Building Wealth

For the first 30 or so years of working, saving and investing, you’ll be first in the mode of getting out of the hole (paying down debt), and then building your net worth (that’s wealth accumulation.). But don’t forget, wealth accumulation isn’t the ultimate goal. Decumulation is! (a separate category here at the Hub).

Bond ETF discounts during recent periods of Volatility

Posted By |
Rich Powers, Vanguard head of ETF product management

By Rich Powers and Scott Johnston, Vanguard Americas

(Sponsor Content)

The waves of volatility from the coronavirus outbreak have reached every corner of the financial markets. For bond ETFs, the waves have resulted in both volatile market price swings and larger-than-usual gaps between market prices and net asset values (NAVs).

When the gap is positive (that is, when the market price is greater than the NAV), it’s called a premium. A discount occurs when the NAV is greater than the market price. While such gaps can be unsettling, history shows that premiums or discounts are always present with bond ETFs, and their widening amid market volatility tends to be short-lived.

Bond ETFs are an important source of liquidity

Along with heightened market volatility in the bond market over the last few weeks, there’s been a drop in liquidity of many types of individual bonds: that is, the willingness of market participants to buy and sell. Bond ETFs, on the other hand, have maintained their liquidity and have been the primary mechanism for price discovery in the fixed income markets.

In such a volatile environment, bond ETFs can be expected to trade at discounts or premiums. Though discounts and premiums of this breadth and magnitude are rare, bond ETFs have been tested during prior bouts of volatility and actually do a good job of reflecting in real time the value of the underlying fixed income securities. In times of volatility with rapidly evolving macroeconomic, interest rate, and credit environments, investors should expect premiums or discounts in bond ETFs. Bond ETFs tracking similar benchmarks have experienced large variations in market returns as well.

Fewer inputs can create greater price disparities

Discounts and performance differences reflect the fact that there are two ways to determine portfolio values. In setting end-of-day NAVs, ETF pricing specialists use both actual trades and an adjustment factor based on bid/ask spreads for bonds, especially for bonds that haven’t traded recently. Market prices, in contrast, are collectively determined by ETF investors and “market-makers.” If, as happened in the second last week of March, bond trading is fairly diminished in the underlying market, NAV calculations will have fewer inputs and thus there’s an increased chance for differences from market prices.

Unlike a NAV that’s calculated by a pricing provider, market prices for bond ETFs reflect the market’s minute-by-minute judgment, which includes factors such as:

  • Valuation estimates of the underlying holdings by market-makers.
  • Supply and demand for the ETFs.
  • The cost for providing liquidity in fast-moving markets where underlying bonds may have less liquidity.

Since these calculations have different inputs, investors should expect different outcomes, particularly in volatile markets. When viewed over longer periods — say a month or a quarter — these short-term disparities are generally imperceptible, as they are over a “normal” day or week. Continue Reading…

7 timeless strategies investors need to remember in this time of market turmoil

Posted By |

The world as we knew it suddenly changed. What a surprise beyond belief for all of us.

There was no announcement six months ago. There was no new or updated playbook for any of this upheaval.

A harsh pandemic is a sure way of turning lives upside down. Treacherous times are firmly entrenched as the new roadway.

Stock and bond markets march at will in both directions. Investors wonder whether they are closer to a market bottom or to a top. All sorts of fears and worries are sprouting everywhere.

This is a reminder for all to go slow: younger and older, novices and seasoned. Try your utmost to use all the investing common sense you can muster. Sitting on your hands is often a worthy move.

My strategies:

Accordingly, I have selected seven timeless strategies that every investor ought to be familiar with in detail. They form a solid foundation for guiding the family nest egg.

I’ve kept them brief and to the point for the sake of simplicity. Here is my summary of critical strategies:

1). Short term trading is best suited for your “speculative” money. Conversely, long term investing is the best fit for your “serious” money, such as funding retirement. These two portfolios are constructed differently, so don’t mix them.

2). Chasing returns has been far from a consistent winner. Instead, pay attention to acquiring broadly diversified “quality” investments. These portfolios typically fare better during bouts of market turmoil.

3). Set aside the could’ve, should’ve and would’ve schools of hindsight. Make your decisions based on available information and move forward. Looking back in your rear view only creates distractions you can’t do anything about.

4). Becoming attached to your stocks is akin to making emotional decisions. Instead, I recommend pursuing logical moves designed to embrace your best interests. Your investing success should improve.

5). Don’t make investment decision out of fears. Rather, wait until the coast begins to clear. You have absolutely no control over what happens to market fears.

