All posts by Jonathan Chevreau

10 tips to simplify your way to Financial Independence

life is simple but we insist on makingit complicatedIn many ways, financial independence is intimately linked with the related themes of voluntary simplicity, inconspicuous consumption and what we call (in the books and e-books) guerrilla frugality.

This blog from Midway Simplicity was published a couple of years ago but nicely picks up on all these themes.

Here at the Financial Independence Hub, we often cite the definition of Financial Independence found at Wikipedia.

But the author of today’s linked blog also has a nice definition:

“Becoming financially independent means having enough money, so that it doesn’t become the main concern or worry in your life. It means having enough money to freely live your life on your own terms. It means that the paycheck doesn’t have control over you anymore and that you can experience life freely and openly.”

Hard to argue with that definition.

So how to you achieve it? The secret is simplicity itself:

“… You achieve financial independence when your income is significantly higher than your needs. 

To achieve that you have to either:

  1. Reduce your needs.
  2. …or increase your income.”

Why Financial Independence is a better goal than retirement

Here’s a piece I wrote a year ago that got picked up by another blog. It pretty well sums up the point of the Financial Independence Hub. You can go to the posting in the Retirement and Good Living blog but since I wrote it (the author credit they provide is J. Chevreau), I’m republishing it here below. Go to the link and you’ll see four comments below, including one reader who says they “love the contraction of financial and independence to give you findependence! Good stuff.”

By Jonathan Chevreau

One of the problems with selling the concept of Retirement to young people is that old age just seems so impossibly far away in the distant future. The financial services industry and the mass media love to talk about retirement but let’s face it, if you’re a recent college graduate just entering the workforce, retirement is perceived as something far far in the future, just one step before the equally remote prospect of death.

Findependence far more accessible for young than Retirement

The pity is there’s a much better term that could be substituted for Retirement. It’s called Financial Independence or what I’ve dubbed “Findependence.” (simply a contraction of the two words.)

Financial independence is a goal that can be achieved not 30 or 40 years from now but in 10 or 15 years. It’s not unreasonable for a 25 year old just taking their first step on the career ladder and embarking on marriage, family formation and home ownership to set a goal of financial independence (or “Findependence”) by the time they’re age 40.

Findependence is not synonymous with Retirement

Relaxed businesswoman talking on mobile phone at home officeDoes that mean “early retirement” at such a tender age? No, because Findependence is not synonymous with Retirement. Most of us know what Retirement is but for a refresher course on Financial Independence, go to Wikipedia and search the term Financial Independence. You’ll find an entry which is simple enough to grasp: financial independence is the state of being able to have enough financial wealth to live “without having to work actively for basic necessities.”

If you’re findependent, your assets generate income greater than your expenses. Note that Findependence is not correlated with age. If you have modest means and have been frugal enough to build up a nest egg in 10 or 15 years, you may well be “findependent” by age 40 or so. Conversely, if you’re a high-earning high-spending professional who requires hundreds of thousands of dollars of income a year, findependence may not be in your grasp even by the traditional age of retirement.

You can see why people often confuse the terms since two ways of generating passive income is often employer pensions and Social Security or other pensions paid by governments. These particular income sources do not begin until one’s late 50s or 60s. But again, if your needs are modest, you might well be able to establish early findependence solely with a portfolio of dividend-paying stocks, perhaps supplemented by part-time jobs or freelance work.

Boomertirement

For baby boomers, the so-called “New Retirement” will often prove to be a variant of Findependence and traditional Retirement. Very few boomers, even if they have the financial means, will embrace the traditional “full-stop” retirement of their parents who enjoyed Defined Benefit pension plans. The older generation may have experienced the gold watch and a quarter century of golf, bridge, reading but boomers are much more likely to embrace a semi-retirement that consists partly of employer pensions, supplemented by government pensions, taxable investment income and part-time employment income, and perhaps the fruits of certain creative endeavors: royalties from literary or musical creations, licensing fees from various entrepreneurial ventures, fees from serving as corporate directors and other sources of income.

 

Whither oil?

