Building Wealth

For the first 30 or so years of working, saving and investing, you’ll be first in the mode of getting out of the hole (paying down debt), and then building your net worth (that’s wealth accumulation.). But don’t forget, wealth accumulation isn’t the ultimate goal. Decumulation is! (a separate category here at the Hub).

How does Real Estate ROI compare to other investments?

By Penelope Graham, Zoocasa

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

If you ask a long-term homeowner whether they feel their home purchase has turned out to be a worthy investment, chances are they’ll say it was; real estate continues to be considered a safe and effective way to grow your money, according to 68% of homeowners who’ve owned a home for 10 years or longer, according to data collected by Zoocasa.

However, the Canadian housing market is coming off of an admittedly quieter year, with steep declines in sales activity recorded in some of the nation’s largest markets: The Greater Toronto Area, Greater Vancouver, and Calgary have all seen the number of homes changing hands plunge by double digit percentages, mainly due to the impact of tougher federal mortgage rules.

That has subsequently trickled down into home values, with the west coast markets posting year-over-year price declines, while the GTA experienced only moderate, single-digit growth.

So, does the old adage of real estate being among the wisest of investments still hold true? To find out, Zoocasa.com compared average year-over-year price performance to that of three popular investments:

  • The S&P / TSX Composite Index (-11.6%)
  • The S&P Canada Aggregate Bond Index (+1.5% y-o-y)
  • And a high-interest savings account (+1.1%)

Let’s take a look at how real estate price gains (or lack thereof) compared to the returns on these investments in the adjacent infographic.

GTA only market to outpace investment comparison

The GTA (Toronto) housing market ended the year on a positive note, posting an increase of 2.1% for the average home price of $750,180, and the only market to outpace all three investment types.

However, the market lost a considerable bit of steam over the course of the year, unable to hold onto the 9.9% gains achieved at the market peak in June, when prices hit an average of $807,871. Year-over-year December sales clocked in 16% lower than in 2017, which the Toronto Real Estate Board attributes to the federal mortgage stress test. This hurdle, introduced last January, requires borrowers to qualify at a higher rate than their actual contract rate, resulting in a smaller mortgage amount and squeezing affordability in an already expensive market.

“Higher borrowing costs coupled with the new mortgage stress test certainly prompted some households to temporarily move to the sidelines to reassess their housing options,” said TREB President Garry Bhaura, in the board’s December report.

Vancouver values fall from last year

It has been an especially painful year for the Greater Vancouver MLS, as sales have dipped a whopping 31.6% from December 2017: the lowest level of activity since the year 2000. That’s translated into an average price decline of 1.7% to $1,032,400. Continue Reading…

Is an RRSP right for you? Not necessarily

By Michael Wickware, CMO, Planswell

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

We’re all accustomed to seasonal advertising. Real estate listings in the spring, back to school sales in late summer, holiday sales in the fall, and at the start of every new year, financial industry ads urging you to contribute to your RRSP.

The traditional RRSP season is driven by two main factors:

1.) The rules say you have the first 60 days of each new year to make a contribution that can be applied to your previous years’ tax return.

2.) RRSPs are lucrative for banks and financial advisors, because you’re likely going to keep paying them fees every year from now until retirement.

You might ask, “Isn’t it also driven by the fact that RRSPs are a great way for Canadians to save money?” The billboards, posters, banners and sales pitches certainly seem to suggest as much. I may be a marketing guy, but I work at a financial planning company, so I know it’s not quite that simple.

Unless these advertisers actually know about your personal financial situation, how can they be so sure that an RRSP is the right answer for you? Does absolutely everybody need to contribute to an RRSP, or is there some nuance these Mad Men might be missing?

In my search for answers, I had one major advantage. Planswell has built more than 100,000 financial plans for Canadians. Every plan is based on analyzing dozens of data points about things like goals, income, assets, debts, investments, insurance and more. In other words, I know more than any bank or ad agency about what individual people actually need to get ahead financially.

