All posts by Jonathan Chevreau

Franklin Templeton Canada unveils suite of low-cost passive Regional and Country ETFs

On the heels of BMO’s entry into the low-cost asset allocation ETF space (see Hub blog here), one of the world’s largest active money managers has unveiled a suite of low-cost passively managed regional and country ETFs for the Canadian market.

Franklin Templeton Investments Canada today announced the expansion of its Franklin LibertyShares ETF offerings with its first suite of passive ETFs. (Franklin LibertyShares originally entered Canada in 2017 with four actively managed funds branded as Franklin LibertyShares).

The new passive funds gives investors exposure to a specific region or country at rock-bottom fees (below 10 basis points). It says (and I agree) that the management fees for these new Canada, United States, Japan and Europe (excluding U.K.) passive ETFs are amongst the lowest in the industry, ranging between 5 to 9 bps.

The company says these include the first Japan passive ETF and Europe (excluding U.K.) passive ETF available on a Canadian exchange. The ETFs are market-cap weighted.

In a press release, Franklin Templeton Investments Canada president and CEO Duane Green said: “With market-moving events like trade tensions and Brexit, investors and their advisors as well as institutional investors are looking to precisely act upon specific country and regional market views … These new passive ETFs provide Canadian investors with individual country and regional exposure options … at a very low cost.”

Here are the new ETFs and their ticker symbols:

Franklin FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (FLCD) invests primarily in equity securities of Canadian issuers, seeking to replicate the performance of FTSE Canada All Cap Domestic Index. The management fee is 5 bps.

Franklin FTSE U.S. Index ETF (FLAM) invests primarily in equity securities of mid- and large-capitalization U.S. issuers, seeking to replicate the performance of FTSE USA Index. Management fee is 7 bps.

Franklin FTSE Japan Index ETF(FLJA) invests directly or indirectly, primarily in equity securities of mid- and large-capitalization Japanese issuers, seeking to replicate the performance of FTSE Japan Index. Fee 9 bps.

Franklin FTSE Europe ex U.K. IndexETF(FLUR) invests primarily in equity securities of mid- and large-capitalization issuers in developed markets in Europe excluding the United Kingdom, seeking to replicate the performance of FTSE Developed Europe ex U.K. Index. Fee 9 bps. Continue Reading…

FP: RRSPs still have at least 3 advantages over TFSAs

My latest Financial Post column has just been published. It being the height of RRSP season, it looks at some well-known and some less well-known advantages RRSPs still have over the new kid on the block: TFSAs. Click on the highlighted text for the full story online: Three reasons why RRSPs still matter — and one of them you probably didn’t know. The article is also in Wednesday’s print edition on page FP6 under the headline RRSPs still matter despite rise of TFSAs.

The Tax-free Savings Account (TFSA), which was introduced just over ten years ago, is often described as the “mirror imaqe” of the RRSP. That is, the RRSP provides an upfront tax deduction by lowering your taxable income for the year you make the contribution. The TFSA does not, which can be a strike against it in some eyes; on the other hand, once you reach retirement, the TFSA comes into its own by NOT being taxable, and therefore not resulting in clawbacks of Old Age Security (OAS) benefits or (for very low-income seniors) the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) to the OAS.

On the other hand, as many seniors are discovering to their chagrin, all those RRSP tax savings you enjoyed during your (hopefully) high-income earning years come back to haunt you: once the RRSP becomes a Registered Retirement Income Fund (RRIF) at the end of the year you turn 71 (the alternative is the unpalatable act of cashing it all out and being taxed then and there, or annuitizing), then you’ll be on the hook for forced annual — and taxable — RRIF withdrawals. Ottawa giveth and Ottawa taketh away.

But, as the FP piece argues, some decades can elapse between an RRSP contribution and the ultimate RRIF withdrawals, and when you add in the ongoing tax sheltering of an RRSP — on top of the upfront tax contribution — then the experts quoted in the piece believe the RRSP comes out, certainly if you’re at or near the top tax brackets.

