more exuberating to see significant gains in a few days. It’s like going to the casino and winning 1000 times on your bet or winning the lottery. Why wait for five years to see multi-bagger gains when you can get the same type of gains in a week? Long-term investing is for losers!
  • Ego – for some reason we all believe we are better investors than who we truly are. Believe me, I fall into this trap from time to time. Deep inside, we believe that we can predict how companies will do in the future accurately by looking at past performance and public information.

How to escape the short-termism trap?

So how do we escape the short-termism trap? I think the best method is to understand your short-term, medium-term, and long-term goals. Are you investing for the short-term or are you investing for the long-term? Knowing this will dictate what kind of investments you should buy. Continue Reading…