Longevity & Aging

No doubt about it: at some point we’re neither semi-retired, findependent or fully retired. We’re out there in a retirement community or retirement home, and maybe for a few years near the end of this incarnation, some time to reflect on it all in a nursing home. Our Longevity & Aging category features our own unique blog posts, as well as blog feeds from Mark Venning’s ChangeRangers.com and other experts.

Mini, Semi, or Early Retirement: Which Path fits your Life (and Wallet)?

Key Takeaways

  • Mini-retirement requires dedicated savings to cover expenses and missed retirement contributions
  • Semi-retirement can dramatically reduce the total capital needed for full retirement
  • Early retirement requires significantly more savings than traditional retirement to fund decades without employment income
  • Government benefits like CPP have flexible timing options that substantially impact your retirement income, while OAS doesn’t begin until age 65
  • Sustainable withdrawal rates vary based on retirement length: longer retirements require more conservative spending approaches

Canva Custom Creation: Lowrie Financial

By Steve Lowrie, CFA

Special to Financial Independence Hub

After decades of working with clients, I’ve noticed something interesting: the concept of retirement at 65 has become almost quaint. The reality is that very few people follow that traditional path anymore, and frankly, they shouldn’t feel obligated to. Your retirement should reflect your life, not some arbitrary date on a calendar.

Let me share what I’ve seen work for real people, and more importantly, help you figure out which approach might be right for you.

The three Alternative Retirement Paths people actually Take

Retirement isn’t a one-size-fits-all event anymore. Instead of that dramatic “last day at the office” moment at 65, most of my clients take one of three very different approaches.

Mini-Retirement: The Career Intermission

Think of this as an adult gap year but done right. You’re taking several months or even a couple of years away from work during your career, not at the end of it. I’ve had clients do this in their 30s, 40s, and 50s to travel, for a career change, or simply to take a break to recharge.

The upside is compelling: you get to enjoy life while you still have the energy and health to really do it. You can reset your career trajectory or return with fresh perspective. The mental and physical health benefits are real and measurable.

But let’s be honest about the downsides. Every month you’re not working is a month you’re not saving. You’re losing CPP credits that you can’t get back. And there’s no guarantee you’ll return to the same salary or position.

Here’s my advice if you’re seriously considering this: run the numbers first. Look at what taking a year off now means for your planned retirement date. Sometimes the math works beautifully. Other times, you realize that mini-retirement might cost you three extra years of work later. Know what you’re trading before you trade it.

Semi-Retirement: The Gentle Glide Path

This is my personal favorite approach for most people because I’ve seen it work so consistently well. Semi-retirement means you’re scaling back, not stopping. Maybe you go from five days a week to three. Maybe you move to consulting on your own terms. Or maybe you keep ownership in your business and hire professional managers to run it.

The benefits go beyond just the financial. Yes, that part-time income takes enormous pressure off your retirement savings. But you also maintain your professional identity and network. You stay mentally sharp and socially connected. The psychological adjustment is gradual rather than jarring.

The challenges are real though. Your time is still partially committed. Some clients find they can’t fully relax because they’re always thinking about that next project. And here’s a trap I see people fall into: they become dependent on that part-time income and never fully retire, even when they should.

Here’s a practical example. If you can earn $40,000 per year from part-time work for five years in your 60s, you would need $200,000 less on day one of retirement (before tax). Because you are not drawing from your investments in those early years, your portfolio has more time to compound, which often makes the overall impact even larger. That kind of bridge income can be the difference between retiring a few years sooner versus waiting. So, working fifteen hours a week doing consulting work you enjoy could mean the difference between retiring comfortably at 62 versus working full-time until 67.

Early Retirement: The Big Leap Exit

Early retirement means fully stepping back from your career: not just scaling down or taking a break but choosing to stop working altogether and move into the next phase of life with intention. Whatever age that might be, it’s ultimately a lifestyle choice about how you want to spend your time.

The appeal is obvious: no alarm clocks, no boss, no commute, complete control over every single day. If you retire at 55 instead of 65, that’s a decade of freedom while you’re still healthy and energetic enough to really use it.

