General

Keep calm and dividend on

Posted By |

By Mark Seed, myownadvisor

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

The markets are down, inflation remains hot, and interest rates are moving higher.

Are you worried?

I’m really not that worried.

I’ve been preparing for higher interest rates for years, well before the pandemic.

Case in point: this post is literally from five years ago. 

Where am I going???

Well, readers of this site will know I’m a big fan of companies that reward shareholders with dividends.

And why not love dividends?

Although I use a few indexed products in my investment portfolio, for extra diversification just in case, getting paid on a consistent, growing basis from Canadian and U.S. stocks: that’s a beautiful thing. I got another raise this week that I’ll link to below!

Digging deeper, I’m not that worried about the markets or inflation right now. There is a reason why dividends matter to me. Why do dividends really matter?

Beyond the Canadian dividend tax credit, beyond consistent payments and ever growing income I’ve experienced to date, dividends help me stick to my plan.

There is no financial advisor in my plan, nor fees paid to any advisor in my plan.

There is no day trading, there are no wasted fees or losses for trading.

There is no wild market speculation, I’m not trying to time anything.

I focus on my savings rate for investing and I invest more money when I have it. It’s that simple. 

Recall that dividends paid is real money paid from real company profits. Buying and holding an established company that has paid dividends for decades is a good sign (at least from a historical perspective) that this company had enough cashflow to reward shareholders and stay in business.

Companies that don’t pay dividends tend to use their money for other means, grow their business; make acquisitions or buy back shares, pay down risky debt, therefore driving the stock price higher over time.

These are not poor management decisions by any means: far from it. There are lots of ways shareholder value is created and to be honest, acquisitions, share buybacks and other company reinvestments could be better company decisions in the long-run!!

When it comes to the capital gains versus dividend income debate, there really isn’t a debate to be had, since every dollar you earn in capital gains from a stock is worth just as much as your dividend dollar paid. I love the graphic shown at the top of this blog.

Continue Reading…

Defined Benefit pensions lagged in third quarter but continue to withstand volatile markets and historic inflation: Mercer

Posted By |

 

Unlike the first half of 2022, the financial position of most defined benefit (DB) pension plans “decreased slightly” in the third quarter, as they were buffeted by inflation and volatile stock markets. Investment returns were mostly negative in the quarter, and yields on long-term bonds were lower at the end of the quarter than they were at the beginning, according to The Mercer Pension Health Pulse (MPHP), released on Monday.

The MPHP tracks the median solvency ratio of the DB pension plans in Mercer’s pension database, which decreased from 109% as at June 30, 2022, to 108% as at September 30, 2022.

Of the plans in Mercer’s pension database, at the end of Q3:

  • 72% of plans were estimated to be in a surplus position on a solvency basis,(vs. 73% at the end of Q2)
  • 17% of plans were estimated to have solvency ratios between 90% and 100%,(vs. 16% at the end of Q2)
  • 5% have solvency ratios between 80% and 90% (unchanged from Q2), and
  • 6% have solvency ratios less than 80%. (also unchanged from Q2).

In a press release, the Calgary-based Principal and leader of Mercer’s Wealth business, Ben Ukonga,  said that “In spite of the significant market volatility, the financial health of most DB plans would have experienced only a slight decline in the third quarter of 2022. As for what can be expected for the remainder of the year, plan sponsors should continue to expect significant volatility.”

Mercer says experts “urge caution and encourage plan sponsors to be prepared for anything, with more volatility on the horizon. Markets will most likely remain volatile in the short to medium term due to numerous risks such as the continued war in Ukraine, the upcoming US midterm elections, the potential confrontation between the US and China over the status of Taiwan, risks of a global energy supply shortfall, and of course, the ongoing inflationary environment.”

Continued short- and medium- term volatility

Markets will most likely continue to remain volatile in the short to medium term due to numerous global risks, including the war in Ukraine (and the Russian Government’s actions in response to Ukraine’s recent successes on the battlefront, such as the recent annexation of parts of Ukraine in violation of International Law, and the geo-political fallouts from these actions). Mercer is also cautious about the upcoming US mid-term elections, the increasing political gridlock and polarization in the US, and the potential for a confrontation between the US and China over the status of Taiwan. The recent volatility in the UK currency and bond markets and the risk of contagion to other markets.

Mercer also sees risks from a global energy supply shortfall, and the effect such a shortfall would have on the global economy: “… plan sponsors should pay attention to the risks associated with energy insecurity in Europe – such as the risk of the Russian Government using Russian gas supplies against Europe in retaliation to sanctions on Russia, and the effects on European economies if their energy supplies are curtailed.”

