All posts by Jonathan Chevreau

Robo advisers here to stay: Dan Hallett

Posted By Jonathan Chevreau | July 14, 2015

Good piece by High View Financial Group’s Dan Hallett in the Globe & Mail the past 24 hours.

In Why robo-advisers are here to stay, Hallett notes that the user-friendly online investment advisory firms removes the sometimes intimidating barrier of dealing with human advisors face-to-face: “Leveraging the power of user-friendly technology removes that barrier for the tech-savvy while creating a scalable platform for these firms. This keeps costs low; a key benefit of Robo-Advisors.

(Note on spelling: the G&M spells it robo-adviser in the headline but robo-advisor in the story itself. The Hub prefers robo-adviser but some guest bloggers spell it the other way.)

In any case, this is a nice example of a market “naturally establishing a pricing floor for basic investment advice,” Hallett writes, “i.e. 35 basis points (0.35%) per year of the value of client portfolios plus tax and product fees.”

Hallett predicts some traditional advisors could get pushed out of the business: every Robo-Advisory firm he’s looked at is a licensed portfolio manager and hence a legal fiduciary.

Some Drawbacks
Continue Reading…

Weekly Wrap: Semi-retirement, Mini-Retirements, RVing & Variants

Posted By Jonathan Chevreau | July 11, 2015

The current issue of MoneySense features my Financial Independence column, with the current instalment being an update on the “semi-retired” first year of my personal Findependence: What semi-retirement is really like.

Do a search on semi-retirement and/or financial independence and you’ll find plenty more articles on this theme. For instance, in February, the Afford Anything blog ran a piece titled Mini-Retirements, Semi-Retirement, Early Retirement — What’s the Most Awesome Lifestyle? There are some interesting variants in the piece, such as “Perpetual Semi-Retirement.”

Back in April, The Toronto Star and other media ran stories like this one: Semi-retirement the new normal in Canada: Survey. The Hub also weighed in on the survey, noting that 15% plan never to fully retire, but many will embrace Semi-Retirement.

Way back, the Get Rich Slowly blog ran this reader story about Making the Move to Semi-Retirement. Note the reference to the classic book about Financial Independence, Your Money or Your Life, which is all about the tradeoffs between time/life energy and money. Recommended reading for anyone interested in Findependence!

The RV has replaced the rocking chair

5 Asian locations where retirement is more affordable than North America

Posted By Jonathan Chevreau | July 10, 2015

By Jonathan Chevreau

Financial Independence Hub

I’ve personally never travelled to southeast Asia, although my family has and my daughter currently is posted in Hong Kong for a one-year teaching gig. As a result, I was more than usually interested when a review copy came in the mail titled Planet Boomer: Retire now for less in Southeast Asia.

It’s written by a boomer Canadian couple, Jim Herrier and Ellen Ma, who left marketing and advertising positions in 2006 to move to Singapore and Shanghai, then researched a bunch of other locations to help them write the book.

The book is slated for release in mid-August.

Asia 50% more affordable than North America

The pair argue that the financial crisis of 2008-2009 battered the investment portfolios of many Canadian boomers, and that “the math of a comfortable retirement for many of the nearly 10 million Canadians between 44 and 64 is not working anymore.” On average, those boomers are $400,000 short of their ideal retirement savings goal. Most of the 15 destinations in five Southeast Asian countries are at least 50% more affordable than Canada or the United States. Continue Reading…

Credit cards as “survival” tool? This is nuts!

Posted By Jonathan Chevreau | July 8, 2015

By Jonathan Chevreau,

Financial Independence Hub

A disturbing survey was released today from Minneapolis-based Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America. Its press release about the Generations Apart survey led off with the statement that “Living with debt has become a way of life for both Generation X (Gen X) and baby boomers as the stigma of owing money is gradually disappearing.”

Here’s the bit that really got me: it found that 48% of both generations “agree that credit cards now function as a survival tool” and 43% agree that “lots of smart, hardworking people who are careful with spending also have a lot of credit-card debt.”

Allianz Life did note that this alarming “growing comfort with debt” may affect the retirement plans of Gen X: “Twice as many Gen Xers (27% versus 11% of boomers) say they are either unsure about when they plan to retire or don’t plan to retire at all.”

The 2,000 Americans surveyed include 1,000 boomers aged 49 to 67, and 1,000 Gen Xers aged 35 to 48. It found Gen Xers are carrying 38% more in mortgage debt (average of US$144,000 versus $90,000 for boomers) and 45% more in non-mortgage debt, comprised of student loan debt (average of US $12,000 versus $5,000 for boomers) and credit-card debt (average of US $8,000 versus $6,000 for boomers).

It suggested one reason Gen Xers have higher debt is there generally earlier use of credit cards – 76% of Gen Xers got their first credit card between the ages of 18 and 24 versus 68% of baby boomers.

Almost half of GenXers revolve their credit card balances

Ageing rates vary widely — and so may age of traditional retirement

Posted By Jonathan Chevreau | July 7, 2015

The BBC is reporting today on a study that shows Ageing rates vary widely. According to the report by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, even people born within a year of each other experienced a huge gulf in the speed at which their bodies age.

I was particularly struck by the finding that some 38-year olds were ageing so badly that their biological age was “on the cusp of retirement.” The study subjects were 954 people from New Zealand born between 1972 and 1973. 18 ageing-related traits were examined as the members of the group turned 26, 32 and 38. So in the case of the 38-year-old cohort, the “biological age” ranged from the late 20s to “nearly 60” — hence the “cusp of retirement” verbiage.

In some cases, the subjects appeared to virtually stop ageing while they found that others gained almost three years of biological age for every 12 months that passed. Those with older biological ages were found to perform worse in tests of brain function, and also tended to have a weaker grip.

Issues of fairness and egalitarianism

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Sign up for our Daily Digest E-Mail!