But early retirement is not for everyone. You need significantly more savings because you’re funding potentially 40 or more years without employment income. The risk of outliving your money is real. You will receive smaller CPP payments if you start them before 65, and OAS doesn’t even begin until 65. While healthcare is covered in Canada, prescriptions, dental work, and long-term care come out of your pocket.

The truth is that early retirement requires substantial financial resources and a realistic understanding of what it costs to maintain your lifestyle. For many people, that can mean needing millions more invested to comfortably support several decades without employment income. Funding that many years of spending is no small task, and the risk of outliving your money is real. What matters most isn’t the retirement age or the size of your portfolio. It’s whether your resources can sustain the life you actually want, without unnecessary stress or sacrifice.

Understanding Financial Independence

Before we go further, we need to talk about what Financial Independence actually means in the context of these three paths.

Financial independence doesn’t necessarily mean you never work again. It means you have enough assets that you could live without employment income if you chose to. It’s about having options, not about making a specific choice.

For a mini-retirement, you’re not financially independent in the traditional sense. You’re taking a break, but you’re planning to return to work. Your financial goal is simpler: having enough savings to cover your expenses during the break without derailing your long-term retirement plans.

Semi-retirement sits in an interesting middle ground. You might be financially independent but are choosing to continue earning some income. Or you might not be fully independent yet, but close enough that part-time income bridges the gap. This flexibility is one of semi-retirement’s greatest strengths.

Early retirement requires full financial independence. Your investment portfolio needs to generate enough income and/or withstand enough withdrawals, to cover your living expenses for potentially 40+ years. This is a high bar, and it should be. The consequences of getting it wrong are serious.

Key Considerations before you Choose your Preferred Retirement Path

Every retirement decision has financial implications that ripple forward for decades. Let me walk you through what you need to think about.

CPP and OAS

Your Canada Pension Plan (CPP) benefit is directly tied to how much you’ve contributed and for how many years. Take a mini-retirement or retire early, and you’re leaving CPP contribution years on the table. You can defer taking CPP until age 70, increasing your monthly payment by 42% compared to taking it at 65. But if you’ve retired early and need the income, you might start at 60, accepting a 36% reduction.

Old Age Security (OAS) is simpler but has its own timing considerations. OAS doesn’t start until age 65, period. You can’t take it early like CPP, but you can defer it up to age 70 for a 36% increase. If you retire early at 55, you’re funding 10 years of life before OAS even begins. This is why early retirees need substantially more savings: you’re bridging a longer gap before government benefits kick in.

RRSPs and TFSAs

Every year you’re not working is a year you’re not maximizing these accounts. Miss a year of RRSP contributions in your 40s, and you’re losing not just that contribution but 20+ years of tax-deferred growth. If you retire early, you might need to start drawing from your RRSP before 71, and every dollar you withdraw is fully taxable as income.

Workplace Pensions

If you have a workplace pension plan, the rules around early retirement or phased retirement matter enormously. Some plans let you work part-time while starting to collect a partial pension. Others are all-or-nothing. You need to know your specific plan’s rules before making any retirement decisions.

Healthcare

Canada’s universal healthcare covers a lot, but prescription drugs, dental work, vision care, and eventually long-term care all come out of your pocket unless you have supplementary insurance. For a couple in their 60s, comprehensive health insurance can easily run $3,000 to $5,000 per year, and that’s before you actually use any services.

How your Retirement Path Choice shapes your Financial Strategy

Each retirement path requires a fundamentally different approach to saving, investing, and spending. Here’s what you need to know.

Mini-Retirement: Building the Bridge Fund

If you’re planning a mini-retirement, you’re essentially building a separate fund for that specific purpose. If you need $100,000 per year to maintain your lifestyle and want two years off, that’s $200,000. But if your original plan was to maintain $30,000 to $40,000 per year in savings, you will need to add another $60,000 to $80,000 to your savings/investments. So really, you’re looking at saving $260,000 to $280,000 for this mini-retirement.