Below is the arithmetic provided by Mathew Ardrey, wealth adviser at TriDelta Financial, which was too long to include in the FP version. He cites the example of someone who has $10,000 of income and can invest in either a TFSA or a RRSP:

 

Same tax rate
RRSP TFSA
Income before taxes to save $10,000 $10,000
Tax at 50% $0 ($5,000)
After-tax available to contribute $10,000 $5,000
FV with 5% return for 25 years $33,864 $16,932
Tax at 50% ($16,932) $0
After-tax withdrawal in retirement $16,932 $16,932
Lower tax rate in retirement
RRSP TFSA
Income before taxes to save $10,000 $10,000
Tax at 50% $0 ($5,000)
After-tax available to contribute $10,000 $5,000
FV with 5% return for 25 years $33,864 $16,932
Tax at 25% ($8,466) $0
After-tax withdrawal in retirement $25,398 $16,932
Higher tax rate in retirement
RRSP TFSA
Income before taxes to save $10,000 $10,000
Tax at 25% $0 ($2,500)
After-tax available to contribute $10,000 $7,500
FV with 5% return for 25 years $33,864 $25,398
Tax at 50% ($16,932) $0
After-tax withdrawal in retirement $16,932 $25,398

 

Tridelta Financial’s Matthew Ardrey

“The part of the example I would focus on, is what is a reality for many Canadians, their income is higher while they are working than in retirement. Because of this, there is a clear advantage of receiving the deduction at a higher marginal tax rate and paying tax in retirement at a lower marginal tax rate,” Ardrey concludes.

Foreign income taxed less harshly in RRSPs than TFSAs

But that’s not all! As the FP column mentions, there are at least two other advantages RRSPs have over TFSAs. One is that foreign income is taxed more in TFSAs than in RRSPs: Continue Reading…

Vanguard unveils 2 more Asset Allocation ETFs

A year after Vanguard Canada shook up the ETF industry with its ground-breaking suite of three Asset Allocation ETFs (VGRO, VBAL, VCNS) it today followed up with two new iterations, bringing the total to five.

As you can see from the adjacent illustration, the two new ETFs include an all-equity ETF, VEQT; and a very conservative fund, VCIP, dubbed the Vanguard Conservative Income ETF Portfolio, which is 80% in fixed income. (The previous conservative entry, VCNS, was 60% fixed income). Both new ETFs begin trading on the TSX today.

Note that the color key above applies to BOTH funds: that is, Orange refers to four equity ETFs contained in both funds; blue refers to the three fixed-income ETFs that are present only in VCIP, since VEQT is 100% equity/orange. At least one sharp-eyed reader has noted the potential for confusion here.

In any case, the original suite of three ETFs were hailed by the financial press, including Yours Truly here and for the MoneySense ETF All-stars. The newcomers are further along the risk spectrum (100% equities) or further along the conservative income spectrum. And consumers have responded, injecting more than $1 billion into them, according to Kathy Bock, Managing Director of Vanguard Investments Canada Inc. Vanguard Canada now offers 39 ETFs, containing a total of C$17 billion in assets under management.

Here is the description of the two new ETFs contained in a press release:

Vanguard Conservative Income ETF Portfolio (TSX: VCIP) – The Vanguard Conservative Income ETF Portfolio seeks to provide a combination of income and some long-term capital growth by investing in equity and fixed income securities with a strategic allocation of 20% equities and 80% fixed income, made up of seven underlying Vanguard index ETFs.

Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio (TSX: VEQT) – The Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio seeks to provide long-term capital growth by investing primarily in equity securities with a strategic allocation of 100% equities, made up of four underlying Vanguard index ETFs.

Vanguard Canada head of product Tim Huver said “Canadian investors have embraced our ‘all-in-one’ asset allocation ETFs based on their sound portfolio construction, low-cost and simplicity. These ETFs have been among our most popular over the past year and we are committed to giving Canadians greater flexibility by offering two new investing options on both sides of the risk profile spectrum.”

Retired Money: Whether you’re a stock or a bond may determine when to take CPP/OAS

When to take CPP/OAS? My latest MoneySense Retired Money column passes on a fresh perspective on the old topic of whether you should take CPP or OAS early or late. You can find the full piece by clicking on the highlighted text here: Why aggressive stock investors should consider taking CPP early.