6). Decide whether you seek the return “of” your money, or the return “on” your money. That strategy sheds light on the fit of your desired portfolio. It also keeps you better invested within a more comfortable asset mix.

7). Investing your money all at once is usually not a preferred strategy. Studies show that asset mix delivers the biggest impact on portfolio outcomes. Neither superior stock selection, nor timing of purchases are close seconds.

My premise:

My premise is that investing strategy need not be complicated. I recommend that the main ingredient is always plenty of patience combined with common sense. Focus on logical and sensible approaches that contribute to your discipline. Continue Reading…

Aman Raina’s 5-year Robo advisor review — and how Robos are holding up in the bear market

Posted By |

By Aman Raina, SageInvestors.ca

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

NOTE: This review was initially undertaken using data compiled as of January 30, 2020, which marked the 5-year anniversary during which the portfolio was active but prior to the severe market turbulence that occurred in February and March 2020.  As it became apparent that the market pullback was becoming an epic meltdown, additional data was compiled and included into the review.

Five years ago I embarked on a personal experiment. I was having a hard time getting any insights on the effectiveness of a new investment services that was shaking the ground at the time in 2015.

Known or labeled as Robo Advisors, these new wealth management companies offered services to invest on behalf of others using an online platform and a combination of algorithms and computer coding to buy and sell specific investments and manage portfolios. Five years ago these firms were just stepping into the investing consciousness, but since then they have mushroomed and even traditional investment companies are now offering some flavor of online investment management services.

It all seemed quite appealing; however, there was one thing that many marketing materials, blogs, and mainstream media were avoiding … do these types of services make money for investors? Is this the type of service that would successfully bring more people, who naturally feel intimidated and frustrated by the whole investing concept into the investing domain?

Since no robo advisor company back then was interested in disclosing their performance (they still avoid it) other than citing research that their low cost/passive oriented strategy is superior, I decided five years ago to try an experiment to get some more insights that did not involve boilerplate marketing speak. I set up an account with one of the “large” Robo Adviser firms and invested $5000 of my own money into it.

My goal was to go through the process and blog about my experience using the service, how the ROBO went about making decisions and how it managed my portfolio, and more importantly, the results. I’ve always said that we need a good five years to really get a handle on how effective these services are compared to traditional wealth management services. Well, I just crossed the five-year mark of my ROBO journey, so let’s check back in and take a look at how it’s been doing. I’ve also said that I would reserve my opinions about this service until we reached that five-year threshold. Well here we are and I’m ready to unload my takes.

 

2019 was an epic year for stocks. US major stock indexes were up just over 30 per cent on the year. Fantastic returns. Hopefully my ROBO got a good piece of that action.

Performance

Overall, my ROBO portfolio posted a solid year. The portfolio was up 11.6 per cent year over year, a nice rebound from the previous year where it lost 2.1 per cent. Over the 5 years, the portfolio generated positive returns in three of the 5 years, and posted double-digit returns in those three years. The portfolio increased by $707, of which $162 came from dividend income while the remaining $545 came from capital gains. Over the year period, the ROBO portfolio increased from my initial $5000 to $6817, a cumulative return of 36 per cent. Of the $1817 increase, 1/3 was from dividends while the remainders was from capital gains. The portfolio continued to benefit from higher concentration of US and Canadian equities, which again hit it out of the park the past year.

ROBO Annual Return Chart.jpg
ROBO Cap Gain vs Dividend Chart.jpg

Below is the breakdown of the portfolio. Five years ago when I set up the account I answered a series of questions about my financial literacy and risk tolerance. ROBO took my responses and crafted a portfolio that it felt was compatible with my profile. Continue Reading…

My FP Down to Business podcast on the Crash of 2020 and how to deal with it

Posted By |

The Financial Post has just published a podcast about the market impact of coronavirus, via a conversation between me and FP transportation reporter Emily Jackson, host of the weekly podcast Down to Business. You can find the full 19-minute interview by clicking the highlighted text: How Coronavirus market chaos compares to 2008. 

While I have been posting almost daily commentaries on the crisis right here on the Hub from various experts, thus far I have refrained from comment myself, but the podcast pretty much covers my views. One thing that came out of the interview was that there may be big generational differences in how this market crash is viewed.

For baby boomers who are retired or thought they were close to it (read “me!”) this crash has been a traumatic experience, especially for those who didn’t pay much attention to risk management and appropriate asset allocation. At our age (I’ll be 67 in a few weeks), we presumably have finished accumulating our nest egg and our time horizon to recoup any losses is shrunken: young people are in quite a different situation: they have less money to lose and have several decades to get it back.

