No doubt about it: at some point we’re neither semi-retired, findependent or fully retired. We’re out there in a retirement community or retirement home, and maybe for a few years near the end of this incarnation, some time to reflect on it all in a nursing home. Our Longevity & Aging category features our own unique blog posts, as well as blog feeds from Mark Venning’s ChangeRangers.com and other experts.
Billy and Akaisha enjoying Chacala Beach, Nayarit, Mexico
By Billy and Akaisha Kaderli, RetireEarlyLifestyle.com
Special to the Financial Independence Hub
It’s no secret that we have been living on around US$30,000 per year.
Now into our 31st year of financial independence we see no need to lower our spending. In fact, we are trying to increase it.
Some people do not believe we can have such a fulfilling lifestyle on this small annual amount, so in this article, we thought to explain how we do it.
Let us break this down
Decades ago we discovered the lower cost of living in Mexico. This is what is referred to as Geographic Arbitrage. You make your money in US Dollars – in our case dividends, capital gains and Social Security – and spend in the local currency. After running around the Caribbean Islands and RVing through the Western US, in 1993 we were invited to visit friends living in Chapala, Mexico. Since we track our spending daily, we saw our expenses in Dollar amounts drop rapidly by being there.
After spending 4 years in Chapala,we started traveling to Asia – another low-cost destination – again utilizing the strength of the US dollar to ease the pressure on our wallets. All the while, our stock market assets continued to increase in value.
For a handful of years again we made Dollars in the market and spent Quetzales in Panajachel, Guatemala. Easy living is what we call it and this is an essential style of our retirement approach.
In between all of these travels we spent time in our Adult Community Resort in Arizona. Surprisingly, our cost of living there was one of the best in all of the locations where we have lived. Yes, we were spending Dollars, but the price of living with value was attractive, and we modified our spending in other ways. Often, we walked or biked to grocery stores and various locations. Rarely using our vehicle at that time, the insurance company gave us a discount for having such low annual mileage. Weather – other than the super-hot summers – was pleasing and since there were tennis courts in the resort and friendly neighbors, we had assorted low-cost entertainment options.
These days we’re settled back in Mexico where the exchange rate is as good as it gets.
We have upgraded our lodging and choose more comfortable ways to get from place to place. Intra-country flights are very affordable here in Mexico, with a one-way ticket from Guadalajara to Puerto Vallarta costing less than $50USD per person. One time we flew from Guadalajara across the country to Merida for $38USD each. There is no need to stay at home when a week away is so attractively priced.
Because we have permanent residence status here in Mexico, we are entitled to an INAPAM card offering us 50% discounts on buses. Therefore, our transportation expenses for a bus trip to the beach is 2-for-the-cost-of-one. For example, we go to Chacala Beach, Nayarit, Mexico for 538Pesos for the 2 of us. This is about $13USD each on a luxury, air-conditioned bus.
This INAPAM card also gives us free entry into museums and certain public areas that charge a fee.
Rent
Our apartment, showing the upgrades we just finished
Our rent is $300USD monthly, or the Peso equivalent. This amount allows us to live in a gated garden complex, where we have a roomy one-bedroom apartment centrally located. Shopping, restaurants and doctors are easily within walking distance. There is no pressure to own a car in a foreign country with all the expenses like maintenance, licensing, fuel and insurance that are involved.
Recently we remodeled our kitchen with new counter and backsplash tile plus paint, costing 13,800 Pesos, about $690USD. Continue Reading…
Almost since the Hub’s inception in 2014, the principals behind the popular RetireEarlyLifestyle.com have provided in-depth coverage of global travel and the tips to achieve early Financial Independence they used themselves to “retire” in their early 30s.
The following email interview was between myself and Billy and Akaisha Kaderli. Our intention is to publish it on both sites. Here’s the link to their version, which ran Dec. 14th.
So without further ado:
JC Q1: Akaisha and Billy, you are about the same age as myself and my wife Ruth and apart from being American and Canadian, we appear to have several things in common: we both run sites focused on Financial Independence, have written some books on same, and continue to be working at least on our own terms even though we have achieved Findependence years ago: more than 30 in your case, seven in ours. One difference is you travel a lot more, while we are content to stay in our Toronto home near Lake Ontario and take just a few weeks abroad, preferably if it’s a business expense. So let me start with the provocative statement that I think travel is expensive and over-rated. I have no doubt you can rebut that!
