Building Wealth

For the first 30 or so years of working, saving and investing, you’ll be first in the mode of getting out of the hole (paying down debt), and then building your net worth (that’s wealth accumulation.). But don’t forget, wealth accumulation isn’t the ultimate goal. Decumulation is! (a separate category here at the Hub).

Get ready for POS3 and CRM2 deadlines

Photo.Anthony Boright
Anthony Boright

By Anthony A. Boright

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

In my last guest posting for the Financial Independence Hub I talked about the financial services industry going digital even though there are some growing pains.

I also mentioned the coming May 30 Point of Sale Stage 3 (POS3) regulatory deadline for pre-sale delivery of disclosure documents to mutual fund investors. On that day, dealers and advisors will have to send investors Fund Facts disclosure documents before the investor decides to buy a fund. Until May 30, dealers and advisors still will be able to abide by the previous industry regulation (i.e. POS Stage 2), which gave them two days to provide the Fund Facts document to their clients after the mutual fund purchase. Not so beginning May 30.

Stage 1 was four-pager in 2011

This is part of the industry satisfying the call by regulators to move ahead with POS (Point of Sale) delivery requirements for Fund Facts. Stage 1 of the POS regulation was introduced in 2011 with the creation of the short, four-page Fund Facts document that was in plain English and easily understood. It has since replaced the lengthy, jargon-filled legal prospectus document.

The introduction of Fund Facts at or prior to the Point of Sale means an electronic transaction will take place in most disclosure cases. After all, electronic is instantaneous. We first launched our Fund Facts delivery solution, www.investorpos.com, in 2011. Since then approximately 96% of these transactions have been electronic while only 4% have been going through our printed mail stream.

The document repository contains the universe of most recently filed Fund Facts documents from every mutual fund and ETF manager in Canada, so dealers and their advisors can access these disclosure documents from a single source. These new regulations will result in cost savings for the industry that can be passed on to investors. One of our bank clients requested and received a regulatory exception, and implemented our POS solution well in advance of the regulation date because they could see the cost advantage – both for them and their clients.

CRM2 deadline is July 15

Another date to watch is the CRM (Client Relationship Model) 2 deadline of July 15. The idea behind CRM2 is to provide investors with clear information about the securities fees and commissions they are paying. The idea behind this is to make investment dealers, brokers and portfolio managers more accountable.

In a nutshell, CRM2 means all dealers must provide statements with detailed information about what fees are being charged to the client in actual dollar amounts. This will also include sales incentives and embedded fees. No longer will statements present fees as a simple percentage. Now customers will know exactly how much they are paying for the service, and also how those investments are performing.

There is definitely growing support around the world to eliminate embedded commissions from mutual funds; this has already happened in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. Likewise, there is no doubt that the move to greater disclosure, transparency and focus on the overall cost of investments will only increase in future. The financial crisis of 2008 was the catalyst behind this, and recent market softness has renewed the commitment of those who are intent on educating investors about their portfolios.

Some people may be in for a surprise when they learn they haven’t been paying 1% or 2% as they had thought, and may turn to low-cost discount brokers or ETFs. On the other hand, they may see the value, and feel more comfortable knowing exactly how and what their advisor makes, and in that sense this could improve the advisor-client relationship.

Industry will be more accountable to its customers

Either way, the purpose behind CRM2 and POS3 is to make the industry more accountable to its clientele, and to make that clientele more knowledgeable about their own investments. However, while CRM2 hangs on the July 15 deadline, investors’ statements may continue to appear just as they have for some time yet. Dealers will have up to one year from that date before they have to send investment performance and compensation reports. Thus, most people will likely not receive this data until the first quarter of next year.

The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) says these changes bring Canada in line with regulatory standards around the world. And having an easy-to-understand breakdown of fees with CRM2 only leads to a better informed and better educated investor.

Anthony Boright is President and co-founder of InvestorCOM (www.investorcom.com), which leverages technology to address the evolving regulatory disclosure and communications needs of the financial services industry. InvestorCOM helps its clients create and distribute their communications online, as well as through traditional print/mail channels. Clients include banks, asset managers, life insurance companies, large and small IIROC (Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada), and MFDA (Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada) dealers and advisors serving investors.

SPIVA Scorecard: Canada comeback?

graham-bodel
Graham Bodel

By Graham Bodel, Chalten Advisors

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

“Not to fear, we have found a manager based in our very own Canada that is able to consistently beat the pack.”

Standard & Poor’s has done a brilliant job over the last few years of shining the light on the fund management industry by publishing its SPIVA (S&P Indices Versus Active Funds) Scorecards,  which report on the performance of actively managed mutual funds relative to their benchmark indices.

We’re not spoiling anything by telling you the results don’t usually come out favourably for active managers:  the performance data has been fairly consistent and compelling for years.

The latest SPIVA Canada Scorecard for the year ended December 31, 2015 came out on Monday and at first glance there may be reason to cheer, especially for those fund managers focused on domestic stocks.

SPIVA Canada Scorecard 2

While 57% might not seem very convincing, it’s certainly a better result than US domestic equity managers, only 25% of whom managed to beat the benchmark last year (Source: SPIVA US Scorecard).

Of course, 2015 was a year where the Canadian stock market performed worse than any other developed market globally in USD terms and was only able to squeak past Russia and Brazil.   If you’d been one of the few lucky Canadians to properly diversify outside of Canada last year, you would have been disappointed with active fund management as only 21% of Canadian funds managing International Equities (outside North America) were able to outperform their benchmark.

The longer the time period, the worse the results

Continue Reading…

Advisors now more likely to recommend ETFs for clients than mutual funds

davenadiq
Dave Nadig

Here’s my latest MoneySense blog, which recaps the two-day  Exchange Traded Forum 2016 in Toronto this week.

You can find the full blog by clicking on this headline: Are ETFs beating out mutual funds in popularity?

Pictured to the left is Dave Nadig, ETF director for FactSet Research Systems Inc. of Norwalk, CT,  who in his keynote address said that since the financial crisis,  net mutual fund inflows were US$61 billion, compared to a whopping US$1.2 trillion for ETFs.

Hockey stick curve

Continue Reading…

Corporate class mutual fund structure still strong despite changes in Budget

Som-Headshot
Som Seif

By Som Seif,  Purpose Investments

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

As many of you have already heard, in its most recent budget, the federal government announced plans to alter the structure of the corporate class model.

Starting in September, switching between corporate class series funds will become a taxable event: just like that of a traditional mutual fund trust.

While this decision will affect retail investors’ ability to compound wealth over the long term and will likely result in some mutual fund manufacturers electing to abandon the corporate class structure, it has very little impact on the true benefit of the structure.

Structure still has tax-efficient distribution yields

Continue Reading…

Will fin-tech disrupt the asset-based model for dispensing financial advice?

Cute RobotMy latest Financial Post blog reports on the Radius Exchange Traded Forum 2016 conference that began on Tuesday and continues Wednesday at the Design Exchange in Toronto.

You can find the full blog by clicking on this highlighted headline: Robo Advisers and ETFs prove it’s time for a new financial advice fee structure. 

That model, described before here at the Hub, consists of taking advantage of the scaling possibilities of so-called “fin tech” (financial technology) like robo advisers and the underlying ETF structures, and moving from an asset-based model based on a percentage of client wealth, and moving to a Netflix-like monthly subscription model.

Needless to say, not everyone in the established financial industry is thrilled by that prospect. To quote one of the experts cited, “Index funds are like garlic to vampires for Wall Street.”