Early Retirement: Maximizing Everything Now

Early retirement requires the most aggressive savings strategy. If you want to retire at 55 instead of 65, you need to save as if you’re retiring at 55 but living until 95. That’s funding 40 years of retirement instead of 30. It’s a double whammy:  you have fewer years to save and benefit from investment growth, and you start withdrawing earlier, which means your portfolio must last longer to sustain your lifestyle. On top of that, retiring early also means smaller CPP benefits, since you’re giving up contribution years and potentially starting the benefits earlier.  The result is that you may need 40–50% more capital than a traditional retirement would require. Continue Reading…

Almost six in ten Canadians worry they’ll run out of money in Retirement: especially women and young people

The majority of Canadians are afraid they’ll run out of money in Retirement, especially women and young people, according to a survey released Wednesday morning by the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB).

The 2025 CPPIB Retirement Survey  (for Financial Literacy Month) says 59% of all Canadians are afraid of running out of money during Retirement, with the percentage jumping to 63% for women, compared to just 55% of men. It also found a whopping two thirds (66%) of Canadians aged 28 to 44 share the same fear. As the CPPIB graphic  below illustrates, those who have a financial plan are slightly less worried.

 

As you’d expect the CPPIB to point out, the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) helps protect retired Canadians from this risk: as it says above, CPP “benefits are payable as long as you live and [are] indexed to inflation.”

Indeed, CPP and the other main government retirement income program, Old Age Security, are both valuable sources of inflation-indexed retirement income. CPP is available as early as age 60 and OAS at 65 but a staple of Canadian personal finance commentary is that the longer you wait to receive benefits, the higher the benefits will be. In the best of all worlds, you’d wait until 70 for both programs to start paying out, even if you have to keep working longer and/or start withdrawing money from your RRSP before it’s mandated at age 71/72. (While the CPPIB doesn’t mention it, retirees with no other savings may also benefit from the Guaranteed Income Supplement to the OAS: and the GIS  is tax-free.)

The second graphic reproduced below is less straight-forward: it appears to present various excuses for delaying the creation of a proper financial plan to help get to Retirement. Roughly half of younger Canadians cite their need to advance their careers and make more money, and to buy their first home as priorities.


While it’s true that if nothing else, the future arrival of CPP and OAS benefits should put minds partially at ease about covering off basic Retirement expenses, it seems to me pretty obvious that at least for those who lack a generous employer-sponsored pension plan (ideally an inflation-indexed Defined Benefit pension), that it will be necessary to maximize savings in RRSPs and TFSAs as soon as possible.

Because of the Time Value of Money and the magic of compounding investment returns (especially when tax-deferred in RRSPs and TFSAs), the sooner you start saving in these vehicles the better. There’s no excuse not to make RRSP contributions from the get-go, ideally as soon as you land your first real job, since it reduces your income tax. Yes, decades from now when RRSPs become RRIFs you’ll have to pay some tax on the ultimate withdrawals, but that’s more than made up by the tax-deferred investment growth. Continue Reading…

3 books I just read that Retirees DIYing their pensions need to read

Amazon.ca

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column looks at a must-read new book on Retirement as well as two related books on DIY stock-investing. You can read the full column by clicking on the highlighted headline: Who you gonna trust: Barry Ritholtz or Jim Cramer?

The must read and main focus of the MoneySense column is William Bengen’s A Richer Retirement: Supercharging the 4% Rule to Spend More and Enjoy More. If that sounds familiar it should: Bengen’s original book on the 4% Rule is considered the bible of retirement, with his famous “SAFEMAX” guideline of 4% a year being an annual amount of withdrawals that should be “safe” for retirees to continue for a full 30 years, even after inflation. The original book,  titled Conserving Client Portfolios During Retirement, was first published in 2006.

Never mind that even Bengen considers 4.7% be a more universal SAFEMAX. The original book was aimed at financial advisors and professionals while the new one ostensibly is aimed at retail investors and retirees. I say ostensibly because I was a little disappointed with it and found the plethora of complicated charts and tables a bit much for lay investors. Still, there’s a lot of common sense there: Inflation is big long-term threat to retirees as are bear markets. Withdrawing too much from portfolios can be disastrous if you are unfortunate enough to retire just as a bear market hits and/or inflation starts to bite.

On the other hand, sticking with the old 4% rule or even the smaller amounts of 3% or even 2% advocated by some cautious souls, could result in you withdrawing less than you really need to enjoy retirement, although the tax department and any heirs might commend your caution and frugality.