I asked our engineering team to dig into the data, and what we found definitely challenges the conventional wisdom:

An RRSP was wrong choice 52% of the time!

I didn’t think an RRSP was the best choice every time, but the gap between what the marketing campaigns are saying and what people actually need is a lot wider than I expected. It turns out the annual RRSP ad blitz, backed by all the biggest financial institutions in Canada, has been giving bad advice to half the country.

We decided to dig deeper, and found several reasons why an RRSP may not be the best choice for you. Here are three of the top reasons:

1.) It won’t always maximize your tax savings

An RRSP is not meant to avoid tax completely: just to put it off until you retire. The idea is to reduce your taxable income while you’re working and in a relatively high tax bracket, then pay the tax when you’re retired and in a lower tax bracket. But if you’re already in a low tax bracket, this strategy doesn’t work. And, if you’re early in your career and expect to be in a higher tax bracket in the future, you might be better off letting your RRSP contribution room accumulate until you can use it for a bigger benefit.

2.) You have shorter-term priorities

An RRSP is a long-term retirement investment. You don’t want to be paying fees and taxes and losing contribution room by taking money out early. That means you should make sure that your short-term needs are covered first. For example, if you don’t already have an emergency fund set aside or if you’re planning to buy a home or make a major purchase within the next few years, you may not want to lock your savings away in an RRSP now.

3.) You could miss out on bigger opportunities

Let’s assume an RRSP makes sense from a tax point of view and that you have your short-term needs covered. You’re good to go, right? Not necessarily. Continue Reading…

5 reasons why your business should hire accountants

By Neil Coleman

(Sponsored Content)

Exceptional financial management is necessary for any company, whether large or small. As a business owner, you have your hands full with the operations and marketing strategies that should be implemented for the growth of your company. Fortunately, you can delegate finance and bookkeeping tasks to an accountant.

You have two options of hiring accountants for your enterprise. One way is to outsource it to a team of trustworthy certified public accountants (CPAs) like the experts from http://www.daviekaplan.com/. Another method is to hire in-house employees who can contribute their skills and previous experiences to monitoring this particular department.

Regardless of how you go about in recruiting accounting staff, here are the reasons why you should invest in them:

 1.) They help you maximize profit early on

Accountants are beneficial during the early stages of your company as they can advise you on what business model will be most useful for your venture and help you set attainable goals. They can also help calculate the pricing structure of your products and services to maximize profits. Moreover, accountants know the ins and outs of the banking system so they can set up your account successfully and determine if you need to open a merchant account.

2.) They organize your financial reports

Your  income statement or profit-and-loss account is a crucial financial document that showcases your business’ revenues and expenses during a specified time. By having an accountant onboard from day one, you can have the reports organized so that you can track your progress without difficulty.

Aside from the statement containing your profits and losses, these are two other essential financial reports that every business must have:

  • Balance Sheet: This gives you a glimpse of your company’s assets, liabilities, and shareholders’ equity. Assets are the valuable things owned by your business that are already in cash or can be converted to currency. Liabilities, also known as debts, are the amounts of money you owe others, whereas shareholders’ equity is the amount that you would end up with if you sold all your assets and paid off all the debts.
  • Cash-Flow Statement: This document details the company’s inflows and outflows of cash. It informs you if your company generates income or loses money during a period. Operating, investing, and financing activities can be found in this file.

These financial reports are vital for the compilation of annual reports. This document summarizes the performance of your business during the year and projections for the next twelve months. It includes audited financial statements that inform you and your investors about how well your company is doing.

3.) They save you from penalties

Your accountants can focus on the deadlines of government-mandated processes, such as taxes and social security contributions. The IRS can be exceptionally nitpicky about filing deadlines and audits. Penalties for delayed payments and filing can be such a burden. Save yourself from the stress of remembering all those deadlines by hiring a dedicated team of accounting staff.