One of the main sources cited in the piece is fee-for-service financial planner Ed Rempel, who has contributed guest blogs to the Hub in the past. See for example Should I take CPP early? Some Real Life Examples or Delay CPP and OAS till 70? Some case studies.

Ed Rempel

When he recently turned 60, Rempel opted himself to take CPP himself because of course he considers himself primarily a “stock” when it comes to investing (using the concept from Moshe Milevsky’s book, Are you a stock or a bond?). He figures he can get good enough returns by investing the early CPP benefits that he will more than make up for the higher payouts CPP makes available for waiting till 65 or 70. Same with OAS, which he figures even balanced investors should take as soon as it’s on offer at age 65.

The corollary of this is that if you consider yourself primarily a fixed-income investor, then you should probably take CPP and perhaps OAS too closer to age 70. Compared to taking CPP at 65, taking it at 70 results in 42% more payments, while OAS is sweeter by 36% by delaying the full five years.

The MoneySense piece also quotes retired financial advisor Warren Baldwin, who chose to take CPP himself by age 66. Like Rempel and most financial advisors, Baldwin has a healthy exposure to equities. But he also cites a couple of other reasons for his decision. Baldwin, (formerly with T. E. Wealth), figures the value of the CPP fund to pay you the pension at age 65 is at least $250,000: more if you factor in its inflation indexing. The latter is an important consideration, especially for those (like Yours Truly), whose Defined Benefit pensions are not indexed to inflation.

Baldwin took his own CPP at 66, a year after his final year of full-time employment income. He did so “mainly for the cash flow and portfolio maintenance.”  But Baldwin has other reasons too. “I do not want to leave the CPP too long into the future in case the government changes the terms on it or the rate of income tax might rise … Look at how many changes they have made in the last 20 years.”

If a retiree’s marginal tax bracket jumped from 35% to 45%, Baldwin says deferred CPP would face a heavier tax load, while if benefits are taken earlier they would be taxed at more modest rates. And if retirees also have significant sums accumulated in RRSPs and RRIFs, the extra income might push up their Marginal Tax Bracket.

CPP survivor benefits also need to be considered

Warren Baldwin

Finally, Baldwin considers the “estate value” of CPP. “If two spouses have the maximum CPP and one dies, the survivor will not get much from the ‘survivor-ship’ aspect of CPP … So, if the ‘value’ of the CPP at 65 is in the range of $300,000, then if you die before you collect, there is quite a loss. Continue Reading…

Vanguard announces the passing of founder John C. Bogle

The investment industry is saddened to learn of the passing of Vanguard founder John C. Bogle today. A true giant of the industry, Bogle was virtually the creator of index mutual funds and ETFs, and passive investing in general. Below is the press release issued today by Vanguard, which we reprint in full. I have added a few subheads and made only very minor edits.  

VALLEY FORGE, PA (January 16, 2019) — Vanguard announces the passing of John Clifton Bogle, founder of The Vanguard Group, who died today in Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania. He was 89.

Mr. Bogle had legendary status in the American investment community, largely because of two towering achievements: He introduced the first index mutual fund for investors and, in the face of skeptics, stood behind the concept until it gained widespread acceptance; and he drove down costs across the mutual fund industry by ceaselessly campaigning in the interests of investors. Vanguard, the company he founded to embody his philosophy, is now one of the largest investment management firms in the world.

“Jack Bogle made an impact on not only the entire investment industry, but more importantly, on the lives of countless individuals saving for their futures or their children’s futures,” said Vanguard CEO Tim Buckley. “He was a tremendously intelligent, driven, and talented visionary whose ideas completely changed the way we invest. We are honored to continue his legacy of giving every investor ‘a fair shake.’”

Mr. Bogle, a resident of Bryn Mawr, PA, began his career in 1951 after graduating magna cum laude in economics from Princeton University. His senior thesis on mutual funds had caught the eye of fellow Princeton alumnus Walter L. Morgan, who had founded Wellington Fund, the nation’s oldest balanced fund, in 1929 and was one of the deans of the mutual fund industry. Mr. Morgan hired the ambitious 22-year-old for his Philadelphia-based investment management firm, Wellington Management Company.