A&B: First, let us clarify that the time we spend on our website is what we consider to be our volunteer time. Yes, there are products that we sell, but 99% of our information is free because we are passionate about teaching financial literacy to those who want to learn.
In regards to your comment about travel being expensive and over-rated, it depends.
We think that there are differing styles of travel. There are tourists, visitors and travelers. There is no one-right-way to journey around, and we love it that people get out and about, expanding their minds.
Tourists tend to go on vacation for a week or two, spending a good deal of money on lodging, transport, entertainment and meals. Every day must be “perfect” and if the weather doesn’t cooperate or if service is not great, then there is this sense of disappointment. They tend to go to resorts or even exotic locations, but the lodging and amenities have a sense of Disneyland unreality, and are often over-priced.
Sure, there might be a water buffalo in some rice fields, with “workers” wearing a “traditional clothing uniform” but the real locals are miles away. Tourists will pay $10 or more for a beer that the residents of the area would purchase for about a buck.
Also, Tourists might like the idea of a vacation or might not. Mostly, they like the comfort and routine of home, and a vacation is an interruption in their experience of the familiar. Many times, it borders on the feeling that “this is a waste of time. I’d rather be home.” They don’t know any local phrases in a foreign language except maybe Yes, No, Thank you, Bathroom and Beer. Tourists have more of a passive approach to their excursion and want to be entertained. Then they rate their experience with their friends when they return home.
In order to go on this vacation, they stop their mail, perhaps have a house sitter or family member/friend water their plants or watch their pet. They have probably cleaned out their refrigerator and have to stock up once again when they return home. And it all seems to be a hassle. “Would have been easier to just stay at home in the first place. Plus, now we have this credit card bill and all these souvenirs to give to friends.”
Visitors on the other hand stay in a location for a bit longer – maybe even a month or so. They know some survival phrases in the local language and choose lodging that is more middle range than a resort option. About half the time, they will eat outside of big chain restaurants with well-known names and take a chance on a local restaurant.
They are a bit more self-guided in their entertainment choices, perhaps utilizing Google maps or a local tour of the area to become familiar with their surroundings. They may select local transportation or hire a driver to go from archaeological ruins and museums or they might take a self-directed walking tour.
Using a daypack, they bring their own drinking water and perhaps some snacks to munch on as they go from place to place in their day.
Traveling for them is not necessarily a “vacation” but more of an experience, or a sabbatical. They could take cooking classes, language classes, painting courses and the like and they interact with the local people.
After their time away from home, their lives have altered in some way, perhaps expanding their perspectives or dropping an outworn routine. They look forward to their next adventure.
Then you have Travelers.
Billy and Akaisha at Chacala Beach, Nayarit, Mexico
These are the people who go from place-to-place with no itinerary other than their own style of meandering. They usually buy only one-way tickets, figuring out how to return – if they do – at another time. They communicate with the native inhabitants in their own language, purchase food, clothing and travel equipment from markets in the area and will often eat street food or dine in local restaurants.
These people travel for months, sometimes years at a time and rent apart-hotels, AirBnBs, house sit or bargain for a hotel room for a monthly rate. They may or may not have a home base for when they return from their wandering.
Travelers are more flexible mentally and are willing to have their routines interrupted. If the weather pattern is not to their liking, they might move on, or hunker down till the cold, heat, or rain stops. They do not live their traveling life as in “Today is Tuesday so it must be Belgium.” They speak with other travelers to get insight into their possible next stop.
Travelers employ digital equipment and apps to communicate with family and friends. They utilize email, sending digital photos or videos taken of their experiences, and they travel lightly. They throw their daypacks onto a bus or carry them on an affordable inter-country flight. Getting their cash in the currency of the country they are living in, they work the ATMs with a debit card that pays the withdrawal fee back.
They manage their lives online and have been receiving paperless mail for a long time. Photos are placed up in the cloud and they take care of business via Skype, WhatsApp or Signal, benefitting from medical tourism for their health care.
Travel does not cost them “more.” In fact, if they were spending their time “at home” they would still have a baseline of expenses – lodging, food, transport, entertainment for instance. But now they have incorporated these same expenses along with globe-trotting which creates memories for a lifetime and stories to share.
