Building Wealth

For the first 30 or so years of working, saving and investing, you’ll be first in the mode of getting out of the hole (paying down debt), and then building your net worth (that’s wealth accumulation.). But don’t forget, wealth accumulation isn’t the ultimate goal. Decumulation is! (a separate category here at the Hub).

Fine Wine: The Alternative Asset for today’s challenges 

Posted By |

By Atul Tiwari

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

The current market backdrop is making the case for alternative assets, such as fine wine, even stronger. Traditional financial asset classes have grown expensive and concentrated, and initiating or increasing an exposure to fine wine can provide important diversification and enhance potential returns.  

It is no secret that equity valuations are stretched. The massive levels of fiscal and monetary stimulus globally have propped up asset prices despite ongoing disruption from the COVID-19 pandemic. The S&P 500 price/earnings ratio exceeded 30 in mid-April, its highest level since the 1990s dotcom bubble, which did not end well for investors. With a potential economic recovery following vaccine rollouts largely priced in, prices appear to leave limited upside in the near term. 

Investors will also struggle to find attractive returns in the bond market. Even before the pandemic, yields globally were low, or even negative. Again, the downside appears to outweigh the upside as the recent selloffs in government bonds indicate.  Both fixed income and equity markets remain susceptible to a shift in the economic outlook or macro policy, which should prompt investors to consider alternative ways to diversify their portfolios.  

The increasing concentration of equity markets forms another reason why alternative assets make sense in the current backdrop. The sky-high equity returns of the past year have come overwhelmingly from the tech sector with the FAANG stocks — Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google (Alphabet) — significantly outperforming the wider market. Consequently, ETFs and other index-linked investments may not be as diverse as they might appear.  

This is where fine wine can help. As a real asset, fine wine prices are primarily driven by their own market dynamics, meaning they have low correlation to traditional asset classes and can help de-link an investment portfolio from swings in the wider markets.  

Fine wine’s limited and decreasing supply over time (as wine is consumed) alongside demand that goes beyond wine’s immediate benefit as a financial instrument can support wine prices regardless of the wider macro environment. Indeed, prior to the recent tech stock surge, fine wine often delivered better performance with significantly lower volatility over a range of backdrops going back to before the financial crisis.  

Healthy returns with low volatility  

Comparison of volatility and annualised return across financial assets 

 

Source: S&P, Bloomberg, Liv-ex & ishares. Data as of 31 Mar 2021  Continue Reading…

Mutual Fund Deferred Sales Charges designed to hide bad news

Posted By |

By Michael J. Wiener

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Mutual fund investors caught by deferred sales charges (DSCs) understand their downside.  They’d like to sell their funds but face penalties as high as 7% if they sell.
DSCs are set to be banned across Canada (but only restricted in Ontario) in mid-2022.  Until then, mutual fund salespeople masquerading as financial advisors can still sell funds with DSCs to unsuspecting investors.
[Editor’s Note: last week, Ontario announced it would be joining the other provinces in banning DSC as of mid-2022.]

Before DSCs existed, it was common for advisors who sold mutual funds to get a “front-end load,” which is a fancy term for giving some of an investor’s money to the advisor or the advisor’s employer.  So, an investor might invest $50,000 with an advisor, but the first account statement might show only $47,500.  The missing $2500 was a 5% front-end load offered as an incentive to the advisor to hunt for mutual fund buyers.

Not surprisingly, investors didn’t like to see a big chunk of their savings disappear like this.  Mutual funds had a problem.  They needed to give commissions to advisors so they would sell mutual funds, but investors didn’t like to see some of their money disappear.  The solution to this dilemma came in two steps.

Raising Annual Fees

Mutual funds charge annual fees to investors called the Management Expense Ratio (MER).  MERs are expressed as a percentage of invested assets, and while they seem small, they build up to intolerable levels over decades.  Many mutual fund investors don’t know about MERs and don’t notice their corrosive effects.

One way to cover the cost of advisor commissions is to simply raise a fund’s MER.  This works well when investors stay for the long term.  When investors stay longer than 5 years, a one percentage point  increase in the MER covers a 5% up-front advisor commission.

But what happens when an investor sells out of the fund after less than 5 years?  In this case, the mutual fund can’t recover the advisor commission.  Even, worse, advisors would have an incentive to move investor money frequently from fund to fund to collect more commissions, and investors wouldn’t mind because it wouldn’t cost them anything.

Deferred Sales Charges (DSCs)

Someone had the bright idea to charge investors penalties when they leave a fund too soon.  Today, it’s common for DSC funds to charge investors as much as a 7% penalty for withdrawing their money in the first year.  This penalty typically declines each year until it’s gone after investor money has been in a fund for 7 years. Continue Reading…

Who speaks for the Self-Directed investor?