Oil Wells Means Power Source And DrillingWhat’s going on with oil? Not a day goes by without extensive commentary on (literally) the fuel of the industrial economy worldwide. Plunging oil prices. Keystone and pipelines to the southwest or Canadian east? At the Financial Post this weekend, two of six trending topics are Keystone XL and oil prices. Baker Hughes may or may not merge with Halliburton. Fracking and the shale revolution continues to bring the United States closer to energy self-sufficiency. Saudi Arabia seems happy to supply the West with cheap oil even as that puts the squeeze on nations like Iran and Russia, and other petro nations that desperately need much higher oil prices. And what of Canada’s oil sands? Also in the Post, Yadullah Hussain ties together many of these disparate threads a piece headlined Who will blink first as global oil prices collapse?

Not the consumer, surely? Our family runs two hybrid vehicles but we’re still happy to be able to buy cheaper gas. Airlines and the travel industry surely welcome this development.

What about peak oil?

What ever happened to peak oil? Have we heard from Jeff Rubin lately? Here’s a piece from Canadian Business written two years ago about whether his call was wrong. His book suggested sky high oil prices meant we’d curtail travel and become more local. Luxuries like salmon would become prohibitively expensive?

Weren’t higher oil prices supposed to be inflationary? And wasn’t that supposed to be bad for the stock market? So aren’t low prices to be cheered, unless of course you’re overweight oil stocks?

Here at the Hub, we don’t profess to have all the answers but we will endeavour to point to sources that can shed light on complex geopolitical topics like this one.

This is a theme we will keep close tabs on.

Momentum not slowing for “Light Advice” model, (aka Robo-advisers)

A few days ago here at the Hub, we spoke on behalf of the new “Light Advice” startups in Canada and declared “Don’t call us Robo-Advisers.” That’s because most of them have plentiful access to real humans if clients so desire it.

I’ve updated that blog and noted that so far I’ve heard from clients of Wealth Simple, but not yet the other major players. Those willing to tell us about their experience (with or without your real name, as you wish) can email me at jonathan@findependenceday.com.

Just today, I wrote an update on this for the Investor Education Fund’s Getting Smarter About Money blog. The thrust of the piece is to describe what this model is all about and whether it’s appropriate for you.

Core & Explore Redux

MotleyFoolMotley Fool Canada just posted my latest blog for them, which addresses the question of whether it’s possible to combine indexing (“Core”) and high-conviction stock-picking or the judicious choice of certain sector ETFs. (“Explore.”)

As I note in the piece, this is a followup to Preet Banerjee’s feature story on this topic last year in MoneySense. It also features a nod to MoneySense stock-picking guru Norm Rothery, who also writes for the Globe and Mail, and publishes his own Stingy Investor newsletter.

Strange Bedfellows

I’ve commented before in the editor’s note at MoneySense that Norm is a strange bedfellow to indexing guru Dan Bortolotti, who runs the Canadian Couch Potato blog. It was Dan along with his colleague Justin Bender at PWL Capital who I was thinking of when in the Motley Fool post I referred to “indexing purists” who generally scoff at the notion of poisoning the purity of indexing with such an unsavoury activity as picking stocks. Another indexing purist I had in mind was Mike Bayer at Burgeonvest Bick. You can can find Dan, Justin and Mike all listed at the “Getting Help” section here at the Hub.

And yet when at MoneySense we got reader feedback to Preet’s story, it seemed that more often than not in the real world of actual investing behaviour, fairly sophisticated do-it-yourself investors often engaged in a blend of stock- or sector-ETF picking and traditional “Core” use of low-cost broadly diversified ETFs. (What Vanguard founder John Bogle recommends and no doubt the Bogleheads discussion forums.)

Foolish or foolish?

As I asked at the end of the piece for the Fool, do you think Core & Explore is a foolish practice (that’s with a lower-case f, so a bad thing) or a Foolish thing (that’s with an upper case F in FoolLand and therefore a good thing)?

Please email me at jonathan@findependenceday.com and we’ll do a followup piece on this, either here or for another media outlet, or probably both.