4.) They lend a hand in making smart financial decisions

As a business owner, you have multiple roles to take on each day. Your employees would ask for solutions on company-related matters, such as who to hire among the candidates and what marketing strategies to implement this week. Continue Reading…

Vanguard announces the passing of founder John C. Bogle

The investment industry is saddened to learn of the passing of Vanguard founder John C. Bogle today. A true giant of the industry, Bogle was virtually the creator of index mutual funds and ETFs, and passive investing in general. Below is the press release issued today by Vanguard, which we reprint in full. I have added a few subheads and made only very minor edits.  

VALLEY FORGE, PA (January 16, 2019) — Vanguard announces the passing of John Clifton Bogle, founder of The Vanguard Group, who died today in Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania. He was 89.

Mr. Bogle had legendary status in the American investment community, largely because of two towering achievements: He introduced the first index mutual fund for investors and, in the face of skeptics, stood behind the concept until it gained widespread acceptance; and he drove down costs across the mutual fund industry by ceaselessly campaigning in the interests of investors. Vanguard, the company he founded to embody his philosophy, is now one of the largest investment management firms in the world.

“Jack Bogle made an impact on not only the entire investment industry, but more importantly, on the lives of countless individuals saving for their futures or their children’s futures,” said Vanguard CEO Tim Buckley. “He was a tremendously intelligent, driven, and talented visionary whose ideas completely changed the way we invest. We are honored to continue his legacy of giving every investor ‘a fair shake.’”

Mr. Bogle, a resident of Bryn Mawr, PA, began his career in 1951 after graduating magna cum laude in economics from Princeton University. His senior thesis on mutual funds had caught the eye of fellow Princeton alumnus Walter L. Morgan, who had founded Wellington Fund, the nation’s oldest balanced fund, in 1929 and was one of the deans of the mutual fund industry. Mr. Morgan hired the ambitious 22-year-old for his Philadelphia-based investment management firm, Wellington Management Company.

Mr. Bogle worked in several departments before becoming assistant to the president in 1955, the first in a series of executive positions he would hold at Wellington: 1962, administrative vice president; 1965, executive vice president; and 1967, president. Mr. Bogle became the driving force behind Wellington’s growth into a mutual fund family after he persuaded Mr. Morgan, in the late 1950s, to start an equity fund that would complement Wellington Fund. Windsor Fund, a value-oriented equity fund, debuted in 1958.

In 1967, Mr. Bogle led the merger of Wellington Management Company with the Boston investment firm Thorndike, Doran, Paine & Lewis (TDPL). Seven years later, a management dispute with the principals of TDPL led Mr. Bogle to form Vanguard in September 1974 to handle the administrative functions of Wellington’s funds, while TDPL/Wellington Management would retain the investment management and distribution duties. The Vanguard Group of Investment Companies commenced operations on May 1, 1975.

The “Vanguard experiment”

To describe his new venture, Mr. Bogle coined the term “The Vanguard Experiment.” It was an experiment in which mutual funds would operate at cost and independently, with their own directors, officers, and staff—a radical change from the traditional mutual fund corporate structure, whereby an external management company ran a fund’s affairs on a for-profit basis.

“Our challenge at the time,” Mr. Bogle recalled a decade later, “was to build, out of the ashes of major corporate conflict, a new and better way of running a mutual fund complex. The Vanguard Experiment was designed to prove that mutual funds could operate independently, and do so in a manner that would directly benefit their shareholders.”

First index mutual fund in 1976

In 1976, Vanguard introduced the first index mutual fund — First Index Investment Trust — for individual investors. Ridiculed by others in the industry as “un-American” and “a sure path to mediocrity,” the fund collected a mere $11 million during its initial underwriting. Now known as Vanguard 500 Index Fund, it has grown to be one of the industry’s largest, with more than $441 billion in assets (the sister fund, Vanguard Institutional Index Fund, has $221.5 billion in assets). Today, index funds account for more than 70% of Vanguard’s $4.9 trillion in assets under management; they are offered by many other fund companies as well and they make up most exchange-traded funds (ETFs). For his pioneering of the index concept for individual investors, Mr. Bogle was often called the “father of indexing.”