Posted By |

By Ian Duncan MacDonald

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Recently I read an article by a financial advisor with “25 years of experience in dealing with individual investors.”

He sees his role as a coach helping” investors ignore Wall and Bay Street hype and hysteria ….” As he sees it, only investment advisors can protect investors from themselves.  He sees these ignorant self-directed investors as, “piling into the market after superior stock returns and before inferior returns,” “ignoring tax ramifications” and foolishly “investing for entertainment.”

When you give access to your money to an advisor you are immediately creating the potential for that advisor to use your money in their self-interest: not yours.   While this advisor does address investment advisor fees, “The financial regulators require us to disclose them.” He does not touch upon the seemingly daily reporting of investment advisor thefts of client money nor all the “legal” but murky ways that investment advisors can siphon of your money.

(The “full-service fee schedule” account you signed probably allows all the following fees to be charged against your investment account: operating fees such as custody fees, interest charges on debit balances, fees for manages and fee-based programs, transaction fees, foreign transaction tax, issuer commissions, service fees, fee for managing funds, deferred sales charge, referral fee, etc). Self-directed investors are shielded from almost all of these fees.

On rare occasions investment advisors get charged with theft:

“Posted On Wednesday March 24, 2021

The Halton Regional Police Service – Fraud Unit has arrested a Burlington man in relation to a fraud investigation.

The accused was an investment industry professional who worked for a financial company that was registered with the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC).  Between 2011 and 2016, two victims invested a total of approximately $1.6 million with the accused to purchase insurance and other investments. The accused diverted the funds he received from the victims to his own bank accounts.”

The following is just the last month’s reporting of investment advisor IIROC disciplinary hearings plus their last statistical complaints report:

Release Date Title
5/4/2021 In the Matter of Edward Ho Rha – Adjournment Related Documents
4/30/2021 In the Matter of Joan McCarthy – Set Date Appearance Related Documents
4/30/2021 In the Matter of James Robert Harris– Settlement Hearing Related Documents
4/21/2021 In the Matter of Neil DiCostanzo – Adjournment Related Documents
4/20/2021 In the Matter of Bonnie Wyatt – Settlement Accepted Related Documents
4/16/2021 In the Matter of Alberto Storelli – Discipline Hearing Related Documents
4/13/2021 In the Matter of Joseph Anthony Thomson and Douglas Gerald McRae – Discipline Hearing Related Documents
4/8/2021 Staff Policy Statement – Early Resolution Offers
4/7/2021 In the Matter of Dean Martin Jenkins – Penalty Decision Related Documents
4/1/2021 In the Matter of Thomas Stock – Appearance to set a hearing date Related

Statistics Filed by Dealer Firms (COMSET)

“IIROC rules require Dealer Members to inform IIROC, using IIROC’s Complaints and Settlement Reporting System (ComSet), when certain events occur, including when a Dealer Member receives a written client complaint, when criminal charges are laid against a Dealer Member or any of its individual registrants, or when a securities-related civil claim is brought by a client.” Continue Reading…

The hidden costs of DIY Financial Planning: Bad Investments cost more than you think

Posted By |

Today’s Simple Investing Take-Away: Simple investing mistakes can result in bad investments that can derail your long-term financial goals and erode your emotional well-being. One of the biggest missteps, amplified by our behavioural tendencies, is to ignore the many hidden costs of DIY investing. Even if the price paid isn’t obvious, it still takes a toll on your results.

 

Lowrie Financial

 

By Steve Lowrie, CFA

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Eager to embrace DIY investing? Or have you at least wondered whether you’ve got what it takes to succeed on your own?

I understand the appeal. When you engage a personal financial advisor, you’ll see their advisor fees, loud and clear. The financial regulators require us to disclose them. Plus, at least here at Lowrie Financial, we want you to see them. How else can you tell if you’re getting a fair shake?

But therein lies a dilemma. Thanks to behavioural finance, we know about a multitude of murky costs that can slip in when investors allow their rational resolve and simple investing strategies to be hijacked by their complex instincts and emotions. Some of these self-inflicted costs include:

  • The cost of chasing past returns by getting caught in a “fad” during up markets; or by panicking and selling out during scary times
  • The cost of ignoring tax ramifications of frequent trading in taxable accounts
  • The cost of investing as a form of entertainment, or experimenting with your financial future while learning the ropes

Once you factor in the bad investments and other prices paid by so many DIY investors, financial advisor fees start to seem well worth it. A reputable advisor should help you focus on your personal financial goals while avoiding these and other DIY investing pitfalls.

The cost of chasing Past Returns

Have you heard of “FOMO” or “Fear of Missing Out”? It’s that itchy feeling you get when you long to get in on a red-hot popularity contest, regardless of whether it fits into your financial plan.