Inflation at levels not seen in 30 years

With inflation running at levels not seen in over 30 years, central banks globally are “on an aggressive monetary tightening mission in order to get inflation under control. Will they succeed without triggering a hard-landing global recession? Will higher interest rates make governments, corporations and households unable to meet the interest payments on debts they accumulated during the very long period of low interest rates? This could lead to an increase in bankruptcies and crowding out spending and investments, further exacerbating the risks of a hard landing global recession.”

As workers see a decline in the purchasing power of their wages, there will be increased pressures on employers for higher wages, Mercer says. “Sponsors of indexed DB plans will see increases in the cost of these arrangements, and sponsors of non-indexed DB plans may face pressure from their pensioner groups to provide ad hoc cost of living adjustments. Coupled with labour shortages, some employers may have no choice but to increase their labour costs. And companies that are unable to pass these increased costs to their customers will face profit margin pressures and reduced profitability, hurting their future economic outlook.”

Covid still poses macro risk

The global health landscape also poses a macro risk, Mercer says. “As the western hemisphere is entering the winter months, will a new vaccine-resistant strain of the COVID-19 virus appear? And how will governments and citizens deal with such a resurgence? Will the Chinese government continue with its zero-COVID policy? And how much of a negative impact will this policy, along with what some would call draconian lock down measures, have on the Chinese economy? And how deep will the negative knock-on effects be on China’s trading partners?” Continue Reading…

Avoid new issues but high-quality stocks likely to gain in value over next year

Posted By |

The IPO or “Initial Public Offerings” market — more commonly known as the new issues market — has gone through an extraordinarily bad time this year. It’s been bad for all three of the groups that take part in this market. They are as follows:

Investors who put their money in new issues have lost substantial sums in the past year. On average, new stock issues tend to do worse than the rest of the market in their first few years of public trading. This past year, they performed much worse than ever.

Financial institutions that bring new issues to market for sale to investors have suffered, too, because demand for new issues has dried up. At this time of year in 2021, the new issues market had raised around $100 billion. So far this year, it has raised just $5 billion. In the past quarter century, the new issues market raised an average of $33 billion at this point in the year.

Companies that raise capital for themselves through the new issues market are suffering as well. When the new issues market began drying up as a source of corporate funding, many would-be issuers of new stocks found it was harder and more expensive than ever to find alternate sources of financing.

This will be worst year for IPOs since 2009

This will be the worst year for raising money in the new issues market since 2009, when the economy was struggling to pull out of the 2008/2009 recession.

As long-time readers know, we generally advise staying out of new stock issues. After all, there’s a random element in the success or failure of every business, especially when it’s just starting out. But new issues expose you to a special risk that you avoid with stocks that have been trading publicly for some time. That is, you can only invest in new issues when they come to market.

This is just one more example of a conflict of interest, which we’ve often referred to as the worst source of risk you face as an investor.

Companies only come to the new issue market to sell their stock when it’s a good time for the company and/or its insiders to sell. The insiders can’t predict the future, of course. However, they do know much more than outsiders do about their company. Continue Reading…

Nasdaq 100: Exposure to the Modern Economy

Posted By |
Image via Pixels/Anna Nekrashevich

By Sa’ad Rana, Senior Associate – ETF Online Distribution, BMO ETFs 

(Sponsor Content)

Indexed investing, when done properly can be an efficient and low-cost way of gaining exposure to various markets. Investment vehicles such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs), make it possible for individuals to invest in these indexes, i.e., the Nasdaq-100 index.

Nasdaq-100 & Exposures

Launched in 1985, the Nasdaq-100 is one of the world’s most well-known large-cap growth indexes. The companies in the Nasdaq-100 include over 100 of the largest domestic and international non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market based on market capitalization. It is mainly comprised of technology, consumer, and health companies – with a slight exposure to industrials and telecom.

When looking at what is powering economic growth in the 21st century, we look to those new economy sectors that are highly digital. These are disproportionately tech or consumer companies like Amazon, Microsoft, and Google. This index gives you exposure to the biggest Nasdaq-listed names, along with others that follow closely behind these leaders in technology.

Nasdaq-100 vs S&P 500 Volatility & Performance

When looking at volatility, one may think of the Nasdaq as being a more growth-oriented index, and if looking at returns alone, these have certainly shown to be significant over the years. Investors may assume that the indexes’ higher performance leads to higher volatility compared to other leading indexes. However, if we take a look at the chart below, which is more of a longer-term picture, you are getting a pretty significant consistent volatility range. Of course, if you look at this year in comparison inflation has been at the forefront of headlines, growth-oriented companies have been taking a harder hit than more cash-up-front companies: you see more volatility in the Nasdaq this year vs the S&P 500.