How to make money in any market

Amazon.ca

While it’s rare for me to buy new hardcover books because I receive so many “free” review copies of financial books, I actually did buy A Richer Retirement as soon as it was available on Amazon. Plus, unusually, I also bought two other brand new books on the related topic of investing and stock-picking.

One was Jim Cramer’s How to make money in any market, by the sometimes revered but often maligned host of  CNBC shows Mad Money and Squawk on the Street. It’s fashionable for some financial journalists who believe in efficient markets and indexing to diss Cramer but I am not in that crowd. In fact, Cramer recommends that newcomers to investing put the first US$10,000 into an S&P500 index fund or ETF.

However, for seasoned investors and even retirees, Cramer suggests putting half a portfolio in index funds and the other half in individual stocks. Where we part company is his recommendation that the bucket of stocks be restricted to just five names, which would mean 10% in each. For my money, that’s way too concentrated and risky, even though he often brags about how he is often accosted by Nvidia Millionaires who tell him they bought that stock as soon as he announced on air that he had renamed his dog Nvidia.

How NOT to invest

Amazon.ca

Finally, regulars to this site may already have read Michael Wiener’s review of Barry Ritholtz’s How NOT to invest, which appeared here in this blog a few weeks after appearing on his Michael James on Money blog.

To be sure, those who are fond of disparaging Jim Cramer might quip that should have been the title of his own book, seeing as there are actually ETFs out there that try to profit by shorting Cramer’s picks. As of this writing, my copy has arrived but I have not yet finished reading it, as it’s a bit longer than the other two.

But based on the book blurbs and Michael’s review, I have no doubt it will be worth reading, whether for younger investors or seasoned ones and/or retirees.

Finally, while I only just received my review copy, I note that David Chilton is publishing a new edition of his classic financial novel, The Wealthy Barber, which any young person just starting to invest should acquire.  I look forward to revisiting it.

 

 

 

The common mistakes made by Retirees

By Dale Roberts, CutTheCrap Investing, Retirement Club

Special to Financial Independence Hub

We all make mistakes. There is no such thing as the perfect portfolio. In the accumulation stage we usually have time to recover from mistakes and hopefully we’ll learn from those mistakes. Learning from mistakes will usually move us towards a more passive global core index-based portfolio. In retirement, we don’t always get a second chance. It is crucial to be aware and avoid any retirement pot holes. Kyle at the Canadian Financial Summit asked me to discuss and outline some of the key and common retirement mistakes. Of course, they are too many to mention in a 45-minute interview. Below, I will outline more of the common mistakes in retirement.

Here’s an AI outline of the Canadian Financial Summit.

The Canadian Financial Summit is an annual, free, virtual conference for Canadians to learn about personal finance and investing from Canadian experts. It covers topics like retirement planning, tax optimization, and investment strategies, with content tailored specifically for a Canadian audience to address Canadian-specific financial products and regulations. The goal is to provide practical advice to help attendees save money, invest better, and improve their financial literacy.

Canadian Financial Summit Speakers

The Summit begins on October 22 with headliners such as David Chilton (new Wealthy Barber book out in November), Rob Carrick, Jason Heath, Preet Banerjee and more. Here’s the list of speakers and topics.

My segment will air on October 24th. You can register through this Canadian Financial Summit link.

Once again, I am covering common retirement mistakes. Here’s the range of topics I had prepared for my discussion with Kyle. We touched on a few of these.

We have to start in the accumulation stage

Many retirement mistakes are born in the accumulation stage, and in the retirement risk zone.

Too much risk

Most investors take on too much risk. They are not investing within their risk tolerance level. That said, it has not been a problem since 2009: we have not been tested. But retirees and near retirees were certainly burned by the financial crisis and the dot com crash. For too many, their retirement was greatly impaired.

And of course, we can add in not taking on enough risk, for those who are risk averse. We need to take on the risk necessary to achieve our financial goals. All said, we always need to invest within our risk tolerance level.

The accumulation stage is dead simple

Go for growth while investing within your risk tolerance level. More money is “more better.”  More money will create more retirement income.