Most recently, others seem to be making millions on all sorts of “silly season” exotica: from SPACs and Reddit-fueled stock runs, to cryptocurrency and NFTs. In real time, these may seem like simple investing decisions; jump on the bandwagon and make a ton of money, fast. Unfortunately, by the time you’re aware of a trend on a tear, you’ll be hard-pressed to buy in low enough, sell out high enough, and do both consistently enough to come out ahead in the long run. This means odds are heavily stacked against FOMO-driven investors who try to come out ahead (but usually fail) by chasing after winning streaks.

There are reams of academic inquiries pointing to the merits of more patient simple investing strategies for capturing expected long-term market growth. Recently, a University of British Columbia/Emory University study found (once again) that individual investors in Canada and around the globe tend to underperform the same stocks and markets in which they’re invested. Digging into why, the study’s co-authors found investors created extra self-inflicted investment volatility (nearly 50% higher) by piling into the market “after superior stock returns and before inferior returns.”

These findings only add to a volume of past studies into similar return-chasing adventures. By succumbing to FOMO investing and similar bad investment habits, DIY investors unnecessarily sacrifice available market returns.

The cost of ignoring Tax Ramifications

These days, many people are working from home, with more time to spend consuming financial media or social media forums. A simple look at these investing forums would lead you to believe that everyone from your co-worker, to your favorite sports hero, to popular financial gurus like Canada’s own Chamath Palihapitiya are supposedly seizing big profits and cutting losses in rapid-fire trades day after day. It seems so easy.

Again, if we look at the evidence, the after-cost, after-tax results usually fall short of a simple buy-and-hold approach. In a recent extreme example, a U.S. day-trader used $30,000 in cash, placing 10–50 trades daily, to come out $45,000 ahead in 2020. Not bad. Unfortunately, by failing to understand U.S. tax regulations, like the wash-sale rule, he also generated an $800,000 tax bill on the realized gains. Continue Reading…

MoneySense Retired Money: How safe are REITs and REIT ETFs during the Covid recovery period?

Posted By |
MoneySense.ca: Photo by energepic.com from Pexels

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column has just been published: it looks at how much real estate should make up of an investment portfolio, either through direct ownership in physical real estate, or through more diversified REITs or REIT ETFs. Click on the highlighted headline for the full column: How much real estate should you have in a balanced portfolio? 

How much should real estate comprise in a balanced portfolio? While a principal residence certainly will be a big part of most people’s net worth, personally I don’t “count” it as part of my investment portfolio, even though it can ultimately serve as a retirement asset of last resort, via Home Equity Line of Credits (HELOCs), reverse mortgages or simply an outright sale when it’s time to enter a retirement or nursing home.

If you take that approach, and many of my advisor sources do, then the question becomes how much real estate should you have in your investment portfolio, above and beyond the roof over your head?

Certainly, if you are happy being a landlord and handy about home maintenance, direct ownership of rental apartments, duplexes or triplexes and the like is a time-honored route to building wealth. That’s the focus of organizations like the Real Estate Investment Network (REIN).

However, if you don’t want the hassle of being a landlord, you may want to try Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), which are far more diversified both geographically and by housing type. Some REITs focus on baskets in particular real estate sectors, such as residential apartments or retirement homes.

A still more diversified approach is to buy ETFs providing exposure to multiple major REIT categories, whether Canadian, US or international.

Adrian Mastracci, portfolio manager with Vancouver-based Lycos Wealth Management, says the REIT idea “makes sense” but suggests they should not make up more than 5 or 10% of an investor’s total wealth or not more than 7% of an equity portfolio. “I consider it part of the equity bucket. Publicly traded REITS trade more like equities than real estate.” He advises buying top-quality REITs (or ETFs holding them), diversified across Canada but avoids foreign ETFs because “you want the dividends taxed as Canadian dividends.”

Most of the major ETF suppliers with a Canadian presence have broad-based passively managed REITs although there is at least one actively managed one.

Major passive and active Canadian REIT ETFs

The Vanguard FTSE Canadian Capped REIT Index ETF (ticker VRE/TSX) was launched in 2012 and has a modest MER of 0.39%.  As the name implies, any one holding is capped at 25% of the total portfolio [typically this is RioCan.] Its mix is 22% retail REITs, 19.8% office REITs, 18.5% real estate services, 18.5% residential REITs, 8.5% industrial REITs, 8.1% diversified REITs and 4.6% real estate holding and development.

An alternative is XRE, the iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF, trading on the launched in 2020, which holds roughly 16 Canadian REITs, with weightings almost identical to VRE. The iShares product (from BlackRock Canada) has a slightly higher MER of 0.61%. Continue Reading…