Worried retirees should be at least 50% in fixed income by now

Fortunately, we have been quite conservative: my own advisor has long counselled being somewhere between 50 and 60% fixed income and — having been reminded of the downside risk of the market yet again — I have been selling a few winners where we can find them with the goal of getting our total cash and fixed income to about two thirds of our total portfolio.

We took some profits as the 11-year bull market raged, although of course hardly enough to dodge the storm entirely.  As with most investors, Covid-19 was a “Black swan” that seemingly came out of the blue. I guess I was lulled into believing that the US president would keep the markets aloft at least until he was re-elected, by leaning on the Federal Reserve chairman and various other levers he possesses. Fooled us again, Donald!

Some readers and at least one advisor I correspond with probably think 67% fixed income is too conservative, but that’s right in line with the conservative rule of thumb that fixed income should equal your age. That leaves about a third in (mostly) non-registered stocks, although we also hold US dividend paying stocks in our RRSPs, along with fixed income (bond ETFs and laddered strips of GICs). Our selling inside our RRSP has been more along the lines of selling half of big winners and “playing with the house’s money,” a phrase our daughter has happily adopted too.

Emily Jackson, host of Down to Business; BusinessFinancialPost.com

On the other hand, as I remarked to Emily, it’s much less of a disaster for younger people: in fact, I’d argue it’s almost good news, financially speaking (not of course from a health perspective). Finally, younger investors have an opportunity to buy stocks and equity ETFs at reasonable prices, and at the same time as interest rates fall, they are getting a break — or soon will — on variable-rate mortgages.

Certainly if I were 20 years younger I’d be itching to buy at current prices, although even then I’d keep some powder dry just in case the bargains become even more tempting.

How bad could this get? In yesterday’s FP, David Rosenberg frankly raised the spectre of a depression and total losses in the Canadian market of 50% or more. See It’s time for investors to start saying the D-word — this economic damage could be double 2008.

Too late to ‘revaluate’ your risk tolerance?

A blog the Hub republished on the weekend from Michael James on Money suggested that now is not the time to reassess your risk tolerance. See It’s too late to ‘revaluate’ your risk tolerance. That blog generated a fair bit of discussion on Twitter. Again, this could fall along generational lines. If you believe markets are only half way down and you want some cash to deploy to scoop up bargains at the bottom, then you can sell down some non-registered winners and losers, ideally in equal proportions to make it net tax neutral. Massive up days like Tuesday are an opportunity to do that. Continue Reading…

Americans extremely worried about job security, finances and Retirement due to Coronavirus

Posted By |

By Mike Brown

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Due to COVID-19, 57% of adult Americans are worried about their job security, while 63% are concerned about both their retirement savings and ability to make monthly student loan payments. Plus, many other insights from LendEDU’s newest survey.

At the time of this writing, Johns Hopkins’ Coronavirus Resource Center has reported 353,692 cases of Coronavirus around the world and 15,430 deaths. In the United States, there have been 35,345, while the total number of deaths is 473 by most estimates.

Then there’s the economic fallout in the U.S. as the stock market has gone into a tailspin, and a recession, or worse, seems likely. With the nation necessarily self-quarantining itself, countless small businesses are shuddering their doors and laying people off.

In the wake of this global pandemic, LendEDU has surveyed 1,000 adult Americans to better gauge the micro-level economic impact that COVID-19 will have on our country.

We found that a substantial proportion of people are worried about their job security, retirement savings, mortgage or student loan payments, and taking on too much credit card debt.

Click here to jump to the full survey results

If you would like to see a specific breakdown of the data other than those provided (ex. state-by-state, gender, age), please email me at brown@lendedu.com.

Observations & Analysis: How is Coronavirus Impacting the Finances & Employment of Americans?

All data is based on a survey of 1,000 adult Americans commissioned by LendEDU and conducted by research firm Pollfish. The survey was conducted on March 18, 2020. For some questions, the answer percentages may not add up to 100% exactly due to rounding.

Job Security

We first asked respondents how Coronavirus has already impacted their job since the virus’ impacts started being felt by the U.S.

35% of adult Americans have been fortunate enough to see no changes to their job due to COVID-19, while a combined 24% have not lost their job, but have seen their hours either reduced or eliminated. Unfortunately, 6% of respondents have lost their job in the Coronavirus fallout.

But, just because the majority of respondents have kept their job in some manner does not mean they aren’t still concerned about losing it. This rings especially true amongst those who have seen hour reductions.