1977: Direct to investors

Mr. Bogle and Vanguard again broke from industry tradition in 1977, when Vanguard ceased to market its funds through brokers and instead offered them directly to investors. The company eliminated sales charges and became a pure no-load mutual fund complex—a move that would save shareholders hundreds of millions of dollars in sales commissions. This was a theme for Mr. Bogle and his successors: Vanguard is known today for maintaining investment costs among the lowest in the industry.

A champion of the individual investor, Mr. Bogle is widely credited with helping to bring increased disclosure about mutual fund costs and performance to the public. His commitment to safeguarding investors’ interests often prompted him to speak out against practices that were common among his peers in other mutual fund organizations. “We are more than a mere industry,” he insisted in a 1987 speech before the National Investment Company Services Association. “We must hold ourselves to higher standards, standards of trust and fiduciary duty. Change we must—in our communications, our pricing structure, our product, and our promotional techniques.”

Mr. Bogle spoke frequently before industry professionals and the public. He liked to write his own speeches. He also responded personally to many of the letters written to him by Vanguard shareholders, and he wrote many reports, sometimes as long as 25 pages, to Vanguard employees — whom he called “crew members” in light of Vanguard’s nautical theme. (Mr. Bogle named the company after Admiral Horatio Nelson’s flagship at the Battle of the Nile in 1798; he thought the name “Vanguard” resonated with the themes of leadership and progress.)

In January 1996, Mr. Bogle passed the reins of Vanguard to his hand-picked successor, John J. Brennan, who joined the company in 1982 as Mr. Bogle’s assistant. The following month, Mr. Bogle underwent heart transplant surgery. A few months later, he was back in the office, writing and speaking about issues of importance to mutual fund investors. Continue Reading…

Is 2019 gold’s year to shine? A Q&A with Harvest president & CEO Michael Kovacs

Harvest Portfolios Group Inc. launched a global gold ETF yesterday (on January 15, 2019.) In the sponsored Q&A below, Harvest President & CEO Michael Kovacs explains why the company is launching the Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF (TSX: HGGG) now, the thinking behind this unique ETF and why the ETF aligns with the Harvest value strategy of conservative growth and income.

Why is Harvest launching a gold ETF?

We are not gold bugs, but we have been looking at the gold market for some time, especially gold company shares. They have been in a bear market for the better part of six years, so share prices are low. We see considerable value there.

A lot of the smaller companies are out of business because they couldn’t make money at these lower prices. Others that are struggling are being acquired by the big companies. Consolidation is a sign of a market bottom and while there is always downside risk in investing, we think a lot of that risk is out of the market.

So your focus is just the largest global producers?

Yes. If you’re a large firm you’re able to take advantage of the situation.  So we looked at the top global gold companies – the biggest by market cap – and are focusing on just the top 20. So if gold rises there is a lot of upside potential.

The other thing is that we’re in the late stages of the economic cycle. I don’t know whether we are in the ninth inning, or we have some extra innings ahead, but at some point US markets will start to weaken. Interest rates will top out and probably decline. We will see some decline in the US dollar as well. The US dollar has been on a tear and like any cycle it will probably come to an end.

At that point investments like gold make a lot of sense. There’s inherent leverage in the equities if gold prices rise.

Why is that?

In a simplified example, let’s say you are Barrick Gold Corporation producing gold at $800 an ounce. Gold is worth about $1,250 an ounce, so your margin is $450. If gold rises by $250 to $1,500, you’re increasing your profit margin by 55%. That goes directly to the bottom line.  So we think it is an opportune time to be looking at large gold producers.

Are you worried about inflation?

We do not see a lot of inflation. There may be some inflationary pressures, but the world has changed so much with technology. Continue Reading…