In general, travel has broadened their minds, giving them a unique perspective of the world and a confidence and self-reliance that pervades daily living.
We think it’s important to know one’s traveling style and enjoy who you are. There is not a one-size-fits-all, and we recognize that travel isn’t for everyone.
Someone has to stay home, attend the roses and mow the lawn!
Hub CFO Jonathan Chevreau
How does extensive travel differ from short vacations from full-time employment?
JC Q2: To clarify, we enjoy travel too; was just playing devil’s advocate. Before we switch to Findependence, do you think there’s a big difference between the expensive two-week vacations many salaried employees take, and actually renting a house or suite abroad for 3 or 4 months at a time in Semi-retirement?
A&B: Yes, there is a big difference, actually.
When one is still working, vacations are stress busters. Work hard, play hard.
These holidays tend to be results of pent up demand for luxury; things we have denied ourselves during our working life like splurging on fine meals out, visiting an exotic place far from home, a ski vacation, or a safari. Continue Reading…
While most business executives are and should be approaching Financial Independence, there is a little-known threat to their financial well-being: addiction/substance abuse.
In fact, according to the SAMHSA [Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration], around 11.4% of management employees (example business executives and managers) are diagnosed with a Substance Use Disorder every year.
If the addiction is not managed in a timely fashion, abrupt dismissal could torpedo any long-term goals for financial freedom.
As an aspiring business executive or someone who is serious about their financial education, it’s good to be aware of addiction and its possible ramifications.
So in this post, we look at why business execs should take addictions seriously. We also discuss different treatment options available for business executives to overcome SUD.
Help is Available
Anyone can suffer from drug addiction, including those in white-collar, executive positions who juggle a lot of responsibilities. In fact, it could be more difficult for them as they may be tempted to avoid/delay treatment so their career or work doesn’t suffer due to the required time off.
That’s where executive addiction-related treatment centers come in. These treatment centers are equipped with high-end tools, services, and necessary amenities so that patients can maintain active personal and professional lives while also achieving sobriety.
Often the main highlight of these programs is the luxury setting and amenities given to the professionals and a distraction-free comfortable environment.
Addiction Treatments available for Business Executives
Medical Detox
Often the first phase of most recovery programs; medical detox aims at the cessation of drug usage. In the absence of medical aid, the patient may experience myriad unpleasant withdrawal symptoms.
Executive treatment facilities, such as detox centers in California, deploy safe and medical procedures to make the detox process as comfortable and less painful as possible.
Psychotherapy
Often the therapeutic phase of the program begins right after the detox is successfully over. Inpatient rehab centers in Los Angeles for example, use it in individual and group settings. Psychotherapy mainly aims to recognize the psychological reasons that are causing or triggering the drug usage.
After that, it teaches several relapse prevention mechanisms and coping techniques to deal with tough situations without resorting to drugs. Continue Reading…
On Friday, the Hub republished the first part of a two-part Question-and-Answer session between finance professor and author Dr. Moshe Milevsky and Gordon Wiebe of The Capital Partner [TCP]. This is the second and final instalment:
TCP: I wanted to turn to your Book, Longevity Insurance for a Biological Age. Your thesis is that we should be looking at our biological age and using that to calculate and project our income and how much we should be drawing from our savings.
M.M. And, more importantly than that, making decisions in our personal finances, right?
You know, somebody is trying to figure out at what age they should take C.P.P. Should I take it at 60? 65? 70?I don’t think they should use their chronological age to do that.
Trying to figure out when to retire? Stop using your chronological age.
I mean there’s a whole host of decisions that you have to make based on age and I’m saying we’re using the wrong age metric. It should be based on your biological age.
Now, at this point, biological age sounds like this funny number that comes out of some website, but sooner or later we’ll all have it. And, it’s going to be faster than you think. Your watch will tell you your biological age. And, then in a couple of years, people will stop associating themselves with their chronological age.
They will just stop using it.
And you’re going to sit down with your antiquated compliance driven forms that say, “I need to know my client’s age. Oh, you’re 62.”
And, the client says, “Ha, ha. That’s chronological age. We don’t use that anymore, buddy. I use biological age. Sixty-two, that’s not my age.”
It’s about preparing people for the world in which age is not the number of times we circle the sun.