Amongst those that maintained their job in some manner, the majority, 57%, were still concerned about job security moving forward as the impact of Coronavirus widens.

67% of those who have seen reduced hours are worried about keeping their job, while 73% of respondents who had their hours completely cut but kept their job are concerned over job security.

Compare these numbers to the 48% of those who have seen no change in their job, but are still worried about their losing it.

No matter the position employees find themselves in as COVID-19 takes hold, it is clear that stressing over job security will almost be impossible to avoid during this time. Maintaining morale will be a challenge for employees, employers, and the economy as a whole.

General Finances

Before Coronavirus and its impacts hit home here in the U.S., how many Americans were living paycheck to paycheck?

No matter how the data is broken down, the majority of respondents were living paycheck to paycheck before COVID-19 became a large-scale issue in the U.S. This has been reported in other studies as well.

So, while the Coronavirus outbreak in the U.S. may not drastically change the financial lives of those who have seen no changes to their jobs, it could cause severe trouble for those who have seen reduced hours or lost their jobs completely.

For example, 70% of those who have seen their hours partially cut due to COVID-19 were already living paycheck to paycheck, while 82% who have lost their jobs because of the pandemic were doing the same.

Over the next few weeks or even months, these folks will be stretched thin like never before when it comes to their finances. This is why a plan to send Americans checks due to COVID-19 is being discussed in Washington D.C.

With financial woes forthcoming or already here for many Americans, some will be drawing from an emergency fund or savings account to cover expenses.

And when it came to the expenses that Coronavirus has brought on, whether it be toilet paper or T-bone steaks, we found that our respondents have spent an average of $335.65 on COVID-19-related expenses since the pandemic began to seriously impact the U.S.

When expenses run high, many consumers need to access debt, typically via credit card, to finance their purchases. We asked poll participants with at least one credit card if they will be taking on more credit card debt than they would like due to Coronavirus.

Retirement Savings

Coronavirus has already had a crippling impact on the stock market, and it’s likely to get worse. For older Americans especially, there’s a pervasive fear that retirement nest eggs might get completely decimated as a result.

38% of our respondents indicated they are currently saving for retirement through something like a 401(k), Roth IRA, or high-yield savings account. We asked these folks about their concerns over their retirement savings due to COVID-19.

Within each age breakdown, the majority of Americans indicated that they are worried about their retirement savings due to COVID-19 and the ramifications it will have on the market.

Not surprisingly, this is especially true for older Americans ages 55 and up who are in the retirement red zone. 67% of this cohort are concerned about their retirement nest eggs.

Monthly Finance Payments (Mortgages, Student Loans, & Credit Cards)

With financial worries widespread and budgets tightening, we wanted to ask a few questions related to common financial obligations that Americans have, like payments for student loans, credit cards, or a mortgage.

The following graphics are based on questions only asked to those respondents that stated they had a mortgage (35%), outstanding student loan debt (23%), and/or at least one open credit card account (63%).

Many respondents are quite concerned about meeting their monthly financial obligations, whether they be related to a mortgage, student loans, credit cards, or all three.

Most alarming was how those adult Americans that lost their jobs due to Coronavirus answered these few questions. 96% of this group was worried about meeting mortgage payments, 88% about student loan payments, and 93% about credit card payments.

Widespread delinquency or default would have severe implications on the economy at large. In an attempt to combat this, we have seen the Trump Administration waive further accruing interest on student loans and suspend all evictions and foreclosures until April for FHA-insured mortgages.

Investments

While we did touch on investments as they pertained to retirement savings earlier, we wanted to dedicate a section to more active, personal investments that consumers make through personal brokerage accounts.

To describe the stock market in the last couple of weeks as turbulent would be an understatement. There have been sharp rises and drops (mostly the latter), and trading has actually been halted a few times in recent weeks on both the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq. The 15-minute halts happen when an initial steep drop in the market triggers “circuit breakers” that shut down trading.

27% of our poll participants indicated that they were actively invested in the market through a personal brokerage account when COVID-19 started impacting the U.S.

We asked this group a couple of questions in regards to playing the market.

As expected, the vast majority of Americans who were making personal investments in the market when Coronavirus escalated got clobbered. 79% of respondents indicated they lost money, while just 8% made a profit.

And, how will these respondents invest moving forward as the pandemic continues to disrupt daily life?

As it turns out, the majority of investors plan on riding out the storm and holding steady on their stock plays. Meanwhile, 21% plan on buying more during this crisis, while 13% will be looking to dump shares.

Full Survey Results

Continue Reading…