Both the Nasdaq-100 and the S&P 500 have had very similar volatility over last 15+ years

Index returns do not reflect transactions costs or the deduction of other fees and expenses and it is not possible to invest directly in an Index. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

The big story for everyone is the performance of the Nasdaq-100 vs. the S&P 500. The long-term performance of the Nasdaq-100 shows an upward trend. If we look at post-2008, generally monetary policy had been very supportive of market growth, and companies had been able to invest in research, helping them grow over time. You see this reflected in the Nasdaq-100, where thanks to the underlying companies in this index, there is outperformance. The chart below showcases this quite well. It tells us that the Nasdaq-100 is a valuable holding in a portfolio based on performance.

Index returns do not reflect transactions costs or the deduction of other fees and expenses and it is not possible to invest directly in an Index. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Market Considerations: Performance vs Interest Rates

The chart below shows what happened the last time rates went up by a similar amount. You can see a gradual stairway up from almost 0% to about 2.5%. You can see the dip in the NDX price (grey line), which looks like a blip, almost not noticeable (but it was 23%). This isn’t very far from the drawdown this year to date. Albeit the Fed is raising rates much faster.

Based on experience, the Fed may keep rates high until inflation gets under control into that sort of two to three per cent range. The question for investors is, what happens to stocks if rates get to 3%, 4% or maybe 5% and perhaps stay at that level for a few years? This is where it is imperative to look at the amount of debt these companies have on their balance sheet, how much the interest costs will go up and what their earnings power looks like. Will they be able to remain competitive with the price of everything rising? Will consumers continue to pay for these products vs. downsizing or even substituting for cheaper alternatives? Continue Reading…

MoneySense Retired Money feature on Canada’s new “Tontine” Retirement solutions

Posted By |

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column looks at the revolutionary “Tontine” type Retire Solution announced by Guardian Capital and finance professor Moshe Milevsky earlier this month. My initial take was here on the Hub and the more in-depth MoneySense feature story can be viewed by clicking on this highlighted headline: Tontines in Canada — Moving from Theory to Practice as a solution to our Retirement Crisis.

We’ve illustrated this blog with financial projections of one of the three new Guardian Capital Retirement solutions developed in partnership with Milevsky. Some of the ideas were adapted from Milevsky’s latest book: How to Build a Modern Tontine. The theory behind this book is a driving force for Guardian Capital’s efforts to commercize these concepts and put them in the hands of retirees and would-be retirees worried about outliving their money. Nobel Laureate Economist William Sharpe has described this as “the nastiest, hardest problem in finance.”

Milvesky’s book is certainly aimed at industry practitioners and sophisticated financial advisors and investors, and contains a lot of mathematics that may beyond the reach of average investors or retirees. So rather than attempt to review it, we’ll move on to the efforts to bring these ideas to the market. What Milevsky calls “tontine thinking” is belatedly showing up in the marketplace in Canada, starting last year with Purpose Investments’ and now with three different solutions from Guardian Capital. Hub readers also can read an excerpt of the book which ran earlier Wednesday: Longevity Insurance vs Credits — a Primer.

All this has been a long time coming. MoneySense readers may recall two of my Retired Money columns about Milevsky and the future of tontines published in 2015: Part one is here and part two here. Also see my 2018 column that explains tontines in detail: Why Ottawa needs to push for tontine-like annuities.

Last June (2021), Purpose got the tontine ball rolling in Canada with its Purpose Longevity Fund. Here’s my MoneySense take on that one: Is the Longevity Pension Fund a cure for Retirement Income Worries? 

As the MoneySense feature explains, Milevsky is Guardian Capital’s Chief Retirement Architect. It sums up the original 2021 launch of Purpose Longevity Fund, and how it compares to Guardian’s three solutions.

Think of Purpose’s product as a lower-case tontine, and Guardian Capital’s as a Tontine with a capital T.

Guardian Capital’s Modern Tontine  

Guardian Capital’s September 7th press release uses the term “Modern Tontine.” There, Guardian Capital Managing Director and Head of Canadian Retail Asset Management Barry Gordon said “With our modern tontine, investors concerned about outliving their nest egg pool their assets and are entitled to their share of the pool as it winds up 20 years from now … Over that 20-year period, we seek to grow the invested capital as much as possible to maximize the longevity payout.”

 Along the way, investors who redeem early or pass away leave a portion of their assets in the pool to the benefit of surviving unitholders, boosting the rate of return. “All surviving unitholders in 20 years will participate in any growth in the tontine’s assets, generated from compound growth and the pooling of survivorship credits. This payout can be used to fund their later years of life as they see fit, and aims to ensure that investors don’t outlive their investment portfolio.” Continue Reading…