TCP: What metrics do you think we’ll lean towards to measure biological age? Telemeres? Others?
M.M. There’s a whole bunch of bio-markers that can be used. Some people use telomeres or something called “DNA methylation” or epigenetic clocks. There are about fifty of them, but eventually they’ll all coalesce into a number called “biological age.”
There will be a consensus on how to measure it and you’ll go to your doctor and your doctor will say, “your chronological age is 50, but your biological age is 62.” You’re doing something wrong.
Then a financial advisor will use that information differently when you build a retirement plan.
TCP: That makes sense, but trying to achieve a consensus and getting everyone to use the same metrics from a compliance standpoint or trying to get pension plans and policy makers to agree would be a challenge, wouldn’t it?
MM: It would be. In fact, that’s exactly where I’m headed now. I’m giving a speech in Madrid and that’s exactly what regulators from a number of different countries want me to talk about.
They want to know, “is this feasible? We want to implement this in our pension system. We don’t want wealthy people retiring at the age of 65, they’re going to live forever and bankrupt our system. We want people to retire at a biological age.”
TCP: Let’s talk about that a little more. Advisors typically use a 4% draw on savings as a benchmark withdrawal rate. But, if we use our biological age, there would then be a range. I assume somewhere between 3-6%?
Adjusting the 4% Rule
M.M. You’re absolutely right. That’s where I would go with this. You have to use your biological age and the 4% rule has to be adjusted.
But, what I’m saying is more than that. That rule has to change. It’s not just about the number or percentage. It’s how the rule is applied.
I really don’t like the idea of fixing a spending rate today and sticking to it for the rest of your life no matter what happens. Your spending rate has to be adaptable.
What you have to tell people is, “look, this year we can pull out 6.2%. Next year, it really depends on how markets behave. If markets go down, we may have to cut back. If markets go up, we can give you a bit more.”
I think the 4 per cent rule is really what I call a one-dimensional rule. It’s not that four is one dimensional. Any one number is one dimensional: just telling them a per cent.
It’s got to be at least two dimensional. Meaning, this is what it is now, but next year if this is what happens we’ll do that. ..
Three dimensional is to go beyond that is to go beyond that and say let’s take a look at what other income and assets you have.
“Oh! You’ve got a lot more income from guaranteed sources, you can afford more than four per cent, this year.”
TCP: It’s a dynamic scenario, a moving target.
M.M. That’s the key word, dynamic versus static.
The threat of rising Interest Rates
TCP: Canadian investors currently have over two trillion invested in mutual funds. Over half is invested in balanced funds or fixed income and we’re in a horrible position where fixed income is concerned. We’ve had declining rates for the past forty years. At best, bonds will stay flat. At worst, bonds could lose up to thirty per cent of their value.
You talk about the importance of the sequence of returns and how that affects income potential. Have you or your students run scenarios with higher interest rates and the impact it could possibly have?
M.M. I haven’t thought about it beyond what you’re noting. The obvious scenario is as interest rates move up, these things are going to take a big hit.
And, retirees who feel they’ve been playing it safe by putting funds in bonds will suddenly realize there’s nothing safe about bonds in a rising interest rate environment.
I think they’re confusing liquidity and safety with interest rate risk. It’s liquid and its safe. Government is not going to default but boy, can it lose its value.
We’ve become accustomed to this declining pattern. Anybody who is younger than forty doesn’t even understand what higher interest rates means. It’s never happened in their lifetime. They don’t believe it. Understand it. Never felt it. You show them graphs going back to the 1970s. That’s not how to convince them. They’re empiricists. They’ve never lived it themselves, they don’t believe you. Continue Reading…
Professor Moshe Milevsky wants us to re-think the metrics we use for retirement calculations. Instead of basing retirement income amounts on our age i.e., the number of orbits around the sun, Dr. Milevsky suggests we consider using our biological age. What is your biological age?
Advances in science suggest our biological age is based on our actual physical shape or our personal physiology. Rock stars like Sting, Phil Collins and Ace Frehley were born in 1951. Their legal age is 70, but their actual condition may be substantially different from Mark Hamill (Luke Skywalker) or Dr. Jill Biden (U.S. First Lady) who also turned 70 in 2021.