Mr. Bogle worked in several departments before becoming assistant to the president in 1955, the first in a series of executive positions he would hold at Wellington: 1962, administrative vice president; 1965, executive vice president; and 1967, president. Mr. Bogle became the driving force behind Wellington’s growth into a mutual fund family after he persuaded Mr. Morgan, in the late 1950s, to start an equity fund that would complement Wellington Fund. Windsor Fund, a value-oriented equity fund, debuted in 1958.

In 1967, Mr. Bogle led the merger of Wellington Management Company with the Boston investment firm Thorndike, Doran, Paine & Lewis (TDPL). Seven years later, a management dispute with the principals of TDPL led Mr. Bogle to form Vanguard in September 1974 to handle the administrative functions of Wellington’s funds, while TDPL/Wellington Management would retain the investment management and distribution duties. The Vanguard Group of Investment Companies commenced operations on May 1, 1975.

The “Vanguard experiment”

To describe his new venture, Mr. Bogle coined the term “The Vanguard Experiment.” It was an experiment in which mutual funds would operate at cost and independently, with their own directors, officers, and staff—a radical change from the traditional mutual fund corporate structure, whereby an external management company ran a fund’s affairs on a for-profit basis.

“Our challenge at the time,” Mr. Bogle recalled a decade later, “was to build, out of the ashes of major corporate conflict, a new and better way of running a mutual fund complex. The Vanguard Experiment was designed to prove that mutual funds could operate independently, and do so in a manner that would directly benefit their shareholders.”

First index mutual fund in 1976

In 1976, Vanguard introduced the first index mutual fund — First Index Investment Trust — for individual investors. Ridiculed by others in the industry as “un-American” and “a sure path to mediocrity,” the fund collected a mere $11 million during its initial underwriting. Now known as Vanguard 500 Index Fund, it has grown to be one of the industry’s largest, with more than $441 billion in assets (the sister fund, Vanguard Institutional Index Fund, has $221.5 billion in assets). Today, index funds account for more than 70% of Vanguard’s $4.9 trillion in assets under management; they are offered by many other fund companies as well and they make up most exchange-traded funds (ETFs). For his pioneering of the index concept for individual investors, Mr. Bogle was often called the “father of indexing.”

1977: Direct to investors

Mr. Bogle and Vanguard again broke from industry tradition in 1977, when Vanguard ceased to market its funds through brokers and instead offered them directly to investors. The company eliminated sales charges and became a pure no-load mutual fund complex—a move that would save shareholders hundreds of millions of dollars in sales commissions. This was a theme for Mr. Bogle and his successors: Vanguard is known today for maintaining investment costs among the lowest in the industry.

A champion of the individual investor, Mr. Bogle is widely credited with helping to bring increased disclosure about mutual fund costs and performance to the public. His commitment to safeguarding investors’ interests often prompted him to speak out against practices that were common among his peers in other mutual fund organizations. “We are more than a mere industry,” he insisted in a 1987 speech before the National Investment Company Services Association. “We must hold ourselves to higher standards, standards of trust and fiduciary duty. Change we must—in our communications, our pricing structure, our product, and our promotional techniques.”

Mr. Bogle spoke frequently before industry professionals and the public. He liked to write his own speeches. He also responded personally to many of the letters written to him by Vanguard shareholders, and he wrote many reports, sometimes as long as 25 pages, to Vanguard employees — whom he called “crew members” in light of Vanguard’s nautical theme. (Mr. Bogle named the company after Admiral Horatio Nelson’s flagship at the Battle of the Nile in 1798; he thought the name “Vanguard” resonated with the themes of leadership and progress.)

In January 1996, Mr. Bogle passed the reins of Vanguard to his hand-picked successor, John J. Brennan, who joined the company in 1982 as Mr. Bogle’s assistant. The following month, Mr. Bogle underwent heart transplant surgery. A few months later, he was back in the office, writing and speaking about issues of importance to mutual fund investors. Continue Reading…