Paying ridiculously high fees

Fire your wealth-destroying high-fee mutual funds and the advisor they rode in on. Ditto for the retirement stage. You can do the research necessary, or look to an advice-only planner who specializes in retirement planning.

Don’t count the dividends

Don’t PADI – Potential Annual Dividend Income.

That’s like watching the oil gauge as you try to make the car go faster.

The dividends do not contribute to wealth creation. Dividends are a removal of value; that’s it. The share price drops by the value of the dividend. If you move the dividends back to your stock or ETF holding to buy more shares you are simply owning more shares at lower prices.

As Yogi Berra would ask: do you want your medium pizza cut into 8 slices or 6 slices?

You still have a medium pizza, no matter how you slice it.

Dividends are a tax drag in taxable accounts. You are paying tax on money you don’t need. You are paying tax on money that creates no value. It’s phantom wealth creation, but with real taxes.

Avoid covered calls and other specialty income

They underperform by design. That fact should be outlined in the prospectus.

Canadian home bias

This can be related to a fascination with Canadian dividends or Canadian Blue Chip stocks in general. For sure, building a portfolio of Canadian Blue Chips is known to greatly outperform the TSX Composite. But we need greater diversification to reduce risk.

A Canadian with severe home bias is putting all of their chips on a few sectors, one country and one currency. It’s not smart.

We should consider a global portfolio, at the very least a Canadian and U.S. portfolio.

Stock portfolios that are too concentrated

It’s common to see portfolios with just a few stocks. We need 15 to 20 stocks to mimic an index. You’re likely best to hold 20 or more.

We create severe company risk with a concentrated portfolio.

Clear your debt

Carrying debt into retirement is a common “mistake.”  A recent report suggested that 29% of Canadian retirees will carry a mortgage.

Consider the tax burden that it takes to create the income to pay the mortgage. Every extra dollar is at the top marginal rate. It’s a mortgage payment plus tax on top. A $3,000 monthly mortgage payment might cost you $4,000 or more when you consider taxes. It could also contribute to OAS claw back.

Consider the car payment as well. Try to enter retirement with a paid-off vehicle.

Not using spousal RRSP accounts

Use RRSP spousal accounts for tax advantaged income splitting in retirement.

This allows us to ‘split income’ before the age of 65. At age 65 we can then split income from your RRIF.

Ditto for setting up joint taxable accounts. Pay attention to attribution rules for taxable accounts.

The Retirement Risk Zone

Not preparing the portfolio (de-risking) for retirement before retirement is a common mistake. We enter the retirement risk zone several years before retirement. That was our topic last year for the Financial Summit.

Mistakes in Retirement

Not running a retirement cash flow calculator

This is a must for every retiree. A retirement calculator will help you discover the most optimal (and tax efficient) order of account harvesting. That is when, and how much, to remove from your RRSP / RRIF, Taxable accounts, and TFSAs, working in concert with pensions, other amounts plus, CPP and OAS. It can help us create tax efficiency and manage OAS claw backs.

Most Canadians will benefit from the RRSP / RRIF meltdown strategy. It involves delaying CPP and OAS for the massive increases in pension-like, inflation-adjusted income.

Check out Retirement Club for Canadians

From age 65 to 70, CPP increases by 42%, OAS increases by 36%.

To delay CPP and OAS we often use the RRSP / RRIF accounts (and at times a slice of TFSA or Taxable) to bridge the gap during those years. That is, we spend more heavily from the RRSP / RRIF while we wait for increased CPP and perhaps OAS.

It’s different for everyone, the retirement cash flow calculators will help you uncover the right approach for you. Only the software knows.

There are many retirement calculator options that are free use, or available at a very low fee. We are reviewing many of them at Retirement Club.

Examples: MayRetire, Milestones, Adviice, Perc-Pro from Frederick Vettese, optiml.ca, PWL Capital also offers a retirement calculator.

Not spending, not enjoying their money

We might embrace a U-shaped spending plan. We spend more in the early years: the go-go years. It might dip in the slow-go years, and then increase again in the later no-go years as health care cost, living in place, or retirement home plus assisted living costs increase greatly.