The cumulative effects of genes, lifetime dietary habits, exercise, social conditions and stress levels for instance, could lengthen or decrease life expectancy and therefore provide a better indication of future retirement income needs. Recent scientific advances are helping make this information more available to seniors, advisors, researchers and policy advisors.
Background
TCP: From where does your passion for mathematics originate?
M.M. I guess it comes from my life as an undergrad. I was taking various courses including one on English literature and essay writing. I handed in an essay and received a bad grade. The professor said, “You really can’t write to save your life, you might want go into math.”
I did and I got an undergraduate degree in mathematical physics. Then, I went to graduate school and studied math and statistics, but I was really interested in gravitational physics. That was my thing, like how a golf ball moves after a drive, the arc that it makes, etc.
My thesis supervisor said, “Moshe, you’ll never find a job with that kind of specialty. You might want to go to business school.” So, I moved into business and finance and it’s where I’ve been for the past 25 years.
TCP: You also have a passion for financial history. Is there a period in history that strikes you as particularly innovative or ingenious?
M.M. There is. I’m interested in the 17th century, specifically 17th century Europe and the evolution of financial products, instruments, and economics.
Anything from the crowning of James II in 1685 until the ascension of George II in the mid-18th century.
TCP: I’m not that familiar with that era. Does it line up with the advances in math, probability, and statistics?
M.M. It does. There was this interesting alignment of people interested in mathematics and statistics and they developed the basics of probability theory, economics, and finance. It was an alignment of interests that led to many of the instruments we use today.
You know, nobody would say that 1690 was the origin of the i-Pad or the i-Phone or the laptop. But, many of the financial instruments we use, whether it’s pensions, annuities, stocks, bonds, mutual funds, they all kind of originated in the late 17th century. You can almost trace back a direct line. I’m fascinated by that. It interests me and I’ve spent a lot of time looking at history from that period.
TCP: Among other things, the pandemic has shown how segments of the population struggle with basic math principles. Are you surprised by the lack of financial literacy?
M.M. It is a problem the pandemic has brought home. I think it’s a problem that finance has brought home. A lot of people are incapable of mathematical reasoning and that’s not healthy in today’s very quantitative, data driven environment.
Thousands of years ago, you had to make sure to out run the dinosaurs and get home in time for dinner. What did your brain have to do? Nobody was asking you to solve calculus problems.
Now, we have to evolve to deal with these very quantitative issues and make decisions and I think the pandemic has brought that home very starkly. There’s some completely irrational decision making because of a misinterpretation of probabilities and the odds. Just look at Toronto.
There are 300 infections, and everybody is walking around like it’s Ebola and every other person has it. In some sense, you have to step back and say, “Wait a minute. What are the probabilities? Do you understand all of the things you’re sacrificing?” It’s all probabilities. Those things all come down to mathematical reasoning.
I do think the educational system should focus more on some of these statistical, data driven issues. I think financial literacy is an absolute must.
My bread and butter is teaching undergraduate students at the university. Undergraduate Personal Finance. That’s a course I’ve been teaching now for almost twenty years.
It’s basic personal finance. You know. What’s a tax return? What’s an insurance policy? How does a mortgage work? What’s an RRSP?
Why do I have to teach this to 22-year-olds? Why don’t they know this from high school? Why isn’t this covered before I see them? And, why are only the ones that I teach in Business School getting this? What about the rest of the students who are studying something else? Why is this not considered a national emergency? People are wandering into the world without the requisite tools.
TCP: Carrying credit card balances in perpetuity, putting 5% down on million-dollar homes …
M.M. Let alone, just verify that what they’re paying is correct, right? Nobody’s able to do that because it’s all coming from calculations that are being done by algorithms that nobody wants to or even knows how to verify. So, there are a number of things that worry me.
The Mathematics of Retirement Income
TCP: I haven’t had a chance to watch the movie “The Baby Boomer Dilemma,” yet. I’ve just seen the trailer.
M.M. Yes, that’s an interesting one. I’m not sure how I got dragged into that, but I now have an IMDb movie rating. I am now officially a Hollywood actor (chuckling). Go figure.
TCP: On the trailer you say, “what’s been happening over the last few years is our accounts have been growing. It looks like we are getting wealthier. But, the income that we can get from that sum of money is shrinking.” What did you mean by that? Continue Reading…
Posted By 
Posted By 