We might call that a ‘you-shaped’ spending plan. Continue Reading…

Is it Work or Is it Passion?

Billy and Akaisha Kaderli, RetireEarlyLifestyle.com

By Billy and Akaisha Kaderli

RetireEarlyLifestyle.com

Special to Financial Independence Hub

While taking a break from the sun and surf, relaxing in my hotel room in a tiny beach town on Mexico’s rugged Pacific Coast, my cell phone rang.

‘Howdy, Beautiful!’ my friend of four decades shouted from snow country, thousands of miles away. “Been watchin’ your website for years and I read all your stories. Love ‘em. But I thought you were retired!

How many times over the decades since we left the conventional work force have we heard that challenge? Our responses have ranged from surprised silence to justification of our volunteer work, to just laughing out loud.

We run a popular website, photograph our travels and share our lifestyle adventures with people like you. Some think that by doing this, we have somehow become unfit to call ourselves “retired.”

Today I would like to pose this question to you: “Once you leave the mainstream labor-for-paycheck world and become financially independent, aren’t you free to choose what you do with your time? When is something considered work, and when are you pursuing a passion?

Receiving Monetary Compensation

Most people with whom we have this conversation have one particular definition of retirement: You are not retired if you are receiving money for work performed.

Well I guess that rules out all of the Wal*Mart Greeters… but seriously, we’d like to counter this simplistic point of view.

If you are a landlord with several rentals that bring in monthly retirement income, can you ever be considered retired? Do you not have to oversee the properties, be responsible for making repairs, pay for maintenance and upkeep and search for qualified tenants? At the very least you must concern yourself with your manager.

What if you are like a friend of ours who discovered he had a latent talent for making sculptures, and now sells his bronze statues all over the eastern seaboard at Toney art shows? He receives funds from his commissioned work, but he couldn’t be happier following his passion. What does he care if someone doesn’t think he is retired?

Other friends whom we know well sold their accounting firm and moved to a working ranch – a dream come true for them. Instead of pushing paper and tax forms, they now raise horses, scoop poop, grow grapes to make award-winning wine, and cultivate boutique vegetables which they sell at local farmers markets. Is that work? No question about it. However, they are undoubtedly following a passion and their lives are enriched because of it.

A friend of ours is a domestic goddess with unmistakable artistic flare, and her husband is an adventurous handyman. They purchase old Victorian homes, renovate them room-by-room and then sell them at profit. Sure they receive income from their labors, but this income isn’t what sustains their portfolio. And why not utilize your talents and implement your dreams at this time of life that should be yours?

If you have left your Monday-through-Friday job but own a diverse portfolio which you must manage, or if you are trading stocks or receiving dividends, does this monetary compensation for your lifestyle disqualify you out of the official definition of being retired? What if you find the world of finance riveting? Are you supposed to stay away because someone somewhere will think you are disingenuous or not “really” retired?

If you are working you are not retired

Some people believe that if you do any sort of activity that would be considered in any fashion to be work, or if it takes any effort whatsoever, you have become unsuitable to wear the “I’m retired” label.

Yet we know all sorts of single retired women who raise dogs to sell, train rescue dogs for animal shelters or have a modest dog-walking “business” that they run in their neighborhoods. How many older retired men have we met over the years and in numerous communities who will fix your plumbing for a pittance or trade, solve an electrical problem or put down some flooring in your home? What if you want to write music, direct a play or act in one? All of this takes effort, focus and work.

What if you wanted to build a boat, restore old classic cars and sell them, or play in a jazz band for the clubs in your town? Are you back to the working grind – or engaging your passion?

Volunteering or mentoring

One may or may not receive compensation for donating time and expertise. Teaching English as a second language could get you out of the house and add dimension to your day, or it could defray the cost of airline tickets to a foreign country. If you allow this skill to enhance your travel budget have you transgressed against The Rules of Retirement?

I taught Thai massage in Mexico for free and created a note card business for the local women in my neighborhood. Billy coached a women’s basketball team to the finals, imported an electronic scoreboard for the city gym and built tennis courts in this same Mexican town. Was this work? Definitely. We both put in more hours than we want to know, but the return was making friends and having personal satisfaction for helping others. Continue Reading…